'Is it a crime to ask for salaries?' ask Kingfisher employees

October 6, 2012

kingfisher-vigil

Mumbai, October 6: "Asking for salaries is not a crime ", shouts one banner. The other poster questions, "Is your party over Mr Mallya?" Yet another hollers, "Criminal Executive Officer, Go Away!" Around 150 odd engineers, pilots and cabin crew of the Kingfisher Airlines marched with them.

Wearing black armbands, the group meandered from Terminal 1A at Mumbai's domestic airport to Kingfisher House, the airline's corporate office in the city.

A protest in the shadow of a suicide. Yesterday Sushmita Chakravarty, wife of Manas Chakravarty hung herself at her residence in south-west Delhi. Depressed since a year, she wrote about the financial strain beating down on the family since her husband had not been paid for six months.

"It's tragic," said a captain who specified that he does not want to be named. "What's worse is that the management has not even bothered to condole the family. The apathy and the utter disregard has made us very angry. That's why I came today to express my protest."

"We can't let anything like this happen again. I have come here to tell my colleagues and their families, you are not alone. We are all in this together," said a cabin crew member who also did not want to be named. Employed with the airline since its inception in 2005, she said she does not want to quit. "You have no idea about the pressure we are under from our families to quit. But does anyone understand that we have invested our time and life in this company, what about that?" she asked.

She said there are around 800 to 1000 odd cabin crew at three bases in Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore. Unlike the pilots and engineers of Kingfisher, the cabin crew is still a disparate group.

250 odd pilots of Kingfisher and around 270 engineers are attempting to form two associations to organise themselves better in this crisis. They are yet to register them. A lack of unity has cost them before, and they are unwilling to take any chances now. Earlier strikes by employees fizzled out as groups in each base took unilateral decisions. Since December 2011 Kingfisher has witnessed several strikes, mostly by pilots, many hardly lasting for a few hours let alone days.

"If we want our salaries, we have to become one group. We have to fight as one," says a young engineer, one more person refusing to give his name. "You can say I am from Kingfisher engineering staff."

Right at the head of the march was Shruti, a technician. She was among the few who dares to disclose her identity. "I stopped coming to office because I have no money to travel. Can anyone imagine not having salary for seven months and somehow carrying on? How? I have EMIs to pay. I have to support my parents back home in Kolkata. I have borrowed from friends and I need to pay them. What to do?" the exasperation in her voice conveying more than the words themselves.

Earning around Rs. 40,000 a month, Shruti hopes the company will pay her dues. "God knows what Vijay Mallya will do," she said finally before her colleagues whisk her away.

While everyone marched together, they formed little groups when they reached the Kingfisher House. Pilots converged among themselves, senior engineers huddled together while the technicians all fanned out at the fringes. And the concerns of each group varied. While unpaid salary remained a central theme, for each group the nuances differed.

"You know they have not given us our form 16 since months? How are we to manage our affairs? And they have defaulted on Provident Fund too," said a senior captain on the company's airbus fleet.

"I left a stable government job in the east of the country to join this very lucrative commercial carrier. Who knew there would come a time, I would have to protest to get my salary and form 16s," he laughed, but refused to be named.

A group of young technicians were not so worried about their Form 16s. "First, let them deposit our salary, let me pay off my rent and debts, then I will worry about paperwork," said one of them.

Technicians maintain and repair aircrafts and its parts. Their starting salaries range from Rs. 12,000 to Rs. 60,000, while the engineers can earn anywhere from over a lakh to two and a half lakh rupees per month.

Why don't they quit? Surely it's better than the uncertainty? Pulkit Deka, an engineer said, "The job market is saturated." His friend said, "So many Kingfisher engineers have quit. They are all out there waiting to be absorbed somewhere. Other airlines know this, so they are offering lower salaries. If we quit here we lose our salary, they will not pay us at all. If we join there we don't get our worth. We are stuck."

And so is Kingfisher Airlines. Today the aviation regulator - Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) - has sent a notice asking why should its license not be cancelled or suspended. While the company's lenders offered it around 60 odd crore rupees yesterday to tide over the current crisis and get people back to work, the money will only pay about two months' salary of its staff. Employees, on the other hand, are adamant that they won't go back until they get all their pending dues. Since Wednesday, they have boycotted every attempt of the management to talk to them on the issue.

The airline management, now hemmed in, has extended its partial lockout until October 12.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 24,2020

New Delhi, Jun 24: A litre of diesel on Wednesday was more expensive than a litre of petrol after the price of the former was hiked by 48 paise on the 18th successive day of fuel price revisions. While petrol price remained unchanged for the first time since June 7, diesel prices maintained upward trajectory to touch new highs.

It is for the first time in Delhi that diesel has become more expensive than petrol. A litre of the fuel now costs ₹79.88 as against ₹79.76 for a litre of petrol, as per a report in news agency ANI.

While surging fuel prices may generate much-needed revenue for governments, it would also have a detrimental impact on household budgets. The spike in diesel prices also has a wider impact on the transport and agricultural sectors which are largely dependent on the fuel.

The widest gap between the prices of the two fuels was on June 18 of 2012 when a litre of petrol was at ₹71.16 in Delhi while diesel was at ₹40.91. On June 28, the gap between the two fuels was 31.17 per litre in Mumbai. Around that time, there was a spurt in sales of diesel passenger vehicles while demand for such vehicles has come down significantly in current times. This has also led many manufacturers to ditch diesel engines completely.

The current trend of fuel price hikes are unlikely to do demand for petrol vehicles much good either.

Daily price revisions of the two fuel had been temporarily halted for 83 days till it was resumed on June 7.

India's demand for fuel doubled in May and has been steadily rising in June with the easing of restrictions. Indian refineries have already scaled up crude processing with Indian Oil Corp, the country's top refiner, looking to operate its plants at about 90% capacity in June.

The rising fuel prices, however, have resulted in political uproar with Congress leading the charge against the central government and accusing it of penalising consumers by imposing high taxes. A demand for including fuel prices under Goods and Services Tax (GST) has also been renewed by many but it is highly unlikely that it would happen. With oil companies looking to cut back on their previous loses and governments - central as well as states - aiming to generate revenue after tumultous weeks of lockdown, fuel price hikes are likely to stay till at least the end of June.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 25,2020

New Delhi, Jun 25: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre and the CBSE to issue fresh notification in connection with Class 12 exams, clarifying the option between internal assessment and exams later.

The observation from the top court after it was informed that the CBSE has decided to cancel the remaining board exams for Class 10 and Class 12.

A bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna asked the Centre to clarify the issue of taking the option between internal assessment and exams later.

"Clarify the date of results," said the bench, noting that the CBSE will have to submit a fresh draft notification cancelling class 12 Board exams and affidavit on Friday morning, before the top court continues to hear the matter again at 10.30 a.m.

The apex court also sought clarity on the beginning of the new academic year.

It told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, that the CBSE is willing to conduct exams when the situation is conducive, but this may vary from state to state. "Will the decision be taken by a central authority or will the state government take the decision? How are you going to deal with that situation?"

Mehta replied that the decision must be taken according to the situation. To this, the bench said should not the solution be pan-India?

"You have not said when you will decide on this issue, and when you will take stock of these things. Some time frame will have to be given," noted the bench.

Continuing its queries, the bench said: "What about state regional board exams... the CBSE does not hold all the exams. The state Board is also there."

Mehta replied that the instructions from the controller of examinations are that exams are controlled centrally. "State boards assist the CBSE," he replied.

The bench observed that the government should modify the draft notification and include the state board issue. "Clear the stand that decision will be taken at the central level and not at the state level... other courses will have to be delayed till CBSE exam results come out," it said.

Mehta replied the assessment results will be published now, and if a student wants to opt to give the exam, then that will be conducted later. The top court asked Mehta to bring this on record and redraft the notification.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 12,2020

New Delhi, Mar 12: The Supreme Court told the Uttar Pradesh government on Thursday that as of now, there was no law that could back their action of putting up roadside posters of those accused of vandalism during anti-CAA protests in Lucknow.

An apex court bench refused to stay the March 9 Allahabad High Court order directing the Yogi Adityanath administration to remove the posters.

The top court, which grilled the Uttar Pradesh government for putting up such posters in public, described the plea as a matter that needed "further elaboration and consideration".

A vacation bench of justices U U Lalit and Aniruddha Bose said a "bench of sufficient strength" would consider next week the Uttar Pradesh government's appeal against the Allahabad High Court order directing the state administration to remove the posters of those accused of vandalism during anti-CAA protests.

It directed the apex court registry to put up the case file before Chief Justice of India (CJI) S A Bobde so that a "bench of sufficient strength can be constituted at the earliest to hear and consider" the case next week.

During the hearing, the bench told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, that it was a matter of "great importance".

It asked Mehta whether the state government had the power to put up such posters.

The top court, however, said there was no doubt that action should be taken against rioters and they should be punished.

Mehta told the court that the posters were put up as a "deterrent" and the hoardings only said that these persons were liable to pay for their alleged acts during the violence.

Senior advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for former IPS officer S R Darapuri whose poster has also been affixed in Lucknow, told the bench that the state was duty-bound to show the authority of law backing its action.

He said the action of the Uttar Pradesh government amounted to a "mega blanket" approach of naming and shaming these persons without final adjudication and it was an open invitation to common men to lynch them as the posters also had their addresses and photographs.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.