Mecca over Marx: CPM leader Rezzak Mollah goes on Haj

October 19, 2012
Rezzak-Mollah

Kolkata, October 19: A West Bengal CPM stalwart is on a pilgrimage to Mecca. Days ahead of embarking on Haj, Abdur Rezzak Mollah, credited for sounding an early warning on the Left Front's disastrous land acquisition policy, insisted his faith in Karl Marx figured way below his absolute devotion to Allah and Prophet Mohammed.

Mollah was land and land reforms minister in the Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee government. Even as minister, he never minced words against the CM's line on Nandigram and Singur that ultimately caused the Left's spectacular electoral crash. The Canning East MLA had distanced himself from the policy, saying he wasn't kept in the loop.

Among the few CPM leaders who held their seats in the face of the crushing Mamata typhoon, Mollah was appointed party whip. A vocal critic of Bhattacharjee and then industries minister Nirupam Sen, he had claimed the rich and the powerful controlled the party that had drifted far from its ideological moorings.

A veteran in a party that swears by the credo religion is the opium of the masses, Mollah said he wasn't entirely disillusioned, but was convinced that a world free of exploitation was utopia. He was bitter and criticized the CPM saying: "Our party has no leaders. It only has managers." Party general secretary Prakash Karat was one such.

Years ago, another party senior, Late Benoy Chowdhury, had fetched up at Tirupati with his newlywed. The couple had apparently been seen near the shrine. A furious party had sought an explanation. But those were days when iron-clad dogma ruled CPM.

But Mollah said he has no qualms about going on Haj. There was no contradiction between ideology and his desire and he didn't feel a sense of guilt. "Now, it's normal for a Communist to be a believer in his personal life. That's the reality. We live in a parliamentary democracy. There's no way you can deny the importance of identity politics. There are many hypocrites in this party - Communists who get their children's wedding registered, but hold traditional religious ceremonies as well."

And how did the party respond to his pilgrimage wish? State secretary Biman Bose made his disapproval clear. But Mollah said he told his party boss: "If you insist, I'll not go. But everyone knows I'm going. If I drop out, people will ask questions. I'll tell them I abided by your instructions." Bose understood the implications and asked Mollah to submit an application to the party secretariat, which was approved. The request letter didn't mention the word Haj. It merely said Mollah wanted to go on a trip to Mecca.

As for his old grouse against Bhattacharjee and Sen, he was blunt as ever. They should have taken responsibility for the whitewash and bowed out. Or else, the party should have given them the sack. Neither of this has happened. "I'm no party leader. I'm an ordinary cadre. The party has relieved me of leadership responsibilities. I'm happy and healthy."

He rated Mamata Banerjee higher than Bhattacharjee as CM. But that was not because of his extreme personal dislike of his party colleague. "Mamata knows how to take decisions and, more importantly, to stick to them, no matter what the pressures are. She does what she thinks is best. That's how a leader ought to be." Bhattacharjee, Mollah said, vacillated. He took a step forward and two back. Arrogance got him. He lost touch with the common man, never had an ear to the ground. Even partymen hesitated to go close to him.

But in Mecca, Mollah said, he'd pray for Bhattacharjee, Sen and the party. He insisted he never forgot his Muslim identity. "It's my duty to be devoted to the faith I was born into and I make it a point not to skip the Eid namaz. My faith in the almighty was always hundred per cent. That's the way it shall be. I got married the traditional way. It was a nikah."


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 4,2020

New Delhi, Feb 4: Saying the matter had been adjourned many times and it will have to hear it someday, the Supreme Court on Tuesday fixed April 14 for hearing a plea by Zakia Jafri, wife of slain MP Ehsan Jafri, challenging the SIT's clean chit to then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 riots.

A bench comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari posted the matter for hearing in April after Zakia's counsel sought an adjournment and urged the court to post it after the Holi vacation.

When advocate Aparna Bhat, appearing for Zakia, told the court that the issue in the matter is contentious, the bench said, "It has been adjourned so many times, whatever it is, we will have to hear it someday. Take one date and make sure you all are available." Zakia had filed a petition in the apex court in 2018 challenging the Gujarat High Court's October 5, 2017 order rejecting her plea against the decision of the Special Investigation Team.

Ehsan Jafri was among the 68 people killed at Gulberg Society on February 28, 2002, a day after the S-6 Coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt at Godhra killing 59 people and triggering riots in Gujarat.

On February 8, 2012, the SIT filed a closure report giving a clean chit to Modi and 63 others, including senior government officials, saying there was "no prosecutable evidence" against them.

Comments

Althaf
 - 
Tuesday, 4 Feb 2020

No use.. will Supreme court gives justice??? 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 23,2020

Rajghat, Feb 23: The maternal uncle of Dr Kafeel Khan, who was recently arrested for allegedly making inflammatory statements during anti-CAA protests, was shot dead in front of his house at Bankatichak in Rajghat area, police said on Sunday.

Dr Nusratullah Warsi aka Dada (55), a property dealer, was shot dead on Saturday night at about 10:45 pm and an FIR against two people was filed in this connection on a written complaint of his family members.

According to police, it appears to be a case of murder due to monetary and property dispute and they are searching for both the accused.

Dr Kafeel Khan, suspended doctor of Gorakhpur BRD Medical College, was last month arrested under charges of giving a provocative speech during a protest against the CAA and NRC at Aligarh Muslim University and was later charged with the National Security Act.

Warsi on Saturday evening had gone to his lawyer Siraj Tariq's house, a few metres away from his own house, and was returning home on foot when a man shot him in his head, killing him on the spot.

"On the written complaint of family members, case of murder against one Imammuddin and Anil Sonkar has been registered and police has initiated probe and is searching for both the accused. Police met the women in their house and is interrogating them," Circle Officer VP Singh said.

Prima facie it appears to be a case of property and money dispute, he said, adding, three teams have been constituted to investigate the case and soon the accused will be caught.

Dr Kafeel Khan had last month raised apprehension in a Mumbai court about being killed in an "encounter" by the Uttar Pradesh police after claiming that he had been "falsely" implicated in the case by them.

The paediatrician had come to the limelight in 2017 when a controversy broke out after the death of over 60 children in less than a week at the BRD Medical College in Gorakhpur in Uttar Pradesh, where he was posted.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 18,2020

Mumbai, Feb 18: A group of citizens on Tuesday demanded a thorough inquiry into the death of special CBI judge Brijgopal Harkishan Loya in 2014.

The group has written a letter to Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, seeking a time-bound probe into the death of Loya.

Loya, who was hearing the high-profile Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case of Gujarat, died of a cardiac arrest in Nagpur on December 1, 2014, when he had gone to attend the wedding of a colleague's daughter.

Social activist Ashok Pai, addressing a press conference on behalf of the group, also demanded proper compensation for the judge's family, saying he was on an "official" tour.

Pai said on Tuesday he met NCP president Sharad Pawar, whose party is a key constituent of the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government in Maharashtra, and raised these demands with him.

Pawar assured to look into the demands, he said at the press conference at the Mumbai Marathi Patrakar Sangh.

"We have handed over a letter to Maharashtra Assembly speaker Nana Patole and dispatched a copy of the letter to Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray (seeking a probe into Loya's death)," Pai said.

As the matter relates to "mysterious" death of a sitting judge of the CBI, all facts about it must be made public after a detailed and time-bound probe, Pai said.

The Loya death case had reached the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court had held that Loya had died of "natural causes" and had rejected PILs seeking an SIT probe into the death, questioning their motive.

The SC had held that petitions were moved by political rivals to settle scores which was a serious attempt to scandalise the judiciary and obstruct the course of justice through a "frontal attack" on its independence.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.