After GMR, Indian carmakers in deep waters in Sri Lanka

December 12, 2012

car_copy

New Delhi, Dec 12: After the Maldives, India’s economic interests are in deep waters in another neighbouring island nation, Sri Lanka.

 

Notwithstanding the setback in its efforts to help the GMR Group in the Maldives, New Delhi has now taken up the cudgels for Indian carmakers and urged Colombo to roll back the recent steep hikes in import duty on automobiles.

 

“The Indian High Commission in Colombo has taken up the matter with the Sri Lankan government. The issue will be discussed again when the Finance Secretary of Sri Lanka would travel to India,” said Syed Akbaruddin, Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), on Tuesday. Sri Lankan finance secretary Dr P B Jayasundera is set to visit India shortly.

 

The Sri Lankan government recently raised excise duty on imported utility vehicles from 100 per cent to 173 per cent. Duty on cars with less than 1000 cc engines was also raised from 120 per cent to 200 per cent, including a 47 per cent hike in excise duty.

 

The excise duty on both three-wheelers and two-wheelers were raised from 45 per cent and 61 per cent respectively to 100 per cent. Besides, an absolute levy of $ 845.95 was imposed on all commercial vehicles, in addition to an 12 per cent excise duty. Indian carmakers would be hit hard by the steep hike as the island nation is the largest export market, accounting to nearly 13 per cent of the total automobile export.

 

The Ministry of Commerce is understood to have sought the help of the MEA to take up the issue diplomatically with the Sri Lankan government.

 

Rajiv Kher, additional secretary in the Ministry of Commerce, on Monday said that New Delhi was concerned over the “very substantial rise in import tariff” by Sri Lank as the island nation on the Indian Ocean was a “very important market” for cars and commercial vehicles manufactured in India.

 

Lately, New Delhi has reacted very strongly to the Maldivian government’s decision to terminate its agreement with a consortium led by Indian infrastructure giant GMR Group to manage the international airport in an island close to the archipelagic nation’s capital Male. New Delhi warned Maldives about the repercussions their move could have on bilateral ties.

 

But a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore on December 6 ruled that the Maldivian government could take control of the airport from the GMR Male International Airport Limited or GMIAL, a joint venture of GMR Infrastructure and Malaysia Airports Holding Berhad.

 

The judgment came as a setback for the GMR Group that had earlier got an injunctive relief from the High Court of Singapore against the applicability and operations of the notice the Maldivian government had served the company on November 27 seeking to take back the control of the airport. India subtly toned down its rhetoric on Maldives move against GMIAL after the judgment.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 23,2020

New Delhi, Mar 20: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday appealed to state governments to ensure that rules and regulations of the coronavirus lockdown are enforced as he noted that many people are not taking the measure seriously.

"Many people are still not taking the lockdown seriously. Please save yourself, save your family, follow the instructions seriously. I request state governments to ensure rules and laws are followed," he said in a tweet in Hindi.

The Centre and state governments have decided to completely lock down 80 districts across the country where coronavirus cases have been reported.

Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala announced lockdown in many districts.

Delhi will be locked down from 6 am on March 23 till midnight on March 31.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 3,2020

Chennai, Mar 3: The Madras High Court has ruled that if a working woman gives birth to a child in the second delivery after twins in the first, she is not entitled to maternity benefits as it should be treated as third child.

"As per existing rules, a woman can avail such benefits only for her first two deliveries. Even otherwise it is debatable as to whether the delivery is not a second delivery but a third one, in as much as ordinarily when twins are born they are delivered one after another, and their age and their inter-se elderly status is also determined by virtue of the gap of time between their arrivals, which amounts to two deliveries and not one simultaneous act," the court said.

The first bench, comprising Chief Justice A P Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad stated this while allowing the appeal from Ministry of Home Affairs.

It set aside the order June 18 2019 order of a single Judge, who extended 180 days of maternity leave and other benefits to a woman member of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) under the rules governing the Tamil Nadu government servants.

The issue pertains to an appeal moved by the ministry, which contended that the leave claim is by a member of CISF to whom the maternity rules of Tamil Nadu would not apply.

She would be covered by the maternity benefits as provided under the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, the ministry said.

When the appeal came up for hearing, the bench said it found that a second delivery, which, in the present case, resulted in a third child, cannot be interpreted so as to add to the mathematical precision that is defined in the rules.

The admissibility of benefits would be limited if the claimant has not more than two children, the bench said "This fact therefore changes the entire nature of the relief which is sought for by the woman petitioner, which aspect has been completely overlooked by the single judge", the bench said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 28,2020

Hyderabad, Feb 28: The Cyber Crime Police of Hyderabad has registered an FIR against social media platforms- WhatsApp, Twitter and TikTok- for allowing people to spread anti-national activities, as per a complaint filed by one S Srishailam.

Raghuveer, Additional DCP Cyber Crimes said," We have received a court referred complaint, which was filed by S Srisailam in the concerned court stating that social media platforms Whatsapp, Twitter and TikTok are allowing few people to spread anti-national activities and videos."

S Srisailam also claimed that a few people are running a campaign against the CAA on social media platforms to spread hatred which in turn is causing damage to national integrity.

"In this regard, because the complaint was referred by a court a case has been registered against Whatsapp, Twitter & TikTok under the relevant section of Indian Penal Code and IT Act and took up the investigation," the DCP added.

He also added that the police cannot take action against these platforms as they are not banned in India but can initiate action against persons who intentionally indulge in spreading hatred.

"The police are conducting the investigation and if allegations of the complainant are found to be false then we will drop the case. We had received the case one week ago," informed the DCP.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.