Zardari visit thaws India-Pak freeze

April 10, 2012

zardari_copy_copy_copy

New Delhi, April 10: Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari’s visit to India on Sunday seems to have begun paying peace dividends with the Supreme Court granting bail to a 80-year-old Pakistan scientist convicted of murder, and both sides beginning work on a hassle-free visa regime for businessmen of both countries.

On Sunday, during the visit of Zardari for lunch with prime minister Manmohan Singh and a pilgrimage to Ajmer, Pakistan had requested India to consider the case of Mohammed Khalil Chishti, the Pakistani microbiologist who was sentenced to life term in 1992 for a murder he committed in India.

Taking a sympathetic view, A Bench of Justice P Sathasivam and Justice J Chelameswar provided relief to the microbiologist but told him to stay back in Ajmer in Rajasthan till further directions. The court told Chisti’s counsel to file separate applications for allowing the scientist to live in Delhi and to go back to Karachi.

In a departure from the usual, the Bench hoped that the bonhomie created between the two countries during Sunday’s visit of Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari to Ajmer would continue in future as well. “Let us hope what has happened yesterday (Sunday) will continue,” the Bench said.

‘Good things happening’

“What we have read from today’s (Monday) newspapers is that good things are happening,” the Bench added. The court considered on humanitarian ground the plea made by senior advocate U U Lalit, appearing for Chishti, who has been suffering from several ailments.

In yet another fallout of the visit, Pakistan High Commissioner Sahid Malik said on Monday that his country and India were working towards a liberalised visa regime for businessmen that may see the two countries issuing one-year, multi-entry and non-reporting visas to businessmen of either country.

The proposal was discussed at Sunday’s meeting between Zardari and Manmohan Singh, and both leaders desired to improve relations between the neighbouring nations, Malik told an interactive session organised by industry chamber Assocham.

“Taking note of his present age and also considering the fact that he was in Ajmer for the last 20 years and… without expressing anything on the merits of the case, we are satisfied that the appellant has made out a case for enlarging him on bail.

Accordingly, the appellant is ordered to be released on bail in Sessions Case No. 157 of 2001 to the satisfaction of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track) No.1, Ajmer,” the Bench said.

The apex court, however, left the issue of conditions for Chishti’s release to the trial court in Ajmer.

During the hearing, counsel appearing for the Rajasthan government opposed the arguments for Chishti’s bail, contending that the appellant being a Pakistani national, it was not desirable to release him on bail.

Chishti had come to Ajmer from Karachi to see his ailing mother in 1992.

During his stay, he got involved in a fight with neighbours over property, leading to the shooting down of a man named Idris Chishti.

The Ajmer-born scientist had remained in confinement after his arrest in the case. The trial court had, on January 31, 2011, held him guilty and awarded life term.

During Zardari’s visit, Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik raised the case of scientist with his Indian counterpart P Chidambaram, who was understood to have told him that the matter was in court.

Immediately after the bail order, Chishti’s nephew Salman hailed the SC’s decision and hoped that he would soon be sent back to Karachi to join his family and grandchildren.

Step forward

* Jailed Pakistani scientist Mohammed Khalil Chishti granted bail

* Conditions for his release left to the trial court in Ajmer

* He will fly to Karachi to join family

* Pakistan, India working on liberalised visa regime for businessmen

*One-year, multi-entry and non-reporting visas might be issued

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 26,2020

Hyderabad, Feb 26: Hyderabad Police on Tuesday registered a case against well-known poet Imran Pratapgarhi for his statement asking why there was "no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad".

According to Charminar Police, the complaint was registered by Sub-Inspector S Guruswamy, who was on duty at the QQ Stadium on February 24 where an Ehtaji Mishaira (Poetry Program) against the Citizenship Amendment Act, National Register Commission and National Population Register was held.

Permission for the said event was granted by Hyderabad Additional Commissioner of Police to the program organisers with certain guidelines including that poetry program should be held on February 24 from 6 pm to 9 pm, and no speaker should give provocative speeches in the program.

However, police said that the program was started by the organisers at 6 pm and continued till 9:48 pm even after police officers asked them to end the event by 9 pm. The program was attended by around 3,000 members at QQ stadium.

According to police, while addressing the meeting Pratapgarhi said: "Mujhe hairath hai us Hyderabad mein koi Shaheen Bagh kyu nahi hai (I am surprised why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad)", which is "provocative" and may cause fear to any section of the public.

In this regard, a case has been registered against organisers for disobeying public servants' orders and the poet has been booked for delivering provocative statements under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Further investigation is underway.

Meanwhile, Congress leader Mohammed Ali Shabbir took to Twitter to condemn the police action.

"Hyderabad Police booked a case against poet Imran Pratapgarhi for expressing surprise on why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad. For police, this sentence is provocative. Is Shaheen Bagh not a part of India?," Shabbir tweeted.

"Shame on TRS Government and Hyderabad Police for targeting a poet for no-fault," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 4,2020

New Delhi, Feb 4: Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, on Tuesday attacked the BJP over Anantkumar Hegde's controversial remark on Mahatma Gandhi and termed the party as "Ravan ke aulad" (children of Ravana). "Aaj ye Mahatma Gandhi ko gaali dete hain. Ye Ravan ke aulad hain. Ram ke pujari ka ye apmaan kar rahe hain (Today, they abuse Mahatma Gandhi. They are children of Ravan. They are insulting Lord Ram's devotee)," Chowdhury said.

Later, BJP lawmakers object to Chowdhury's statement. Hegde, who is a Lok Sabha MP from Uttara Kannada, had on Saturday said that the freedom struggle led by Mahatma Gandhi was a "drama".

"None of these so-called leaders were beaten up by the cops even once. Their independence movement was one big drama. It was staged by these leaders with the approval of the British. It was not a genuine fight. It was an adjustment freedom struggle," Hegde had said while addressing a public event in Bengaluru. While several Congress leaders, including Karti Chidambaram and BK Hariprasad, have condemned Hegde's remark, BJP leaders too have distanced themselves from it.

Top leadership in BJP is unhappy with Anantkumar Hegde over his controversial remark on Mahatma Gandhi, party sources had said on Monday, adding that he has been asked to issue an unconditional apology.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 11,2020

New Delhi, Mar 11: A doctor in Kerala on Tuesday alleged that she was sacked by the management of the private clinic she was working with for informing authorities about a non-resident Indian (NRI) patient who reportedly declined to undergo the mandatory check for coronavirus.

Dr Shinu Syamalan said the patient had come to the clinic recently with suspected symptoms of the virus.

"When he was asked whether he had visited any foreign countries, he said he was coming from Qatar. But he had not reported to the Health department about his foreign trip," she said.

When he was directed to inform about his foreign travel to the state Health Department, which has been monitoring people coming from abroad for the virus, he refused and said he was going back to Qatar, she told reporters.

Concerned over the health of the person who had high fever, Ms Syamalan informed health and police authorities.

"Officials who let the patient go abroad do not have any problem, but I have become jobless," she posted on social media.

She alleged she was sacked by the management of the clinic for reporting the matter to police and informing the public about the incident through social media and through television.

"The argument of the management is that no one would turn up for treatment in the clinic if they come to know that it was visited by patients with suspected symptoms of Coronavirus," she said.

There was no immediate reaction from the management of the private health clinic.

Official sources said the District Medical Officer (DMO) at Thrissur has complained to the collector against Shinu Syamalan accusing her of defaming health officials.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.