Air India Express faces Malayali wrath

October 21, 2012

malayali

 

Thiru'puram, October 21: Kerala Police, the airline and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation are all inquiring into the comedy of errors that dogged the Air India Express flight on Friday from Abu Dhabi to Kochi, resulting in a fracas between passengers and security personnel and a 'hijack' alert.

 

When the flight to Kochi was diverted to Thiruvananthapuram because of bad weather and the crew refused to fly back to Kochi on the grounds that their duty hours were over, it touched a raw nerve among the passengers, who were already delayed by over seven hours at Abu Dhabi.

 

The announcement that they would be taken to Kochi, 220km away from Thiruvananthapuram, by road only caused frayed tempers among passengers to boil over. They sought to prevent the pilot from disembarking, and she sounded a hijack alert, putting air traffic control authorities across the country in a tizzy.

 

There have been complaints from hapless travellers ever since Malayalis started making a beeline to the oil-rich Middle-East countries in the mid-1970s.

 

When it came to air fares and services on board, many low-budget travellers have complained that they are treated shoddily, and often fleeced by international airlines as well as by India's national carrier.

 

Air India Express, the budget airline of the national carrier, operates with 21 aircraft. Nearly 70 per cent of its flights operate from the three Kerala airports, and 80 per cent of its cabin crew is from Kerala when flights operate to the state or to the Mangalore airport in adjacent Karnataka.

 

Change can be effected in the situation, says a leading economist at the Centre for Development Studies (CDS) here. “These non-resident Keralites (NRKs) should use their combined might and totally ignore Air India. It's not proper for passengers to act in such an unbecoming manner, whatever the compulsions,” he said commenting on Friday's 'hijack' alert incident.

 

“No one forced the NRKs to travel Air India. There are so many airlines operating. If the NRKs can use their combined might, they will have Air India begging for custom,” said S. Irudayarajan of CDS, who has been studying the diaspora.

 

A recent study by the CDS here showed that there are currently more than 2.2 million Keralites in the Middle East countries. And the foreign currency that flows into the state from this region is estimated at Rs600 billion (Dh40.76 billion) annually.

 

There are now 11 international airlines operating flights between Kerala and the Middle East, and Jet Airways too flies to many Middle East destinations from the three Kerala airports.

 

An aviation expert, on condition of anonymity, told IANS that if things must change, Air India officials must introspect on the nature of services they offer.

 

“The biggest advantage that Air India has is that when it comes to air fares, it beats other airlines. It is always priced lowest, even at peak season. Moreover, Air India Express flights offer free meals,” the aviation expert said.

 

“Air India should have additional operating crew [pilots and co-pilots] in the state, at least from October to December, when bad weather is more likely to occur unexpectedly, as happened on Friday,” the aviation expert said.

 

Meanwhile, State Home Minister Thiruvanchoor Radhakrishnan said the six passengers who have been asked to report to police officials investigating into Friday's 'hijack' episode would not be harassed in any way.

 

“When we get a complaint, we need to look into it; we can hardly tear and throw a complaint away. Let the probe go on, we offer assurances that the passengers will not be harassed. Once the investigation is over, the government will take a decision on what needs to be done. There is no reason for the passengers to fear harassment,” Radhakrishnan told reporters Sunday.

 

Chief Minister Oommen Chandy recently announced that the state government would launch its own airline, Air Kerala, by April next year. It remains to be seen whether that airline will operate that much more efficiently, drawing lessons from the experiences of the national carrier.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 6,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 6: Activist Irom Chanu Sharmila took part in a protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR) at Sir Puttanna Chetty Town Hall here on Sunday.

Sharmila, who came in the protest along with her child, took part in a 'burqa and bindi' protest marking the birth anniversary of social reformer Savitribai Phule.

Protests have erupted across the country over the CAA which grants citizenship to Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Parsi, Buddhist, and Christian refugees from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh, who came to India on or before December 31, 2014.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 19,2020

Davanagere, Jan 19: Seven people, including four women, were arrested for allegedly selling a 13-month-old female baby here on Saturday.

Police said that the baby was sold to a couple who had no child. The couple hailed from Ranebennur town in Haveri District of Karnataka. They sold the baby, which was their fourth child.

The arrested were identified as Kavita (26) and her husband Manjunath (couple who sold the baby), Dakshayani (34) and her husband Ravi (49) of Ranebennur, Haveri District (the couple who purchased the baby, Chitramma (44) Nurse, Kamalamma (45) and Karibasappa, who acted as middlemen for the deal.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 18,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 18: Amidst the ongoing probe into the multi-billion IMA ponzi scam, another similar scam has come to light in the city wherein around 2500 depositors, most of them Muslims, are fearing that them may lose Rs 350 crore.

Shockingly, Shafiullah, Rafiullah, and Zabiullah, three brothers who run the Baraka Investment Consultant Private Limited, have accused the police of taking over 10 crore rupees bribe from them.

The depositors say that when they recently demanded their investments back from the accused the trio, they allegedly told them that they had paid the Central Crime Branch (CCB) and the RT Nagar police over 10 crores and they could collect that money from the police.

The aggrieved investors alleges that the RT Nagar police have charge-sheeted the three accused only on the complaints of 13 affected depositors who lost precisely Rs 97 lakh and the case is being probed under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 instead of Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Institutions Act, 2004 (KPID Act) or the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance, 2019 (BUDS) Ordinance.

Aggrieved victims alleged that when the Baraka Investment Consultants had a Registration Certificate of Establishments from Department of Labour issued on November 28, 2017. The CCB took up a suo-motu case against Tellnet Computers on August 16, 2018, after they received complaints from Baraka investors.

Apparently, the CCB knew that Baraka Investment Consultants and Tellnet Computers was one and the same and operating from the same office, but they did not mention the name of Baraka in the case initially for reasons best known to them, said the victims of the Ponzi scheme. A few victims who wished to remain anonymous told BM that a CCB police inspector and one of the accused, Zabiullah, were childhood friends, neighbours and both hailed from Chikkaballapur. This is one of the reasons, they allege, the inspector has protected the accused by downplaying the scam.

The case registered by the CCB states that there are only 500 to 600 depositors who deposited amounts between Rs 50,000 to Rs 1 lakh expecting returns ranging from Rs 5000 to Rs 7000 a month, but in reality there are more than 2500 investors who have deposited amounts ranging from Rs 50,000 to Rs 50 lakh, expecting returns between 12% to 24%, said the victims. Despite this, the CCB was sitting on the case and making no investigations, the victims alleged.

It was later on in May 9, 2019, an FIR was registered by the RT Nagar police when many victims approached the police commissioner and petitioned him. “Even in this case, the accused Zabiullah was not arrested. Zabiullah’s two brothers, Shafiullah and Rafiullah, and his father Abdul Rahman were arrested, but were later granted conditional bails,” one of the victims Mohammed Yahya (42), a software engineer said.

Yahya had invested Rs 10 lakh with Baraka. “Though this case has been charge-sheeted, the police have not made any recoveries or they have not confiscated any properties of the accused,” alleged victim Habibur Rehman (42) who had invested Rs 5 lakh in Baraka. “There is clear-cut evidence that the accused was dealing in foreign exchange using the investors’ money without their knowledge and was offshoring and parking crores and crores in countries like Russia, Dubai, Malaysia, and Singapore. Though the police knew about this, they did nothing to stop it or bring it back,” said Azgar Pasha (44), a businessman who had invested Rs 41 lakh.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.