Verification delay a bottleneck for passports

September 15, 2013
PassportsNew Delhi, Sep 15: If you still have to wait for more than a month to get your passport despite the technology introduced by the Ministry of External Affairs, it is largely because of the slow pace at which local cops verify addresses and check records of passport applicants.

While police are expected to complete the verification of residential addresses and track records of each passport applicant within 21 days, they do so only in less than one-third of the cases. For the remaining two-thirds, they take months and, in some cases, even years.

“We think that if police authorities are able to give reports within 21 days, we can certainly meet the target of one month period in which we can deliver passports. Unfortunately, only 30 per cent of all police verification reports are received within 20 days nationally. We have to make constant efforts to improve that,” said country’s Chief Passport Officer Muktesh Pardeshi.

The MEA claims that it dispatches “normal” passports “within seven days” in 68 per cent cases and “within 15 days” in 90 per cent cases. The claim, however, comes with a disclaimer—the “seven days” and “the 15 days” do not include the time taken for police verification.

Though the MEA’s ambitious project to speed up the process of issuing passports with the help of Information Technology did help lessen the time taken in submission of application, processing, printing, signing and dispatching, the delay in police verification remains the biggest constraint.

“If we are able to improve police verification system drastically, the ministry is confident of reducing the total time taken in passport delivery to even a lower scale,” said Pardeshi.

The MEA has been working with state governments to establish online connectivity between the headquarters of police districts and the passport offices in order to speed up the process. But only 344 of the 722 police districts across the country could so far be linked with the passport offices.

A R Ghanashyam, the Additional Secretary heading the MEA’s Consular, Passport and Visa division, recently accompanied a parliamentary delegation to Bangalore to see how the Regional Passport Office in the city is working. He discussed with senior police officers and top brass of the Home Department of Karnataka government to find out the reasons of delay in police verification.

He was told that while approximately 5,00,000 passports were issued annually in Karnataka, the state had only a limited number of policemen to verify the addresses and check if the applicants had any past record of crimes. A policeman had to complete verification of eight to 10 passport applications every day, he said, quoting top police officers in Karnataka.

The MEA has also noted that a policeman could go for verification of the addresses of passport applicants only if he could spare sometime from his other duties, ranging from crime investigations to dealing with traffic violations and managing security of the VIPs.

The ministry contemplated depending on the digital databases of police in some states to check the track records of the passport seekers and thus lessen the burden on local cops. But it did not work as only some states have digitized criminal databases. An applicant may not have committed a crime in the state he resides in, but this is not enough to issue him a passport. He may have been involved with criminal activities in other states.

“This digital database (of any state) is of no use for us (for issue of passport). We need to have a national database and only then we will be able to depend on it,” said Ghanashyam.

/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

If you still have to wait for more than a month to get your passport despite the technology introduced by the Ministry of External Affairs, it is largely because of the slow pace at which local cops verify addresses and check records of passport applicants.

While police are expected to complete the verification of residential addresses and track records of each passport applicant within 21 days, they do so only in less than one-third of the cases. For the remaining two-thirds, they take months and, in some cases, even years.

“We think that if police authorities are able to give reports within 21 days, we can certainly meet the target of one month period in which we can deliver passports. Unfortunately, only 30 per cent of all police verification reports are received within 20 days nationally. We have to make constant efforts to improve that,” said country’s Chief Passport Officer Muktesh Pardeshi.

The MEA claims that it dispatches “normal” passports “within seven days” in 68 per cent cases and “within 15 days” in 90 per cent cases. The claim, however, comes with a disclaimer—the “seven days” and “the 15 days” do not include the time taken for police verification.

Though the MEA’s ambitious project to speed up the process of issuing passports with the help of Information Technology did help lessen the time taken in submission of application, processing, printing, signing and dispatching, the delay in police verification remains the biggest constraint.

“If we are able to improve police verification system drastically, the ministry is confident of reducing the total time taken in passport delivery to even a lower scale,” said Pardeshi.

The MEA has been working with state governments to establish online connectivity between the headquarters of police districts and the passport offices in order to speed up the process. But only 344 of the 722 police districts across the country could so far be linked with the passport offices.

A R Ghanashyam, the Additional Secretary heading the MEA’s Consular, Passport and Visa division, recently accompanied a parliamentary delegation to Bangalore to see how the Regional Passport Office in the city is working. He discussed with senior police officers and top brass of the Home Department of Karnataka government to find out the reasons of delay in police verification.

He was told that while approximately 5,00,000 passports were issued annually in Karnataka, the state had only a limited number of policemen to verify the addresses and check if the applicants had any past record of crimes. A policeman had to complete verification of eight to 10 passport applications every day, he said, quoting top police officers in Karnataka.

The MEA has also noted that a policeman could go for verification of the addresses of passport applicants only if he could spare sometime from his other duties, ranging from crime investigations to dealing with traffic violations and managing security of the VIPs.

The ministry contemplated depending on the digital databases of police in some states to check the track records of the passport seekers and thus lessen the burden on local cops. But it did not work as only some states have digitized criminal databases. An applicant may not have committed a crime in the state he resides in, but this is not enough to issue him a passport. He may have been involved with criminal activities in other states.

“This digital database (of any state) is of no use for us (for issue of passport). We need to have a national database and only then we will be able to depend on it,” said Ghanashyam.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 21,2020

Washington, Feb 21: Days ahead of his India visit, US President Donald Trump on Thursday said the two countries could make a "tremendous" trade deal.

"We're going to India, and we may make a tremendous deal there," Trump said in his commencement address at the Hope for Prisoners Graduation Ceremony in Las Vegas.

Trump, accompanied by First Lady Melania Trump, is scheduled to travel to Ahmedabad, Agra and New Delhi on February 24 and 25.

Ahead of the visit, there have been talks about India and the United States agreeing on a trade package as a precursor to a major trade deal.

During his commencement address, Trump indicated that the talks on this might slowdown if he did not get a good deal.

"Maybe we'll slow down. We'll do it after the election. I think that could happen too. So, we'll see what happens," he said.

"But we're only making deals if they're good deals because we're putting America first. Whether people like it or not, we're putting America first," Trump said.

Bilateral India-US trade in goods and services is about three per cent of the US' world trade.

In a recent report, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) said the trading relationship is more consequential for India -- in 2018 the United States was its second largest goods export market (16.0 per cent share) after the European Union (EU, 17.8 per cent), and third largest goods import supplier (6.3 per cent) after China (14.6 per cent) and the EU 28 (10.2 per cent).

"The Trump Administration takes issue with the US trade deficit with India, and has criticised India for a range of 'unfair' trading practices," the CRS said.

"Indian Prime Minister Modi's first term fell short of many observers' expectations, as India did not move forward with anticipated market opening reforms, and instead increased tariffs and trade restrictions," it said.

"Modi's strong electoral mandate may embolden the Indian government to press ahead with its reform agenda with greater vigour. Slowing economic growth in India raises concerns about its business environment," CRS said.

As per a fact sheet issued by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), trade in goods and services between the two countries from 1999 to 2018 surged from $16 billion to $142 billion.

India is now the United States' eighth-largest trading partner in goods and services and is among the world's largest economies.

India's trade with the United States now resembles, in terms of volume, the US' trade with South Korea ($167 billion in 2018) or France ($129 billion), said Alyssa Ayres from CFR.

"The United States for two years now has set out in stone pretty clearly the things that they wanted to see to try to get an agreement, and it's basically then on India's doorstep on whether they want to take those steps," Rick Rossow, Wadhwani Chair in US-India Policy Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank told reporters during a conference call.

"The list of US asks has been pretty static all throughout. Not to say that any of these things are easy for India to do, but the United States to my knowledge didn't change the goalposts just because we now consider India to be a middle-income country. The things that we wanted to see happen to get this trade agreement have been pretty static all throughout, no matter how difficult they are," he said in response to a question.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 7,2020

Mar 7: Two Malayalam news channels, Asianet News and Media One, which were banned by the information and broadcasting ministry for their coverage of the recent violence in Delhi on Friday evening, were allowed to resume telecasting on Saturday morning.

While Asianet News appeared to have begun operations around 7am on Saturday, Media One was screening content by 9.30am.

The ministry of information and broadcasting had imposed a 48-hour ban on Asianet News and Media One for their coverage of the Delhi violence for 48 hours from 7.30pm on Friday. Both Asianet News and Media One were barred under Rule 6(1 c) and Rule 6(1e) of the Cable Television Networks Act, 1994.

The ministry of information and broadcasting alleged Asianet News and Media One were "biased" and critical of the RSS and Delhi Police.

The ban on Asianet News and Media One triggered a torrent of criticism of the move. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor asked how "Malayalam channels inflame communal passions in Delhi?" and alleged some English news channels were continuing "their brazen distortions" with impunity.

In a statement issued on Friday after the ban, Media One termed the move "unfortunate and condemnable" and called it a "blatant attack against free and fair reporting". Media One called it "an order to stop free and fair journalism".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 30,2020

Kochi, Mar 30: Kerala High Court on Monday granted interim bail to the under-trial prisoners and remanded accused in the state till April 30 in view of the lockdown imposed to prevent the spread of coronavirus.

The court said that the accused should report to the local police station immediately after getting bail. Those released on bail must strictly follow the lockdown instructions, the High Court said.

"Those who have been convicted of imprisonment for less than seven years will get bail. Prison Superintendents will release the prisoners who are eligible. But regular offenders are not entitled to get bail," the court said.

After the bail period, the accused should appear in the respective trial courts, where a decision will be taken on their bail by the respective trial courts.

The Supreme Court had last week asked all state governments to release undertrial prisoners, who are facing charges attracting less than seven years imprisonment, to reduce overcrowding of jails amid the ongoing coronavirus scare.

So far, 194 confirmed cases of coronavirus have been reported in the state.

The country is under a 21-day lockdown to prevent the spread of coronavirus, which according to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has claimed the lives of 29 people and infected a total of 1071 people as on Monday morning.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.