Students won’t have to bear RTE cost, says Sibal

April 16, 2012

student_RtI

New Delhi, April 16: The government has sought to assure parents that the Supreme Court’s verdict making free education to 25 per cent children from weaker sections mandatory in private schools will not prompt the school managements to increase other students’ fee in order to shift the burden.

“I do not think that will happen. I think there would be ways and means to raise resources. We will be working with schools in order to do that. We will try our level best. Nobody will be penalised for this,” Human Resource Development (HRD) Minister Kapil Sibal told a news channel on Sunday, when asked if the burden of providing free education to the 25 per cent would be passed on to other students.

Asked who will pay the tab for the 25 per cent reservation, Sibal said schools which had not taken any benefit from the government would be compensated by the government under the Right to Education (RTE) Act.

"We have made the calculation," Sibal said. The government would incllude the provision of school uniforms and textbooks in the twelfth Five Year Plan to those students admitted in 25 per cent quota under the Act.

As per the Act, schools providing free and compulsory elementary education would be reimbursed expenditure so incurred on the students from weaker and disadvantaged sections to the extent of per-child-expenditure incurred by the state concerned, or the actual amount charged from the child, whichever is less.

“The amount of disbursement to schools against the expenditure incurred on students from weaker sections by them would differ as it will be decided on the basis of the RTE rule formulated by each of the state the implementation of the Act,” a senior official of the HRD Ministry told Deccan Herald.

According to a rough estimate, the expenditure to be incurred per child would vary from Rs 6,000 to Rs 17,000. In Delhi, the government incurs an expenditure of Rs 14,300 per annum per child, sources in the ministry said.

Sibal suggested that the schools could raise resources from their funds if they had their resources in surplus. They could also tap the funds provided by corporates under their corporate social responsibility obligations.

"You have many corporates who are committed for corporate social responsibilities. Schools can actually tap their resources so that there is no burden on parents," he said.

Free education

He underlined that Rs 2.31 lakh crore had been earmarked for implementing provisions of the Right To Education Act Act in the eleventh Plan period. Providing free education to all the children was not possible for the government and therefore, private schools had been made responsible along with those run by government to achieve the mission.

“The gap between the rich and the poor is enormous. We must move forward and we must have an inclusive society in which all must participate. After years of deliberations, we thought we must try and integrate disadvantaged communities into the school. Social integration is the motive behind the move," he said.

The RTE Act makes free and compulsory education to children between 6 to 14 years of Class I to VIII. When asked what would happen to those students to be admitted under 25 per cent quota after class VIII, Sibal said there could be a rethinking on the issue after eight years.

"After eight years, the whole situation will change. There will be a government at that time. Maybe there will be a rethinking on it."

To a question why boarding schools were kept out of the purview of the Act, he said they had a different ecosystem where classes, generally, start from Class VI onwards.

"As and when we feel they should come under purview of the act, we will think of it," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 13,2020

Jun 13: The Congress on Saturday accused the BJP-led government of burdening the common man with high taxes on petrol and diesel and earning Rs 2.5 lakh crore since March 5.

Congress leader Kapil Sibal said while international crude oil prices have fallen and are at the lowest level in 15 years, yet petrol and diesel prices are skyrocketing and common people continue to suffer under the Modi dispensation.

He said instead of passing the benefit of lower crude prices to consumers, petrol and diesel prices were hiked for the seventh straight day on June 13.

"The government has earned as much as Rs 44,000 crore in the last six days due to hike in petrol, diesel prices. Since March 5, the government has earned as much as Rs 2.5 lakh crore by way of increasing petrol, diesel prices.

"If the government had even the slightest feelings for the common man, instead of benefitting the companies and the government, the prime minister would have helped the common man with reduced fuel prices," Sibal said at an online press conference.

According to a report by Care Ratings, he said the hike effectively meant that the Central government is collecting around 270 per cent taxes on the base price of petrol and 256 per cent in case of diesel.

The former union minister said petrol was selling at Rs 71.41 in Delhi on May 1, 2014, when international crude oil prices were USD 106.85, while on June 12, 2020, the price of petrol was Rs 75.16 when the crude oil was at USD 38.

He said central excise and VAT cumulatively account for 69 per cent of tax on fuel in India which is higher than anywhere else in the world. He said the tax of fuel in the US was 19 per cent, Japan 47 per cent, the UK 62 per cent, France 63 per cent and Germany 65 per cent.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 3,2020

New Delhi, Feb 3: The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted bail to former BJP leader Swami Chinmayanand in the alleged rape case of a law student. He was arrested in September last year after the 23-year-old woman accused him of sexual harassment and blackmail.

The woman was a student of the Chinmayanand-controlled SS Law College in Shahjahanpur in Uttar Pradesh.

Chinmayanand is facing charges under Sections 376C (sexual intercourse by a person or persons taking advantage of their official position), 354 D (stalking), 342 (wrongful confinement) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case is being investigated by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed on the directions of the Supreme Court.

The case came to light after the woman posted a video on August 23 last year on social media alleging that “a senior leader of the saint community” was harassing and threatening to kill her. The law student went missing a day later, after which her father lodged a complaint, accusing Chinmayanand of harassing his daughter.

Chinmayanand was expelled from the BJP after his arrest.

The SIT had, on November 6, submitted chargesheet in the case.

In a parallel case, the woman was charged with trying to extort money from Chinmayanad. The Allahabad High Court granted her bail in that case in December last year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 23,2020

Expressing concern over the ban imposed on TikTok by the government of India, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly called the development in the south Asian country “worrisome”.

TikTok was amongst the 59 Chinese apps that were banned in India but why it hogs the maximum limelight because TikTok had the second-largest user base in India with over 200 million users.

As per The Verge writer Casey Newton, Zuckerberg was worried about TikTok’s India ban. Although it soon cashed into the opportunity and released a TikTok clone “Reels”, the government’s reason behind banning the app in India wasn’t received well by Mark Zuckerberg. 

He had said that if India can ban a platform with over 200 million users in India without citing concrete reasons, it can also ban Facebook if something goes amiss on the security and privacy front.

Why Mark finds it particularly worrisome because Facebook is already involved in a lot tussle with the governments across the world involving national security concerns. 

“Facebook already faces fights around the world from governments on both the left and the right related to issues that fit under the broad umbrella of national security: election interference, influence campaigns, hate speech, and even just plain-old democratic speech. Zuckerberg knows that the leap from banning TikTok on national security grounds to banning Facebook on national security grounds is more of a short hop,” the report by Casey read.

Facebook till now has not faced any kind of issue in India but considering the debacle with the other governments, it is not entirely wrong to worry about its future in India if any national security issue arises. Back in 2016, Facebook’s Free Basics service, which means a free but restricted internet service, was banned in India by the telecom regulators. 

The TRAI had said that the Free Basic services were banned in India because it violated the principles of net neutrality. With Free Basics services, Facebook had planned to bring more unconnected users online. But since 2016, there has been no major tussle between the Indian government and Zuckerberg due to national security issues.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.