Made-in-India label poses challenge for companies

[email protected] (Namrata Singh, TNN )
March 16, 2013

Made_in_IndiaMumbai, Mar 16: As Indian companies look to expand their footprint globally, and multinationals eye reverse innovations out of India, a certain provenance paradox appears to be posing a new challenge in this journey.

It's to do with the stereotypes consumers develop about products made in their country of origin. Consumers generally associate certain geographies with the product category. For instance, the best wine comes from France or the best chocolate comes from Switzerland. That in short is the provenance paradox.

Why this is becoming a major marketing and branding challenge for the next decade? Multinationals are increasingly looking at India for reverse innovation, while Indian groups are gunning to establish their presence in developed markets. But emerging markets are said to be developing faster than the stereotypes are eroding.

The concern is whether innovations emerging out of a developing market could get restricted to that zone alone. "Multinationals today are allocating resources to emerging markets to spur innovations out of emerging markets. But emerging market innovations for emerging markets is different while innovations from emerging markets to developed markets is a different ballgame," said Rohit Deshpande, a Sebastin S Kresge professor of marketing at Harvard Business School, who authored a paper on the provenance paradox.

Companies from emerging markets have had a hard time in the past establishing their brands in developed markets. "Typically, brands with labels from emerging markets such as India, Brazil, China have not got the kind of acceptability that brands from the developed markets have. The only brands which have perhaps managed to penetrate the developed markets are from markets like Japan and Korea — Sony, Samsung and LG. Usually, brands were created in emerging markets for emerging markets. Indian companies have realized how hard it is to establish a global brand," said Deshpande.

Multinationals, however, do not believe that the provenance paradox could become a major hurdle in their path of reverse innovation. According to Satyaki Ghosh, director, consumer products, L'Oreal India, the brand image is distinctly French and its brands are known for their quality and, hence, its Indian innovations are also seen in the same light.

"As a brand marketer, one's first loyalty is to the brand DNA and then one tries to get it closer to the local consumer. So, local innovation can still be a 360 degree one, with relevant formula for Indian consumers and the communication can be with Indian insight but the affinity of the brand still remains very French," said Ghosh.

Hindustan Unilever, on the other hand, has only recently started exporting Pureit water purifier, which is an Indian innovation, to Mexico and Brazil. How would the made-in-India tag play out for the brand when it enters a developed market such as Germany? "We do not position our brands from the country or origin. That's quite deliberate because we are a multinational. As far as we are concerned, it is about the product and the benefit it delivers," said Keith Weed, chief marketing and communications officer, Unilever.

Indian groups such as the Tatas have acquired global brands, which obviates the provenance paradox challenge altogether. A Tetley tea or a Jaguar Land Rover would be as well accepted by consumers in developed markets as in

developing markets. But acquisitions merely obscure the problem, they do not dissolve the existence of a provenance paradox.

"There is no magic formula or a shortcut to overcome the provenance paradox. It takes time and persistent effort — the Japanese have showed us that it is possible to overcome this issue; the Koreans are now doing the same. Indian companies can follow the example set by brands from these two countries. It is a question of focus — choosing the right segments to compete in and achieving world-class quality/excellence levels in the products/services being offered — sustained effort and time," said S P Shukla, president, group strategy and chief brand officer, Mahindra Group.

The problem relates to not much efforts put in by Indian companies to promote their corporate brands. "Infosys developed the global delivery model which is today being used by a number of other companies. Similarly, there is reverse innovation on learning. Many students are interested in starting their careers in India. The heroic deeds displayed by the Taj staff on 26/11 revealed the unique talent management processes at Taj which recruits people for their attitude and not for their grades. These are some examples that show that Indian companies need to promote their innovations globally so as to shed the image attached to the 'made in India' tag,'' said Deshpande.

The Mahindra Group attempted it when it provided complete IT support for the 2010 FIFA World cup.

Stereotypes regarding the country of origin, said Wilfried Aulbur, managing partner, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, can be surmounted by having adequate products. Experts believe the challenge for Indian companies is to go by past learnings and flip the coin in their favour.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 13,2020

New Delhi, Jan 13: The Supreme Court on Monday commenced hearing on issues related to discrimination against women in various religions and at religious places including Kerala's Sabarimala Temple.

A nine-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde said that it was not considering review pleas in the Sabarimala case.

“We are not hearing review pleas of Sabarimala case. We are considering issues referred to by a 5-judge bench earlier,” the bench said.

The apex court had on November 14 asked a larger bench to re-examine various religious issues, including the entry of women into the Sabarimala Temple and mosques and the practice of female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community.

While the five-judge bench unanimously agreed to refer religious issues to a larger bench, it gave a 3:2 split decision on petitions seeking a review of the apex court's September 2018 decision allowing women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala shrine in Kerala.

A majority verdict by then Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices A M Khanwilkar and Indu Malhotra decided to keep pending pleas seeking a review of its decision regarding entry of women into the shrine, and said restrictions on women in religious places was not restricted to Sabarimala alone and was prevalent in other religions as well.

The minority verdict by Justices R F Nariman and D Y Chandrachud gave a dissenting view by dismissing all review pleas and directing compliance of its September 28 decision.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
April 14,2020

New Delhi, Apr 14: Prime Minister Narendra Modi has announced the extension of a nationwide lockdown till May 3 to contain the spread of Covid-19 as the number of novel coronavirus cases surged past 10,000-mark on Tuesday. Hinting at partial relief, however, the Prime Minister said there could be some relaxations after April 20 in places where there is no hotspot.

Lockdown 2.0 will come into force from April 14 till May 3, PM Modi said in a televised address to the nation on Tuesday. The 19-day extension of the lockdown till May 3 is an attempt to contain the spread of novel coronavirus which has affected over 10,000 people in India. 

Even before #COVID19 cases touched 100, India made it compulsory for foreign returnees to remain in 14 days isolation. We imposed 21-day lockdown when we had 550 cases: PM Narendra Modi https://t.co/qi8MgG8qPQ

— ANI (@ANI) April 14, 2020
PM Modi said the Centre will closely monitor hotspots in states across India and added that those areas where there are no hotspots will get partial relief. “Till April 20, all districts, localities, states will be closely monitored, as to how strictly they are implementing norms. States where hotspots are contained could be allowed to resume some important activities, but with certain conditions,” the PM said.

The Prime Minister, in his address to India on Tuesday, began by lauding the efforts of Indians in the fight against novel coronavirus. “Covid-19 is spreading fast but India’s fight against coronavirus is going strong. It is because of your efforts that we are able to put up a fight,” the PM said as he thanked people for their co-operation.

PM Modi said, “People have gone through hardships to save India. I know how many difficulties you faced. I respectfully bow to the people of India for their sacrifice.”

The national lockdown first came into force from March 25 when the PM took an unprecedented measure in the fight against Covid-19. The lockdown was scheduled to end today.

STATES PUSHED FOR LOCKDOWN 2.0

The decision to extend the lockdown followed after a broad consensus emerged that the national lockdown should be extended by at least two weeks following a meeting between PM Modi and state chief ministers on Saturday.

It was reportedly after this meet with the Prime Minister that it was decided that the nationwide lockdown will be extended to tackle the spread of Coivid-19. The extension request from states came despite concerns that the shutdown will put millions out of work.

PM has taken correct decision to extend lockdown. Today, India’s position is better than many developed countries because we started lockdown early. If it is stopped now, all gains would be lost. To consolidate, it is imp to extend it

— Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) April 11, 2020
"If it is stopped now, all gains would be lost. To consolidate, it is imp (important) to extend it," Arvind Kejriwal had written on Twitter after the meeting while he added that PM Modi had "taken (a) correct decision to extend (the) lockdown”.

Several states had, however, pushed for resumption of some economic activities like in the farming sector in areas where no cases of the novel coronavirus have been reported.

ALL THAT HAS HAPPENED TILL NOW

Prime Minister Narendra Modi first addressed an anxious nation on March 19 as the coronavirus pandemic emerged as a serious concern for the country. In his televised address, the PM asked the people to observe ‘Janata Curfew’ for March 22.
The Prime Minister urged Indians to remain indoors as much as possible as he suggested ways to battle the coronavirus pandemic.

On March 24, the Prime Minister came back and announced a 21-day lockdown across the country. In his second address, PM Modi said the step was taken as it was the only way to break the chain of infection. The lockdown was to be in effect till April 14.

PM Modi later asked citizens to make noise at 5 pm to show their appreciation for medics, nurses and sanitation workers. This call was well received as Indians came out to clap, clang metal vessels and ring bells to cheer workers battling the spread of the coronavirus.

Ten days into the lockdown, the Prime Minister addressed the nation again and asked people to light candles, lamps and hold mobile phone torches for nine minutes from 9 pm on April 5 to demonstrate a collective will to fight coronavirus.

As of Tuesday morning, the death toll due to coronavirus has climbed to 339 with over 50 deaths within 24 hours. The number of cases in the country, meanwhile, had crossed the 10,000-mark, according to the Union Health Ministry. Over a thousand have been cured and discharged.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 24,2020

Indore, Jan 24: Around 80 Muslim leaders of the BJP in Madhya Pradesh on Friday resigned from the primary membership of the party in protest over the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, calling it a "divisive" measure.

One of the leaders, Rajik Qureshi Farshiwala, said around 80 Muslim partymen have resigned from the BJP's primary membership after writing to the newly-appointed national president, J P Nadda, on Thursday.

These leaders, who dubbed the CAA "a divisive provision made on religious grounds", include several office- bearers of the BJP's minority cell, he said.

"It was becoming increasingly difficult for us to participate in our community's events after the CAA came into existence (in December 2019).

"At these events, people used to curse us and ask us how long we plan to keep quiet on a divisive law like the CAA?" he said.

"Persecuted refugees of any community should get Indian citizenship. You cannot decide that a particular person is an intruder or a terrorist merely on the basis of religion," Farshiwala added.

In their letter, the Muslim leaders stated, "Citizens have right to equality under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. But the BJP-led Central Government is implementing the CAA on religious grounds.

"This is an act of dividing the country and against the basic spirit of the Constitution."

Some of the leaders who have resigned are considered close to BJP general secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya.

When asked about the development, Vijayvargiya on Thursday evening said, "I am not aware of the matter. But we will explain (about the CAA) if a person is being misled."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.