New Delhi, Mar 2: A parliamentary committee has endorsed the government's decision not to treat "marital rape" as a sexual offence in the recently-promulgated anti-rape ordinance, agreeing that it could destroy the institution of marriage. However, the panel was silent on rape in live-in relationships, with many members of the view that treating it differently from other sexual offences was not possible in the absence of a law recognizing live-in arrangements.
Justifying the panel's recommendation to keep "marital rape" out of the purview of anti-rape laws, chairman of the standing committee on home affairs M Venkaiah Naidu said that leaving scope for the wife to accuse her husband of rape "has the potential of destroying the institution of marriage".
"In India, for ages, the family system has evolved ... Family is able to resolve the (marital) problems and there is also a provision under the law for cruelty against women, It was, therefore, felt that if marital rape is brought under the law, the entire family system will be under great stress and the committee may perhaps be doing more injustice," the parliamentary panel examining the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012, said in its report tabled on Friday.
Though some members of the panel like Raja (CPI) and Prasanta Chatterjee (CPI(M)), both of whom put in a dissent note, besides Kanimozhi (DMK) had insisted on some room for the wife to take up the issue of marital rape, arguing that consent in marriage was not "forever", the majority view was that if a wife was aggrieved, there were other means for her to move court. The reference was apparently to laws against cruelty to women. There were some suggestions that the wife's age mentioned in Section 375 be raised from 16 to 18 years, but Union home secretary RK Singh, while appearing before the panel, warned that this would outlaw marriages in many states in one stroke.
Even though the Supreme Court has, in several judgments since 2010, ruled long-term live-in relationships as legal and on par with marriage, the government is yet to enact a law recognizing live-ins and outlining the rights of live-in partners. The home secretary had conceded before the panel that dealing with rape charges brought against a man by his live-in partner, especially where the relationship failed to culminate into marriage, was a tricky issue as sexual consent was presumably based on the promise of marriage. The standing panel steered clear of taking a stand on the suggestion it had received against considering live-in relations as rape.
The panel received as many as 90 suggestions from individuals, women's bodies and states/UTs. Incidentally, only five states and UTs — Gujarat, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Puducherry and Dadra & Nagar Haveli — gave in their views.
New Delhi, Feb 4: Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, on Tuesday attacked the BJP over Anantkumar Hegde's controversial remark on Mahatma Gandhi and termed the party as "Ravan ke aulad" (children of Ravana). "Aaj ye Mahatma Gandhi ko gaali dete hain. Ye Ravan ke aulad hain. Ram ke pujari ka ye apmaan kar rahe hain (Today, they abuse Mahatma Gandhi. They are children of Ravan. They are insulting Lord Ram's devotee)," Chowdhury said.
Comments
Add new comment