Govt may go slow on Telangana to douse Seemandhra anger; no deadline for GoM report

October 9, 2013

GoM_reportNew Delhi, Oct 9: In a move to pacify protesters in the coastal region of the state, the Centre on Tuesday signalled that it would slow the process of splitting Andhra Pradesh, setting up a group of ministers for the bifurcation but not giving it a deadline to submit a report.

The Congress party has been caught off balance by the intensity of protests in Seemandhra, the part of Andhra left behind after the government conceded the long-pending demand for the creation of Telangana. Its own chief minister, Kiran Kumar Reddy, has opposed the breakup of the state but refused to quit, virtually daring the party to risk sacking him ahead of general elections next year.

The home ministry had originally proposed a six-week deadline for the GoM to submit its findings, but this did not find favour with a government desperate to show that while it wants to create Telangana, there is still scope to accommodate some demands of the dissenters.

The GoM, likely to be headed by home minister Sushilkumar Shinde, will divide the assets of Andhra and determine the boundaries of Telangana and Seemandhra with reference to electoral constituencies, and split judicial and statutory bodies, and other administrative units.

One reason the Congress wants to split Andhra is to minimise electoral losses in the state after popular leader Jaganmohan Reddy left the party in 2010. It reckons it will sweep a newly created Telangana, and pick up a few seats in a multi-cornered contest in Seemandhra. Telangana will have 17 Members of Parliament and Seemandhra, 25.

But things have gone from bad to worse over the past few days.

"It seems the Centre trusted the state's political leadership to explain the mechanics of the division to the people. But the AP chief minister is trying to sabotage the central decision," said Gautam Pingle, former Director, Center for Public Policy at Administrative Staff College of India.

One of the options before the government is to impose President's rule in the troubled state, though Shinde categorically denied any such move. With elections approaching, the Congress would not like to give the Opposition a stick to beat it with.

There is a precedent of forming a new state under President's rule:  Haryana in 1966. But given the bitter feud among pro and anti-Telangana parties, this time such a move will also be vulnerable to a legal challenge.

The Congress started the day by trying to discredit two of its bête noires in the state -- former chief minister Chandrababu Naidu and Jaganmohan Reddy -- by showing they had actually supported the split  before professing to oppose it.

Congress spokesperson Digvijaya Singh released letters written by Naidu in 2008 and 2012 and Reddy in 2012 expressing their support for Telangana. The two leaders are on indefinite fasts to protest the bifurcation of the state.

After the announcement of the GoM, Singh appealed to the people of Seemandhra to give up their protests "so that a healthy dialogue process can move forward and a solution that will benefit both the sides be arrived at".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 1,2020

Allahabad, Mar 1: Shabista Khan, wife of suspended pediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, fears that her husband's life is in danger.

In a letter written to the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court and senior government authorities, Shabista has sought security for her husband who is lodged in Mathura jail for allegedly delivering provocative speech during anti-CAA protest at Aligarh Muslim University.

"My husband is being mentally tortured in jail and is being subjected to inhuman behaviour," Shabista wrote in her letter to the chief justice of Allahabad High Court, additional chief secretary (home) and director general (jail), among others.

She said that she apprehended that an attempt could be made on her husband's life in jail and demanded adequate security for him.

She also demanded that her husband should be kept away from active criminals and lodged with common prisoners.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 4,2020

New Delhi, Feb 4: Saying the matter had been adjourned many times and it will have to hear it someday, the Supreme Court on Tuesday fixed April 14 for hearing a plea by Zakia Jafri, wife of slain MP Ehsan Jafri, challenging the SIT's clean chit to then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 riots.

A bench comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari posted the matter for hearing in April after Zakia's counsel sought an adjournment and urged the court to post it after the Holi vacation.

When advocate Aparna Bhat, appearing for Zakia, told the court that the issue in the matter is contentious, the bench said, "It has been adjourned so many times, whatever it is, we will have to hear it someday. Take one date and make sure you all are available." Zakia had filed a petition in the apex court in 2018 challenging the Gujarat High Court's October 5, 2017 order rejecting her plea against the decision of the Special Investigation Team.

Ehsan Jafri was among the 68 people killed at Gulberg Society on February 28, 2002, a day after the S-6 Coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt at Godhra killing 59 people and triggering riots in Gujarat.

On February 8, 2012, the SIT filed a closure report giving a clean chit to Modi and 63 others, including senior government officials, saying there was "no prosecutable evidence" against them.

Comments

Althaf
 - 
Tuesday, 4 Feb 2020

No use.. will Supreme court gives justice??? 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 4,2020

New Delhi, Jun 4: Press Council of India (PCI) member BR Gupta has resigned from his post, saying he was unable to work individually or collectively for the media, which is in a "deep crisis".

"I have tendered my resignation as a Press Council of India member," Gupta told PTI.

He said the PCI had the responsibility to encourage media and media professionals constantly.

"But everyone now realises that the media scenario is in a deep crisis. The motto for which the Council was created was not being fulfilled and I felt I was not doing anything remarkable for the freedom of media," Gupta said.

He claimed that the PCI was not a wholly representative body for the media.

"Then how can we come out of the crisis being faced by the media and mediapersons? It is a big challenge for us. I have quit as I have not been able to work individually or collectively being a PCI member," Gupta added.

Referring to salary cuts and job losses, he said media and mediapersons were struggling for social, political and economic justice.

When contacted, PCI chairman Justice C K Prasad said Gupta's resignation has not been accepted yet.

"I have received it (the resignation). I have not gone through it. It has not been accepted," Prasad told PTI.

Gupta was appointed as a PCI member for a three-year term on May 30, 2018.

He said liberty is one of the basic features of the preamble to the Constitution that continues to inspire people and the media.

"It is difficult (for me) to fulfil the unbiased role and responsibility to help citizens and the media for making democracy stronger," Gupta said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.