Implementation of LPG cylinder cap fuels chaos, confusion over KYC

December 7, 2012

Cylindr

New Delhi, December 7: Shoddy implementation of the government's new quota system for subsidized cooking gas has resulted in chaos. There's utter confusion about how many subsidized cylinders a consumer is entitled to in the remaining six months of 2012-13 since the new scheme was announced on September 13, 2012.

That day's government release was unambiguous. It said: "The number of subsidized LPG cylinders available to each consumer in the remaining part of the current financial year will be three."

But some dealers believe that consumers have already run out of their quota, while some others insist that unless consumers fill up the KYC form, cylinders can't be given to them.

Similarly, there's confusion over what it takes to fill up the KYC ( know-your-customer) form. Ask Ananya Gupta of Mumbai's Matunga. She was suddenly asked to produce her marriage certificate, PAN card, bank account details and the original registration book by her dealer for her KYC form or face discontinuation of gas supply.

Original registration book? Is that the blue book that most consumers have misplaced? Questions such as these are redundant because the KYC form makes no such demand. It requires two things: ID proof and address proof. And for this driving licence, passport, ration card, phone or electricity bill, Adhaar card and several other ordinary things will suffice.

But dealers don't know or pretend not to know. P N Seth, vice-president of All-India LPG Dealers' Association, for instance, doesn't know about the three-cylinder quota in the six remaining months of the year since September. He said, "Most consumers have completed their quota and are now buying non-subsidized gas."

All-India Indane Distributors' Association president A Ramachandran said consumers were "not cooperating".

He said, "If they don't submit the KYC form by year end (the new deadline), the connections would be blocked."

An Indane dealer in Anna Salai helpfully added: "Once a connection is blocked, it can only be unlocked after government permission."

In this confusion over gas supplies, a black market in cylinders is flourishing. Some consumers said they were buying cylinders well above the non-subsidized price range of Rs 885-950 band (depending on VAT) per cylinder.

A consumer in Delhi's Alaknanda area, Mitashi Saxena, was unsure about whether she was required to fill a KYC form or not, and wondered whether she would get subsidized cylinders next year.

"We're a family of eight and have two kitchens. But we still don't know whether we need to fill the form. And our distributor doesn't seem to know either,'' she said. Another resident complains of delayed service.

For people in hill states like J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, where families need more fuel to keep warm, it's going to be a winter of discontent. "We've not been contacted by our dealer and run out of out quota. We're planning to spend some time with relatives in the plains," said Shivani Joshi of Nainital.

In Chandigarh, too, large families that don't have separate kitchens on different floors, have been jolted by the new condition. Federation of Chandigarh sector welfare association chairman P C Sanghi said the decision is against Indian tradition of large joint families. Consumer rights activist Arvind Thakur said, "A bigger issue is that building byelaws are so stringent in Chandigarh that people can't even think of building a separate kitchen."

Lucknow housewife Rita Singh spent several tense days when the cylinder did not fetch up even eight days after booking — as against the normal period of 48 hours.

"When I asked, they said most of their staff was engaged in KYC verification," she said.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 13,2020

New Delhi, Feb 13: The BJP's Amit Shah today said statements like "goli maaro" and "Indo-Pak match" should not have been made by BJP leaders ahead of the Delhi elections.

The BJP may have suffered in the elections because of hate statements made by party leaders, he said, reported news agency Press Trust of India.

The party, he said, had distanced itself from such remarks.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 14,2020

New Delhi, Jan 14: The curative petitions of Vinay Sharma and Mukesh, who were sentenced to death in the Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case, was on Tuesday rejected by a five-judge Supreme Court Bench led by Justice N.V. Ramana.

In a three-page order, the Bench concluded, after an in chamber consideration that began about 1.45 p.m., that there was no merit in their pleas to spare them from the gallows.

“We have gone through the curative petitions and relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra versus Ashok Hurra. Hence, the curative petitions are dismissed,” the court held.

Curative is a rare remedy devised by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in its judgment in the Rupa Ashok Hurra case in 2002. A party can take only two limited grounds in a curative petition - one, he was not heard by the court before the adverse judgment was passed, and two, the judge was biased. A curative plea, which follows the dismissal of review petition, is the last legal avenue open for convicts in the Supreme Court. Sharma was the first among the four convicts to file a curative.

The Bench also rejected their pleas to stay the execution of their death sentence and for oral hearing in open court.

Besides Justice Ramana, the Bench comprised Arun Mishra, Rohinton Nariman, R. Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan.

Curative petitions were filed in the Supreme Court by both convicts on January 9. The petitions had come just days after a Delhi sessions court schedulled the execution of all the four convicts in Tihar jail on January 22.

Sharma and Mukesh, in separate curative petitions, argued that there was a “sea change” in the death penalty jurisprudence since their convictions. Carrying out the death sentence on such changed circumstances would be a “gross miscarriage of justice”.

In his plea, Sharma said the Court had commuted the death penalty in several rape and murder cases since 2017, when it first confirmed the death penalty to the Nirbhaya convicts.

“fter the pronouncement of judgment in 2017, there have been as many as 17 cases involving rape and murder in which various three-judge Benches of the Supreme Court have commuted the sentence of death,” the petition contended.

The Supreme Court recently dismissed a review petition filed by Akshay Singh, another of the four four condemned men, to review its May 5, 2017 judgment confirming the death penalty. It also refused his plea to grant him three weeks' time to file a mercy petition before the President of India.

A Bench led by Justice R. Banumathi had said it was open for the Nirbhaya case convicts to avail whatever time the law prescribes for the purpose of filing a mercy plea.

Akshay (33), Mukesh (30), Pawan Gupta (23) and Sharma (24) had brutally gang-raped a 23-year-old paramedical student in a moving bus on the intervening night of December 16-17, 2012. She died of her injuries a few days later.

The case shocked the nation and led to the tightening of anti-rape laws. Rape, especially gang rape, is now a capital crime.

One of the accused in the case, Ram Singh, allegedly committed suicide in the Tihar jail. A juvenile, who was among the accused, was convicted by a juvenile justice board. He was released from a reformation home after serving a three-year term.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 21,2020

Bengaluru, May 21: The top two food-delivery startups, Swiggy and Zomato, will begin delivering alcohol in some cities starting from today, as they cash in on the high demand for booze during the country's coronavirus lockdown.

India was among the few countries to restrict liquor and tobacco sales as it announced one of the world's strictest lockdowns in March.

Hundreds of people started queuing up at liquor stores earlier this month when the government eased some restrictions, leading the police to resort to baton-charges to disperse crowds in some cases.

The companies will roll out the service in select cities in Jharkhand, starting with Ranchi from today, Swiggy and Zomato said in separate statements.

Swiggy said it was in advanced talks with multiple states to launch the service in more locations, and both firms said the move to allow alcohol orders through smartphones will promote social distancing and customer safety.

"By enabling home delivery of alcohol, we can generate additional business for retail outlets while solving the problem of overcrowding," said Anuj Rathi, vice president of products at Bengaluru-based Swiggy.

The new service also comes as both Swiggy and Zomato face sharp declines in their core business, with restaurants remaining shut during the two-month lockdown, forcing the companies to cut hundreds of jobs to save cash.

News agency reported earlier this month that Zomato was aiming to branch out into delivering alcohol. Swiggy is backed by South African internet group Naspers Ltd, while Ant Financial, an affiliate of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, is a major investor in Zomato.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.