GoM takes on Modi over claim of rapid development in Gujarat

June 14, 2012

pc

Ahmedabad, June 14: The three-member Central Group of Ministers' on Wednesday took Chief Minister Narendra Modi head-on on his claim of rapid development in Gujarat and its being “ahead of all other States in the country.”

Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, who was leading the GoM, not only refuted the State government's charges of discrimination and injustices against the Centre, he also saw nothing new in Mr. Modi's “story of development.” Union Information, Broadcasting and Women's Welfare Minister, Ambika Soni claimed that malnourishment among women and children in Gujarat was higher than the national average, while Law, Justice and Minority Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid dismissed as “mere myth” Mr. Modi's claims that the minorities in Gujarat were better off than their counterparts in other parts of the country.

Ms. Soni claimed that while the percentage of malnourished women in the country was 51 per cent, in Gujarat it was 55 per cent. The malnutrition among the children, which was 70 per cent in Gujarat in 2000, had risen to 80 per cent now which was much higher than the national average of 56 per cent, she claimed.

“This government claims to be vibrant but vibrancy depends on how women and children stand up with self-respect. How can 55 per cent of malnourished women and 80 per cent malnourished children can stand up with dignity?” she asked.

Ms. Soni's claims, however, were immediately contradicted by the Gujarat Health Minister Jaynarayan Vyas, who called it “manipulation of figures.” Quoting from the Central government department statistics, Mr. Vyas claimed that in both the cases of women and children, Gujarat was lower than the national average on the malnourishment front. While 55 per cent of the women in the State were malnourished, the national average was 56 per cent and among the children, the figure was 46 per cent for Gujarat as against 51 per cent for the national average, he claimed.

Minorities better off?

“There is nothing to indicate that the minorities in Gujarat were better off than their counterparts in other parts of the country,” Mr. Khurshid said. He said Gujarat was the only State where the pre-matriculation scholarships for the minority students were not being implemented because the State government did not accept the scheme. “We have received complaints, but we cannot force the State to accept it as it required 25 per cent contributions from the State government. Gujarat is not ready as it claimed to have better scholarship schemes existing in the State than accept the Central scheme,” he said.

Mr. Chidambaram agreed that Gujarat was among the developed states, but that was nothing unique nor had it achieved the feat all by itself. He said it was good that the States compete with each other as it would lead to national development. “There is no doubt Gujarat's own resources have increased, but tremendous amount of Central assistance was also being pumped into the State to contribute to its development,” he said.

‘No discrimination’

The Home Minister refuted the allegations that Gujarat was being discriminated against and that the Centre was meting out any injustice to the State on political grounds. “Do not take such allegations seriously,” he said.

About the alleged harassment of some Indian Police Service cadre officers in the State, Mr. Chidambaram said the Centre would not like to interfere unless there was a specific complaint. He said he had received some complaints in this respect and had taken up the matter with the State but said generally he would expect all the State governments to treat their IPS officers “fairly and with dignity.”

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 12,2020

An Indian national was killed and four others injured in alleged firing by Nepal police personnel along the India-Nepal border in Bihar's Sitamarhi district today.

Sources said the firing took place after a clash between the Indians and personnel of Nepal police at the Lalbandi-Janki Nagar border in Pipra Parsain panchayat under Sonebarsha police station of the district.

Jitendra Kumar, the additional director general of police (headquarters), confirmed the death and injuries. The place of firing falls under Nepal jurisdiction.

Locals said Vikesh Kumar Rai, 25, died on the spot and Umesh Ram and Uday Thakur received bullet injuries when they were working in an agricultural field. Another person, Lagan Rai, is said to have been detained by the Nepali police.

Injured persons were rushed to Sitamarhi Sadar Hospital for better treatment.

Vikesh Kumar Rai’s father, Nageshwar Rai, said that his agriculture land falls under Narayanpur in Nepal where his son was working.

On May 17, Nepal police had fired blank rounds to disperse dozens of Indians trying to cross the border. It was not clear if they were also farmers.

The district magistrate and the superintendent of police of Sitamarhi have rushed to the spot.

Nepal shares a 1,850-kilometre (1,150-mile) open border with India and people travel across it for work and to visit family. It had closed its international borders on March 22 amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 18,2020

New Delhi, Jan 18: The Supreme Court Friday refused to entertain a PIL seeking conferment of 'Bharat Ratna' on Mahatma Gandhi saying that people hold the father of the nation in “high esteem”, beyond any formal recognition.

A bench, comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant, however asked petitioner Anil Dutta Sharma to give representation to the central government in this regard.

“Mahatma Gandhi is the father of nation and people hold him in high esteem, beyond any formal recognition,” the bench said.

The issue of directing the government to award Bharat Ratna to the father of the nation was not a “justiciable issue”, it said.

The bench however said that it agreed with the sentiments of the petitioner for granting official decoration to Mahatma Gandhi.

Disposing of the petition, the top court said, “We will allow you to give a representation to the Centre in this regard.”

Sharma, in his PIL, had sought a direction to the government to give “official decoration” to Mahatma Gandhi to honour him for the contribution to the nation.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 4,2020

New Delhi, Mar 4: The government on Wednesday permitted NRIs to own up to 100 per cent stake in disinvestment-bound Air India.

The decision comes at a time when the government is looking to sell 100 per cent stake sale in the national carrier.

Union minister Prakash Javadekar said the Cabinet has approved allowing Non-Residents Indians (NRIs) to hold up to 100 per cent stake in Air India.

Allowing 100 per cent investment by Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) in the carrier would also not be in violation of SOEC norms. NRI investments would be treated as domestic investments.

Under the Substantial Ownership and Effective Control (SOEC) framework, which is followed in the airline industry globally, a carrier that flies overseas from a particular country should be substantially owned by that country's government or its nationals.

Currently, NRIs can acquire only 49 per cent in Air India. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the airline is also 49 per cent through the government approval route.

As per the existing norms, 100 per cent FDI is permitted in scheduled domestic carriers, subject to certain conditions, including that it would not be applicable for overseas airlines.

In the case of scheduled airlines, 49 per cent FDI is permitted through automatic approval route and any such investment beyond that level requires government nod.

On January 27, the government came out witha Preliminary Information Memorandum (PIM) for Air India disinvestment. It has proposed selling 100 per cent stake in Air India along with budget airline Air India Express and the national carrier's 50 per cent stake in AISATS, an equal joint venture with Singapore Airlines.

Under the latest disinvestment plan, the successful bidder would have to take over only debt worth Rs 23,286.5 crore while the liabilities would be decided depending on current assets at the time of closing of the transaction.

This is the second attempt by the government in as many years to divest Air India, which has been in the red for long.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.