A father’s enduring battle to free his son from prison

August 15, 2013

SAMISFATHER1

Bijapur, Aug 15: One more year passes by and 63-year-old Rajahmed Bagewadi’s hope to celebrate Id with his son is dashed. For five years, Mr. Bagewadi has been waiting for his son Mohammad Sami to return home from jail where he is incarcerated on terrorism charges.

The ageing but doughty father has relentlessly tried to get his son freed as he believes he has been wrongly implicated.

Sami (26), a student of B.E (Arch), was first arrested by the Bangalore police on September 13, 2008, and then by the Gujarat police on July 16, 2009, on charges of involvement in the serial bomb blasts in Bangalore, Ahmedabad and Surat in July 2008.

“Since my son’s arrest on September 13, 2008, I have not had a day’s peaceful sleep. Proving his innocence has become the only objective in my life,” he said.

Sami was released by the Special Court in Karnataka on November 12, 2011, as the investigating officer H.M. Omkaraiah said the police did not find any evidence against him.

Recalling the arrest, Mr. Bagewadi said: “We were all waiting to break fast on the evening of September 13. My son’s phone was switched off and we were unable to reach him. We contacted his college and the officials said Sami had been taken by the Bangalore police.”

“Sub-inspector Deepak, then with the Cubbon Park police station, had picked up my son,” the father said.

The police later seized his son’s camera, laptop and computer. Since then, Mr. Bagewadi, a retired senior auditor, has meticulously collected documents in an attempt to prove his son’s innocence.

“The police filed three charge-sheets; in the first my son was the first accused. A few days later, six more were arrested, and my son was pushed to seventh place in the list of accused. In the third, his name was deleted from the charge-sheet. Mr. Omkaraiah also submitted a report to the court explaining why charges against Sami were dropped,” he said.

The Special Court ordered Sami’s release on November 12, 2011. But by then, Sami had been taken from the Bangalore prison by the Gujarat police on July 16, 2009 in connection with the Gujarat blasts. From then until his release by the Bangalore court, Sami had attended all his hearings through video conference from Gujarat.

The Gujarat police told the court that Sami had been present in Gujarat in the last week of December 2007 to attend a meeting of conspirators linked to the blasts.

Mr. Bagewadi said his son had been home writing exams at the time. Getting details under Right to Information (RTI) Act from Visvesvaraya Technological University, he said Sami wrote exams on December 24, 29, and 31. “How can my son have been present at the same time in Bijapur and in Gujarat?” he asked.

Quoting from the charge-sheet, Mr. Bagewadi said while there are details alleging how the other accused were involved, there is no specific charge against Sami. “Though the Gujarat police say my son was present in the meeting, they have not submitted any documents to substantiate their claim,” Mr. Bagewadi said.

Sami’s lawyer Mehmood Pracha, a Supreme Court advocate and an Additional Advocate-General of Haryana in the apex court said he believes there is no strong evidence against Sami.

“The Gujarat police have not produced any evidence against Sami. Also, Sami has been released in Karnataka. So, I am confident he will get bail in the Gujarat case too,” he said, adding that he will move a bail application soon.

‘Media, the worst enemy’

Mr. Bagewadi says the media became his worst enemy when his son was arrested in 2008.

“After the arrest, journalists filed false reports in newspapers and TV channels. I was out to purchase groceries, but the newspapers wrote I was absconding. The media reported that my elder son Mohammad Amjad, a software engineer, was sacked from his job, which was untrue. One even falsely reported that Sami’s laptop had details of plans to blast Almatti dam. More than the police, it was the media that tormented the family mentally,” he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 23,2020

New Delhi, Jul 23: Riding high on foreign investors buying stakes in Jio Platforms, Reliance Industries Ltd Chairman Mukesh Ambani became the world’s fifth-richest person Wednesday, edging past American investor Warren Buffett on the real-time ranking of billionaires by Forbes. With an estimated wealth of $75 billion, Ambani is only next to Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, whose wealth is pegged at $89 billion.

Buffet had slipped down the rankings after donating more than $37 billion of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. stock since 2006 to charity. Berkshire Hathaway’s stock performance has also underwhelmed recently.

Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos still sits at top in the richest list, with a net worth of $185.8 billion. He is followed by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates with net worth of $113.1 billion and luxury group LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton’s chief Bernard Arnault, with a net worth of $112 billion. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is at the fourth position in the Forbes list.

Shares of Ambani’s conglomerate have more than doubled since a low in March as its digital unit got more than $15 billion in investments from companies including Facebook Inc, Silver Lake, Intel, and most recently, Google. The US tech giant has committed a capital infusion of Rs 33,737 crore for a 7.7 per cent stake on Jio Platforms.

The total investment from financial and strategic investors into Jio Platforms stands at Rs 1,52,056 crore. RIL has raised a total of Rs 2,12,809 crore through a rights issue, the combined investments in Jio Platforms and investment by BP.

During the Reliance AGM last week, Ambani had said RIL has made its net-debt free ahead of a March 2021 target due to recent investments. Ambani said Jio has designed and developed a complete 5G solution that’s ready for launch as soon as spectrum is made available next year.

Jio and Google have also entered into a commercial agreement to jointly develop an entry-level affordable smartphone with optimisations to the Android operating system and the Play Store, Ambani said.

RILs market value jumped to Rs 12.7 lakh crore or $170 billion on Monday, making it the 51st most valued company in the world. Between April 1 and July 13, RIL has gained $81 billion in market capitalisation and has climbed 47 places from being the 98th most valued company on April 1 to 51st most value company now.

The share price of RIL has risen by 120 per cent over the last four months for Rs 883 per share on March 23, 2020 to Rs 1,939 on Monday. Since April 22, when Facebook Inc announced an investment of Rs 43,574 crore in Jio Platforms for 9.99 per cent equity stake, Jio Platforms has announced investments by 12 other investors. The total investment by these 13 investors over the last 12-weeks amounted to Rs 118,318 crore.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 30,2020

May 30: A Delhi court on Saturday granted interim bail for 10 days to former municipal councillor from the Congress Ishrat Jahan, who has been booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, to get married.

She has been booked under the anti-terror law in a case related to communal violence in northeast Delhi in February.

Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana granted the interim relief from June 10 to June 19 to Jahan on furnishing two sureties of Rs 1 lakh.

The court directed her not to tamper with any evidence or influence the witnesses in the case.

According to the interim bail plea, filed through advocates S K Sharma and Lalit Valeecha, Jahan's marriage was fixed in 2018 for June 12, 2020.

The plea further said that Jahan would not tamper with any evidence or influence the witnesses if granted bail.

The petition, also filed through advocates Tushar Anand and Manu Prabhakar, claimed that Jahan has been falsely implicated in the case.

It alleged that upon bare perusal of the contents of the FIR, no incident of violence can be attributed to her and the wild and baseless allegations made against her were not only irresponsible and false, but also caused serious harm to her reputation.

Jahan, who is also an advocate, was only a supporter of ongoing peaceful protests and it was one of the fundamental rights of the citizens to protest and register their dissent against any unreasonable measure of the government, the plea said.

Besides Jahan, Jamia Millia Islamia University students Asif Iqbal Tanha, Gulfisha Khatoon, Jamia Coordination Committee members Safoora Zargar, Meeran Haider, president of Jamia Alumni Association Shifa-Ur-Rehman, suspended AAP councillor Tahir Hussain, activist Khalid Safi, JNU student Natasha Narwal and former student leader Umar Khalid have also been booked under the anti-terror law in the case.

The police had claimed in the FIR that Khalid and his associates had instigated people to start riots in the area and it was a "premeditated conspiracy".

Communal clashes had broken out in northeast Delhi on February 24 after violence between citizenship law supporters and protesters spiralled out of control, leaving at least 53 people dead and around 200 injured.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 26,2020

Hyderabad, Feb 26: Hyderabad Police on Tuesday registered a case against well-known poet Imran Pratapgarhi for his statement asking why there was "no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad".

According to Charminar Police, the complaint was registered by Sub-Inspector S Guruswamy, who was on duty at the QQ Stadium on February 24 where an Ehtaji Mishaira (Poetry Program) against the Citizenship Amendment Act, National Register Commission and National Population Register was held.

Permission for the said event was granted by Hyderabad Additional Commissioner of Police to the program organisers with certain guidelines including that poetry program should be held on February 24 from 6 pm to 9 pm, and no speaker should give provocative speeches in the program.

However, police said that the program was started by the organisers at 6 pm and continued till 9:48 pm even after police officers asked them to end the event by 9 pm. The program was attended by around 3,000 members at QQ stadium.

According to police, while addressing the meeting Pratapgarhi said: "Mujhe hairath hai us Hyderabad mein koi Shaheen Bagh kyu nahi hai (I am surprised why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad)", which is "provocative" and may cause fear to any section of the public.

In this regard, a case has been registered against organisers for disobeying public servants' orders and the poet has been booked for delivering provocative statements under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Further investigation is underway.

Meanwhile, Congress leader Mohammed Ali Shabbir took to Twitter to condemn the police action.

"Hyderabad Police booked a case against poet Imran Pratapgarhi for expressing surprise on why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad. For police, this sentence is provocative. Is Shaheen Bagh not a part of India?," Shabbir tweeted.

"Shame on TRS Government and Hyderabad Police for targeting a poet for no-fault," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.