Verification delay a bottleneck for passports

September 15, 2013
PassportsNew Delhi, Sep 15: If you still have to wait for more than a month to get your passport despite the technology introduced by the Ministry of External Affairs, it is largely because of the slow pace at which local cops verify addresses and check records of passport applicants.

While police are expected to complete the verification of residential addresses and track records of each passport applicant within 21 days, they do so only in less than one-third of the cases. For the remaining two-thirds, they take months and, in some cases, even years.

“We think that if police authorities are able to give reports within 21 days, we can certainly meet the target of one month period in which we can deliver passports. Unfortunately, only 30 per cent of all police verification reports are received within 20 days nationally. We have to make constant efforts to improve that,” said country’s Chief Passport Officer Muktesh Pardeshi.

The MEA claims that it dispatches “normal” passports “within seven days” in 68 per cent cases and “within 15 days” in 90 per cent cases. The claim, however, comes with a disclaimer—the “seven days” and “the 15 days” do not include the time taken for police verification.

Though the MEA’s ambitious project to speed up the process of issuing passports with the help of Information Technology did help lessen the time taken in submission of application, processing, printing, signing and dispatching, the delay in police verification remains the biggest constraint.

“If we are able to improve police verification system drastically, the ministry is confident of reducing the total time taken in passport delivery to even a lower scale,” said Pardeshi.

The MEA has been working with state governments to establish online connectivity between the headquarters of police districts and the passport offices in order to speed up the process. But only 344 of the 722 police districts across the country could so far be linked with the passport offices.

A R Ghanashyam, the Additional Secretary heading the MEA’s Consular, Passport and Visa division, recently accompanied a parliamentary delegation to Bangalore to see how the Regional Passport Office in the city is working. He discussed with senior police officers and top brass of the Home Department of Karnataka government to find out the reasons of delay in police verification.

He was told that while approximately 5,00,000 passports were issued annually in Karnataka, the state had only a limited number of policemen to verify the addresses and check if the applicants had any past record of crimes. A policeman had to complete verification of eight to 10 passport applications every day, he said, quoting top police officers in Karnataka.

The MEA has also noted that a policeman could go for verification of the addresses of passport applicants only if he could spare sometime from his other duties, ranging from crime investigations to dealing with traffic violations and managing security of the VIPs.

The ministry contemplated depending on the digital databases of police in some states to check the track records of the passport seekers and thus lessen the burden on local cops. But it did not work as only some states have digitized criminal databases. An applicant may not have committed a crime in the state he resides in, but this is not enough to issue him a passport. He may have been involved with criminal activities in other states.

“This digital database (of any state) is of no use for us (for issue of passport). We need to have a national database and only then we will be able to depend on it,” said Ghanashyam.

/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

If you still have to wait for more than a month to get your passport despite the technology introduced by the Ministry of External Affairs, it is largely because of the slow pace at which local cops verify addresses and check records of passport applicants.

While police are expected to complete the verification of residential addresses and track records of each passport applicant within 21 days, they do so only in less than one-third of the cases. For the remaining two-thirds, they take months and, in some cases, even years.

“We think that if police authorities are able to give reports within 21 days, we can certainly meet the target of one month period in which we can deliver passports. Unfortunately, only 30 per cent of all police verification reports are received within 20 days nationally. We have to make constant efforts to improve that,” said country’s Chief Passport Officer Muktesh Pardeshi.

The MEA claims that it dispatches “normal” passports “within seven days” in 68 per cent cases and “within 15 days” in 90 per cent cases. The claim, however, comes with a disclaimer—the “seven days” and “the 15 days” do not include the time taken for police verification.

Though the MEA’s ambitious project to speed up the process of issuing passports with the help of Information Technology did help lessen the time taken in submission of application, processing, printing, signing and dispatching, the delay in police verification remains the biggest constraint.

“If we are able to improve police verification system drastically, the ministry is confident of reducing the total time taken in passport delivery to even a lower scale,” said Pardeshi.

The MEA has been working with state governments to establish online connectivity between the headquarters of police districts and the passport offices in order to speed up the process. But only 344 of the 722 police districts across the country could so far be linked with the passport offices.

A R Ghanashyam, the Additional Secretary heading the MEA’s Consular, Passport and Visa division, recently accompanied a parliamentary delegation to Bangalore to see how the Regional Passport Office in the city is working. He discussed with senior police officers and top brass of the Home Department of Karnataka government to find out the reasons of delay in police verification.

He was told that while approximately 5,00,000 passports were issued annually in Karnataka, the state had only a limited number of policemen to verify the addresses and check if the applicants had any past record of crimes. A policeman had to complete verification of eight to 10 passport applications every day, he said, quoting top police officers in Karnataka.

The MEA has also noted that a policeman could go for verification of the addresses of passport applicants only if he could spare sometime from his other duties, ranging from crime investigations to dealing with traffic violations and managing security of the VIPs.

The ministry contemplated depending on the digital databases of police in some states to check the track records of the passport seekers and thus lessen the burden on local cops. But it did not work as only some states have digitized criminal databases. An applicant may not have committed a crime in the state he resides in, but this is not enough to issue him a passport. He may have been involved with criminal activities in other states.

“This digital database (of any state) is of no use for us (for issue of passport). We need to have a national database and only then we will be able to depend on it,” said Ghanashyam.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 29,2020

New Delhi, Jan 29: The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the plea by Mukesh Kumar Singh, one of the four death row convicts in the Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case, challenging the rejection of his mercy petition by the President.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice R Banumathi said that expeditious disposal of mercy plea by the President doesn't mean non-application of mind by him.

The court also said that alleged sufferings in prison can't be grounds to challenge the rejection of mercy petition.

The bench said all relevant material including judgments pronounced by trial court, high court and Supreme Court were placed before the President when he was considering the mercy plea of the convict.

The bench also comprising justices Ashok Bhushan and A S Bopanna rejected the contentions of the counsel appearing for Singh that entire materials of the case were not placed before the President when he was considering his mercy plea.

The bench, while referring to two files placed before it by the Centre on Tuesday, said that as per the January 15 covering letter which was sent by the Delhi government to the Ministry of Home Affairs, all relevant documents were sent.

The bench noted that detailed judgements of trial court, high court and the Supreme Court, curative petition filed by Singh, his past criminal history and his family background were sent to the Home Ministry by the Delhi government.

"All the documents were taken into consideration by the President while rejecting the mercy petition," the bench said.

The bench also dealt with submissions advanced by the convict's counsel, who had argued that the mercy plea was rejected at "lightning speed".

The bench said that if a mercy petition is expeditiously dealt with, it cannot be assumed that it has been adjudicated upon in a pre-conceived mind.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 24,2020

Apr 24: Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Friday sought Prime Minister Narendra Modi's intervention in bringing bodies of Keralites who died in the Gulf countries due to non-COVID-19 reasons to the state without any delay for performing last rites in their home towns.

In a letter, he wanted Modi to direct Indian embassies to issue necessary clearances without seeking individual approvals from the Ministry of Home Affairs and avoid any delay so that the remains reach Kerala early. It has been learnt that a 'clearance certificate' from the Indian embassies concerned was required to process the application for bringing home the bodies.

The embassies are insisting on production of no-objection certificate from the Union Ministry of Home Affairs, he said in the letter, a copy of which was released to the media here on Friday. The Centre had already agreed that in case the deaths are not COVID related, such certificates are not necessary.

The bodies are now being brought in the cargo planes as passenger flights are not being operated due to the lockdown. Chief Minister said he had received several grievances from the NRKs in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries on the delay in bringing home the bodies of those who died there. "They are already under tremendous stress and anxiety due to the lockdown imposed in those countries and the consequent stoppage of international flights", Vijayan said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 20,2020

May 20: Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli on Tuesday asserted that Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura belong to Nepal and vowed to "reclaim" them from India through political and diplomatic efforts, as his Cabinet endorsed a new political map showing the three areas as Nepalese territory.

Addressing Parliament, Oli said the territories belong to Nepal “but India has made it a disputed area by keeping its Army there”. “Nepalis were blocked from going there after India stationed its Army,” he said.

“India has deployed its troops in Kalapani since 1962 and our rulers in the past hesitated to raise the issue,” he said, asserting, “We will reclaim and get them back.”

The prime minister asserted that the Nepal government will make political and diplomatic efforts to reclaim the territory.

Oli also expressed the hope that India will “follow the path of truth, shown by Satya Meva Jayate, which is mentioned in the Ashoka Chakra, the national symbol of India”.

The prime minister’s remarks came a day after the Cabinet headed by him endorsed a new political map showing Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura under Nepal’s territory.

Foreign Minister Pradeep Kumar Gyawali said the official map of Nepal will soon be made public by the Ministry of Land Management. The move announced by Gyawali came weeks after he said that efforts were on to resolve the border issue with India through diplomatic initiatives.

Nepal''s ruling Nepal Communist Party lawmakers have also tabled a special resolution in Parliament demanding return of Kalapani, Limpiyadhura and Lipulekh to Nepal.

The Lipulekh pass is a far western point near Kalapani, a disputed border area between Nepal and India. Both India and Nepal claim Kalapani as an integral part of their territory - India as part of Uttarakhand’s Pithoragarh district and Nepal as part of Dharchula district.

Gyawali last week summoned the Indian Ambassador Vinay Mohan Kwatra and handed over a diplomatic note to him to protest against the construction of a key road connecting the Lipulekh pass with Dharchula in Uttarakhand.

India has said that the recently-inaugurated road section in Pithoragarh district in Uttarakhand lies completely within its territory. Indian Army chief Gen MM Naravane last week said that there were reasons to believe that Nepal objected to India''s newly-inaugurated road linking Lipulekh Pass with Dharchula in Uttarakhand at the behest of "someone else", in an apparent reference to a possible role by China on the matter.

He said there was no dispute whatsoever between India and Nepal in the area and road laid was very much within the Indian side.

The 80-KM-long strategically crucial road at a height of 17,000 KM along the border with China in Uttarakhand was thrown open by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh earlier this month.

Nepal has raised objection to the inauguration of the road, saying the "unilateral act" was against the understanding reached between the two countries on resolving the border issues. China on Tuesday said the Kalapani border issue is between India and Nepal as it hoped that the two neighbours could refrain from "unilateral actions" and properly resolve their disputes through friendly consultations.

After the endorsement of Nepal’s new map senior ruling party leader and member of Nepal Communist Party Standing Committee Ganesh Shah said the new move may escalate unnecessary tension between Nepal and India at a time when the country is fighting the coronavirus.

"The Nepal government should soon start a dialogue with India to resolve the matter through political and diplomatic moves," he said.

The new map includes 335-km land area including Limpiyadhura in the Nepalese territory.

The new map was drawn on the basis of the Sugauli Treaty of 1816 signed between Nepal and then the British India government and other relevant documents, which suggests Limpiyadhura, from where the Kali river originated, is Nepal''s border with India, The Kathmandu Post quoted an official at the Ministry of Land Reform and Management as saying.

India and Nepal are at a row after the Indian side issued a new political map incorporating Kalapani and Lipulekh on its side of the border in October last year.

The tension further escalated after India inaugurated the road link connecting Kailash Mansarovar, a holy pilgrimage site situated at Tibet, China, that passes through the territory belonging to Nepal.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.