Judiciary should set example by denying anticipatory bail for culprits'

[email protected] (CD Network)
November 9, 2011

Mangalore, November 9: Mocking at the practice of the elite of getting themselves admitted to hospital when caught in legal net, Justice Michael Saldanha said that Judiciary should set example by denying or holding the plea for anticipatory bail by such culprits till they recuperate and get discharged from the hospitals.

Addressing a news conference in Mangalore on Tuesday, Justice Michael Saldanha speaking about recent church vandalism incident and the recent trends that have emerged as the repercussion to political instability in the State, said that, of the cases filed in the Karnataka State where illness is pleaded, only 1.4 per cent have some substance in it while the rest are all fake.

“In most of the cases it is only the powerful who either fall ill or are out of station when the police come searching for them. The poor are always caught and produced before the Court. The Court should come out clear and say that if you are absconding then you are disqualified to get anticipatory bail,” Justice Saldanha said adding that there is 'zero justification for hospitalisation' in most of the cases in the Karnataka State .

With regard to the VIP treatment given to the ministers and other notorious criminals in jails, Justice Saldanha said that details must be sought with regard to the money spent to provide special facilities at Parappana Agrahara Prison as well as other jails where these Ministers have been kept.

“It is better to construct a tunnel from Vidhana Saudha to Parappana Agrahara so that at least traffic in this route will be relaxed,” he said in a lighter tone.

Justice Saldanha said that while congestion in Court prevents poor from getting a bail for several days or months, these elite criminals when arrested by the police, manage to get bail in matter of hours.

“In special cases, applications are taken out of turn, even while 1,700 applicants wait in queue for their turn to come,” he said questioning as to under which provision of law these people are given special treatment.

With regard to recent vandalism in churches in the city, Justice Saldanha said that there is a need to have incisive investigation into the same as he feels that there are invisible hands playing behind these incidents.

“These are not sporadic incidents. Instead they are pre-planned. If these are sporadic incidents, then why have the vandalism taken place in prayer halls of one particular religion. If the person responsible for the incident is a lunatic venting out his frustration, has he vented it out at a religious centre of one religion and not anywhere else,” the Justice questioned.

pucl1

pucl2

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 12,2020

Bengaluru, Apr 12: As many as 17 new cases of coronavirus were confirmed on Sunday in Karnataka, taking the total number of infected to 232, the health department said.

This includes six deaths and 54 discharges.

According to the bulletin issued by the health department, six cases were reported from Vijayapura, four cases in Belagavi, three each in Bengaluru city and Kalaburagi and one in Mysuru.

Among the 17, four people are suffering from Severe Acute Respiratory Illness (SARI) -- two of whom are in Bengaluru and one each in Vijayapura and Kalaburagi, the department said.

Following the sudden spurt in cases in Vijayapura, the department has initiated contact tracing.

Ever since the outbreak of COVID-19, Bengaluru continued to top the list with 76 cases, followed by Mysuru with 48 cases, Belagavi with 14 cases, Kalaburagi with 13 cases and Dakshina Kannada with 12 cases.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2020

New Delhi, Feb 1: The budget is a little more demanding of the non-resident Indian. Firstly, to be categorized a non-resident, an Indian now has to stay abroad for 240 days, against 182 previously. In other words, an Indian national, to claim the non-resident status, can’t stay in India for 120 days or more in a year.

“We've made changes in Income Tax Act where if an Indian citizen stays out of the country for more than 182 days, he becomes non-resident,” said Revenue Secy Ajay Bhushan Pandey. “Now in order to become non-resident, he has to stay out of the country for 240 days.”

The second rule is more deadly: a non-resident Indian, who is not taxed in the foreign country, will become taxable in India.

“If any Indian citizen is not a resident of any country in the world, he'll be deemed to be a resident of India and his worldwide income will be taxed,” said Pandey.

"It's a very big disadvantage for Indians residing overseas only to save on tax,"  said Dinesh Kanabar of Dhruva Advisors. He expects that many Indians stay abroad in countries, where the income tax is low or nil such as Dubai. Now they will be taxed in India if they are in the income tax bracket.

For Indians, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman revised income tax rats and proposed new tax slabs.

The new income tax rates will, however, not allow exemptions under Section 80C. Home loan exemption, insurance exemptions, the standard deduction will also not stay under the regime.

"The new tax regime will be optional and the taxpayers will be given the choice to either remain in the old regime with exemptions and deductions or opt for the new reduced tax rate without those exemptions," Sitharaman said while unveiling Budget.

Comments

Kannadiga
 - 
Saturday, 1 Feb 2020

Good news NRIs vote for modi . 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 19,2020

Bengaluru, Apr 19: A recent government order prohibiting congregations, Ramadan prayers is discriminatory and needs to be withdrawn, JD(S) MLC B M Farookh has demanded.

In a letter to the chief secretary, Farookh pointed out that the order contained certain conditions such as restriction of the use of public address system and delivering Azan in low decibels, which had nothing to do with the prevention of Covid-19 disease.

“These days, Azan includes a call for the community to pray at home and does not offer namaz at mosque. The order also prohibits preparation and distribution of porridge, which has always been taken up in the interest of the poor. The High Court has noted that the relief distribution by NGOs or individuals should not be prevented and the state machinery has to coordinate the same by ensuring social distancing. The ban on distribution of porridge by mosques amounts to discrimination. The order needs to be withdrawn or revisited,” he wrote in his letter.

Further, observing that a religious fair was conducted in Kalaburagi recently, in violation of the government’s social distancing norms, Farookh sought the government to ensure that social distancing norms are enforced with regard to festivals of all communities without discrimination.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.