Batla House trial throws up questions

May 3, 2012

sept_13.2008_Blast

New Delhi, May 3: The Delhi serial blasts (September 13, 2008) trial has taken a curious turn with discrepancies showing up in the phone records of Atif Ameen, the terror accused gunned down in the shootout at Batla House.

Among other things, records produced in the court of Additional Sessions Judge Narinder Kumar showed the following: call logs of conversations between Ameen and another “terrorist” did not match; secondly, Ameen's application to Vodafone (EX.PW102/N) for a post-paid connection did not carry mandatory documents such as a valid address proof and a no objection certificate (NOC) from the original allottee. Without the address proof, no service provider can allot a mobile phone number while the NOC is a must for all applications seeking transfer of a number from one user to another.

According to the prosecution, Ameen switched from a pre-paid to a post-paid connection and he also wanted the transfer of a number already in use.

This led to some dramatic moments in the court room with defence lawyer M.S. Khan arguing that the Special Cell of the Delhi police had fabricated a post-paid connection in the name of Ameen with the help of a senior official of Vodafone.

Prosecution's case

According to the charge sheet filed in the 2008 Delhi serial blasts case, the team of Special Cell that gunned down Ameen tracked him to his address at L-18 at Batla House in Jamia Nagar through his Vodafone mobile number 9811004309 which was under watch. The prosecution's case is that this number belonged to Ameen and had been used for plotting and organising the Delhi and other connected blasts.

Said the chargesheet: “On 19.09.2008, on the basis of specific input, the team of Special Cell/NDR went to flat No. 108 of L-18 Batla House, Delhi, to trace the user of mobile number 9811004309. There a shootout occurred between inmates and team of Special Cell/NDR.”

Testifying in the court, the Vodafone official (a copy of his statement is in the possession of The Hindu ) said he had earlier worked for the Army Intelligence in Jammu and Kashmir and continued to liaise with the Special Cell of Delhi Police and other security agencies. However, he denied that the call or phone detail of the alleged terrorists was manipulated.

The Vodafone official admitted that there was no address proof, let alone the address proof of L-18 Batla House, attached to Ameen's application form. This led defence lawyer Khan to ask: “How can you track Atif to L-18 at Batla House when there was no address proof attached with the alleged phone application form, let alone the address proof of L-18, Batla House?”

The company official also told the court that the mobile number 9811004309 was not originally allotted to Ameen. Till August 11, 2008, which is just 39 days before the encounter of September 19, 2008, the number was a pre-paid connection in the name of Mirza Shadab. After this date, the number was transferred as a post-paid number to Ameen, a transfer, which, Mr. Khan argued in the court, was done “violating every telecom rule, without obtaining any of the mandatory documents and without the consent of the prior user Mr. Shahdab.” The defence lawyer went on to allege that the transfer was done “after the encounter to prove that the encounter was genuine.”

The Vodafone official told the court that a prepaid number used by one user could not be transferred to another user as a post-paid connection without an NOC from the former. In the event there was no NOC, “the previous allottee and the subsequent allottee had to come together for the allotment of connection.” Neither did Shadab provide an NOC nor did he accompany Ameen for the transfer: “There is nothing on record to suggest that in this case the previous allottee and Atif Ameen had come together at the time of allotment of connection to the latter.”

Mr. Khan argued that though the Vodafone official accepted in court that the process of taking a post-paid connection is “very stringent,” he had failed to explain how the violation of several rules could occur in this case.

The prosecution's case is that on September 6, 2008, Ameen (9811004309) talked to another “terrorist” on9899284784in order to organise the blasts. However, records produced by the service provider showed a mismatch between the entry timings of the conversations (between the two) as registered on the server, which, the defence argued, would be impossible in a normal situation unless records had been tampered with. However, according to legal experts, the case is still at a very early stage and no conclusions can be drawn on the basis of discrepancies brought to the court's attention. Much will depend on what further evidence the prosecution can bring, and whether it holds up to scrutiny.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 2,2020

New Delhi, Jun 2: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday said India will definitely get its economic growth back as the government continues to pursue various reforms.

Speaking at industry association CII's annual session, he said the government has taken tough steps to fight the coronavirus pandemic and has also taken care of the economy.

"On the one hand we have to safe lives of our people and on the other hand we have to stabilise the economy and speed up the economy," he said.

He said he gets the confidence from farmers, small businesses and entrepreneurs for getting the economic growth back.

"Corona may have slowed our speed (of growth) but India has now moved ahead from lockdown with the phase one of unlock. Unlock Phase-1 has reopened a large part of the economy," he said.

He said intent, inclusion, investment, infrastructure and innovation are crucial for India to revert back to a high-growth trajectory.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 23,2020

New Delhi, May 23: India witnessed the biggest ever spike of 6,654 positive cases in the last 24 hours, taking the total number of COVID-19 cases to 1,25,101, according to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

As many as 137 deaths have been reported in the last 24 hours, taking the death toll to 3,720.
Out of the total number of cases, 69,597 are active and 51,784 have been cured/discharged or have migrated.

Maharashtra continues to remain the worst-affected state with 44,582 COVID-19 cases. It is followed by Tamil Nadu (14,753), Gujarat (13,268), and Delhi (12,319).

The nationwide lockdown imposed as a precautionary measure to contain the spread of COVID-19 has been extended till May 31.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 18,2020

New Delhi, Jun 18: The border clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers in Ladakh broke the brittle quiet – and also the sense of security for anxious Chinese nationals in India who fear a backlash with anti-Chinese sentiment spiralling in the country.

With the high altitude violent face-off in eastern Ladakh’s Galwan Valley spurring hashtags such as “Boycott China” and “Teach Lesson to China” and leading to street protests, the undercurrents of tension were evident.

Wary of being identified, some said they had been reassured by their friends but were still apprehensive for themselves and their families.

"They (Chinese families) don''t want to speak to the media. They are not going out and are worried about their security and well being. Their families are also worried back home," Mohammed Saqib, secretary general of the India China Economic & Cultural Council, told PTI.

He added that his Chinese friends in India been calling him since they heard news about Monday night’s clashes in which 20 Indian soldiers were killed -- the worst military confrontation in five decades -- and expressed concern over growing anti-China sentiments.

A Chinese national from Beijing working in Gurgaon for a Chinese mobile firm initially refused to talk, saying he did not want to speak to the media and later shared his thoughts only on condition of anonymity.

"There is talk of border standoff and tensions, but we know Indians are very warm people and that is why I have told my family that all is fine here and they should not worry," he said.

Another Chinese national working in Gurgaon said he and his family are feeling the stress amid the spiralling conflict between India and China, but many friends have been reassuring him.

"They (Chinese in India) are under a lot of stress naturally. Such a conflict puts a lot of stress as they could bear the brunt and the same applies to Indians in China," B R Deepak, professor at the Centre for Chinese and South East Asian Studies of the Jawaharlal Nehru University said.

He said it was unfortunate that the border standoff derailed the commemorative programmes aimed at strengthening ties at a time the two countries were gearing to celebrate 70 years of establishment of diplomatic ties.

Experts also feel the border clash is likely to have a significant negative impact on the economic and people to people ties.

There are scores of Chinese in India working in various Chinese firms and also those who are studying in universities like JNU.

About 3,000 Chinese people, doing business or studying in big cities in India, were stranded in India at the start of the COVID-19 crisis, and about half of them returned to China before the lockdown began on March 25.

The Chinese Embassy in New Delhi announced on May 25 that they will arrange for flights to take back students, tourists and businesspersons to five Chinese cities, including Shanghai and Guangzhou.

"It will impact the psychology of the Chinese here. There are 2,000 Chinese firms in various sectors in India which are going to be impacted," Deepak said.

Future investments from the Chinese side could also be impacted, he said.

Moreover, as far as people-to-people contacts are concerned, the number of Chinese students choosing India as a preferred destination is likely to go down, Deepak said.

Alka Acharya, another China expert, said there are two kinds of impacts of such an incident -- short term and medium term.

Usually after the initial nationalistic reaction in the short term things tend to normalise in the medium term, but with such a border clash happening for the first time in decades clearly the resonance would be much more in both India and China, said Acharya, professor at the Centre for East Asian Studies, School of International Studies, in JNU.

“Due to the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the economy, whether India can take a hardline in terms of economics towards China, is a tricky question,” she said.

In the immediate context, there may be a dip in economic ties with calls for boycott of Chinese goods and services, Acharya said.

The manner in which this crisis is resolved will affect how ties will be affected in the medium term, she said.

The headlines have added to the anxiety.

A group of ex-armymen gathered near the Chinese embassy to protest the killing of 20 Indian Army personnel in Ladakh’s Galwan Valley. And another group of around 10 protesters belonging to the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch protested near the Teen Murti roundabout in Central Delhi.

The anti-China sentiment prevalent among the common public is also finding a reflection in government policy with sources saying the Department of Telecom (DoT) is set to ask state-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) not to use Chinese telecom gear in its 4G upgradation.

Trade bodies like CAIT are also calling for a boycott of Chinese products.

And Chinese handset maker Oppo cancelled the livestream launch of its flagship 5G smartphone in the country amid protests.

Monday night’s clashes between the Chinese and Indian troops in Galwan Valley significantly escalated the already volatile border standoff between the two countries.

The casualties on the Chinese side are not yet known. However, government sources, citing an American intelligence report, claimed the total number of soldiers killed and seriously wounded could be 35.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.