'Is it a crime to ask for salaries?' ask Kingfisher employees

October 6, 2012

kingfisher-vigil

Mumbai, October 6: "Asking for salaries is not a crime ", shouts one banner. The other poster questions, "Is your party over Mr Mallya?" Yet another hollers, "Criminal Executive Officer, Go Away!" Around 150 odd engineers, pilots and cabin crew of the Kingfisher Airlines marched with them.

Wearing black armbands, the group meandered from Terminal 1A at Mumbai's domestic airport to Kingfisher House, the airline's corporate office in the city.

A protest in the shadow of a suicide. Yesterday Sushmita Chakravarty, wife of Manas Chakravarty hung herself at her residence in south-west Delhi. Depressed since a year, she wrote about the financial strain beating down on the family since her husband had not been paid for six months.

"It's tragic," said a captain who specified that he does not want to be named. "What's worse is that the management has not even bothered to condole the family. The apathy and the utter disregard has made us very angry. That's why I came today to express my protest."

"We can't let anything like this happen again. I have come here to tell my colleagues and their families, you are not alone. We are all in this together," said a cabin crew member who also did not want to be named. Employed with the airline since its inception in 2005, she said she does not want to quit. "You have no idea about the pressure we are under from our families to quit. But does anyone understand that we have invested our time and life in this company, what about that?" she asked.

She said there are around 800 to 1000 odd cabin crew at three bases in Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore. Unlike the pilots and engineers of Kingfisher, the cabin crew is still a disparate group.

250 odd pilots of Kingfisher and around 270 engineers are attempting to form two associations to organise themselves better in this crisis. They are yet to register them. A lack of unity has cost them before, and they are unwilling to take any chances now. Earlier strikes by employees fizzled out as groups in each base took unilateral decisions. Since December 2011 Kingfisher has witnessed several strikes, mostly by pilots, many hardly lasting for a few hours let alone days.

"If we want our salaries, we have to become one group. We have to fight as one," says a young engineer, one more person refusing to give his name. "You can say I am from Kingfisher engineering staff."

Right at the head of the march was Shruti, a technician. She was among the few who dares to disclose her identity. "I stopped coming to office because I have no money to travel. Can anyone imagine not having salary for seven months and somehow carrying on? How? I have EMIs to pay. I have to support my parents back home in Kolkata. I have borrowed from friends and I need to pay them. What to do?" the exasperation in her voice conveying more than the words themselves.

Earning around Rs. 40,000 a month, Shruti hopes the company will pay her dues. "God knows what Vijay Mallya will do," she said finally before her colleagues whisk her away.

While everyone marched together, they formed little groups when they reached the Kingfisher House. Pilots converged among themselves, senior engineers huddled together while the technicians all fanned out at the fringes. And the concerns of each group varied. While unpaid salary remained a central theme, for each group the nuances differed.

"You know they have not given us our form 16 since months? How are we to manage our affairs? And they have defaulted on Provident Fund too," said a senior captain on the company's airbus fleet.

"I left a stable government job in the east of the country to join this very lucrative commercial carrier. Who knew there would come a time, I would have to protest to get my salary and form 16s," he laughed, but refused to be named.

A group of young technicians were not so worried about their Form 16s. "First, let them deposit our salary, let me pay off my rent and debts, then I will worry about paperwork," said one of them.

Technicians maintain and repair aircrafts and its parts. Their starting salaries range from Rs. 12,000 to Rs. 60,000, while the engineers can earn anywhere from over a lakh to two and a half lakh rupees per month.

Why don't they quit? Surely it's better than the uncertainty? Pulkit Deka, an engineer said, "The job market is saturated." His friend said, "So many Kingfisher engineers have quit. They are all out there waiting to be absorbed somewhere. Other airlines know this, so they are offering lower salaries. If we quit here we lose our salary, they will not pay us at all. If we join there we don't get our worth. We are stuck."

And so is Kingfisher Airlines. Today the aviation regulator - Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) - has sent a notice asking why should its license not be cancelled or suspended. While the company's lenders offered it around 60 odd crore rupees yesterday to tide over the current crisis and get people back to work, the money will only pay about two months' salary of its staff. Employees, on the other hand, are adamant that they won't go back until they get all their pending dues. Since Wednesday, they have boycotted every attempt of the management to talk to them on the issue.

The airline management, now hemmed in, has extended its partial lockout until October 12.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 13,2020

New Delhi, Feb 13: The BJP's Amit Shah today said statements like "goli maaro" and "Indo-Pak match" should not have been made by BJP leaders ahead of the Delhi elections.

The BJP may have suffered in the elections because of hate statements made by party leaders, he said, reported news agency Press Trust of India.

The party, he said, had distanced itself from such remarks.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 21,2020

New Delhi, Jan 21: With the IMF lowering India's economic growth estimate for the current fiscal to 4.8 per cent, senior Congress leader P Chidambaram on Tuesday claimed an attack on the world body and its chief economist Gita Gopinath by government ministers was imminent.

He also alleged that the growth figure of 4.8 per cent given by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is after some "window dressing" and he won't be surprised if it goes even lower.

"Reality check from IMF. Growth in 2019-20 will be BELOW 5 per cent at 4.8 per cent," Chidambaram said in a series of tweets.

"Even the 4.8 per cent is after some window dressing. I will not be surprised if it goes even lower," the former finance minister said.

IMF Chief Economist Gopinath was one of the first to denounce demonetisation, he noted.

"I suppose we must prepare ourselves for an attack by government ministers on the IMF and Dr Gita Gopinath," Chidambaram said.

The IMF lowered India's economic growth estimate for the current fiscal to 4.8 per cent and listed the country's much lower-than-expected GDP numbers as the single biggest drag on its global growth forecast for two years.

In October, the IMF had pegged India economic growth at 6.1 per cent for 2019.

Listing decline in rural demand growth and an overall credit sluggishness for lowering of India forecasts, Gopinath, however, had said the growth momentum should improve next year due to factors like positive impact of corporate tax rate reduction.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 24,2020

New Delhi, Jul 24: The Delhi High Court on Friday asked the ICMR to come out with a clarification that mobile number, government-issued identity card, photographs or even a residential proof ought not to be insisted upon for Covid-19 test of mentally ill homeless persons.

According to an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) advisory of June 19, every person who was to be tested for Covid-19 has to provide a government-issued identity proof and should have a valid phone number for tracing and tracking the individual and his/her contacts.

A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan said that ICMR should issue a clarification by way of a circular or an official order that the identity proof, address proof and mobile number are not required for testing mentally ill homeless persons.

The high court said a camp can be organised for testing such persons as is being done across Delhi for others.

"Guidelines have to be given by you (ICMR). You put it in black and white for the states'' benefit. You only need to clarify in two-three lines that mobile number, address proof and identity cards are not required for testing mentally ill homeless persons," it said.

"Use your powers for the public at large. Once you do so (issue the clarification), all states will comply," the bench added.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for ICMR, sought time to take instructions from the government regarding the observations made by the bench.

The high court, thereafter, listed the matter for further hearing on August 7.

The bench was hearing a PIL moved by advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal seeking directions to ICMR and Delhi government to issue guidelines for Covid-19 testing of mentally ill homeless persons in the national capital.

Coronavirus India update: State-wise total number of confirmed cases, deaths on July 24

The high court on July 9 had asked the ICMR to consider the plight of the mentally ill homeless persons and see whether they can be tested without insisting upon a mobile number, government issue identity card and residential address proof.

The bench had said to ICMR that many homeless mentally ill persons are institutionalised or in shelter homes and therefore, traceable, so there was no need for their identity proof or phone numbers to test them for Covid-19.

In response to the court''s query, ICMR has filed an affidavit stating that the purpose behind the submission of government identity card and telephone number was to ensure proper tracking and treatment of positive cases and their contacts as ''Test/Track/Treat'' is the best strategy for control of Covid-19 pandemic. 

It further said that since health was a state subject, the concerned state health authority may consider adopting a suitable protocol to ensure that the strategy of ''Test/Track/Treat'' is followed and the grievance raised in the PIL is also addressed.

ICMR, in its affidavit, has said that it has only advised facilitating contact tracing as well as tracking of the Covid-19 infected patients.

"The modalities regarding the contact tracing as well as tracking of the Covid-19 infected patients completely falls under the domain of IDSP. NCDC and state health authorities. 

"ICMR is a research organization and the contact tracing, as well as tracking of the Covid-19 infected patients, is not under the domain of ICMR," it has said in its affidavit.

Bansal has claimed in his petition that the Delhi government has not taken seriously the lack of guidelines with respect to Covid-19 testing of mentally ill homeless persons.

Coronavirus Worldometer | 15 countries with the highest number of cases, deaths due to the Covid-19 pandemic

He has said the high court had on June 9 directed it to address the grievances raised by him in another PIL with regard to mentally ill homeless persons in accordance with law, rules, regulations and government policy.

He said that on June 13 he also sent a representation to the Chief Secretary of Delhi government for providing treatment to mentally ill homeless persons in the national capital who have no residence proof. 

However, nothing was done by the Delhi government, he had told the court.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.