Indian archers seem poised for medals at Olympics

July 7, 2012
india_archers

Like in the 2004 Athens Games, Indian archers will be competing in all the medal events in the Olympics - the men's individual, women's individual, men's team and women's team - this time around in London. While the women's recurve team members Laishram Bombayla Devi, Deepika Kumari and Chekrovolu Swuro earned their berths by clinching a silver medal at the World Archery Championship in Turin (Italy) in July 2011, the men's team of Rahul Banerjee, Jayanta Talukdar and Tarundeep Rai booked the London tickets by finishing second best in the last qualifying event in Ogden, USA last month.

Going by recent form, most experts feel the London Games is the greatest chance for the Indian archers to win some medals for the country, the best being teenager Deepika Kumari in the women's individual category. However, the manner in which the men's team fought to qualify for the Games has made them the dark horses for the Games.

"I think they (men) have peaked at the right time and I am confident that both the men's and women's teams will win medals in London," Archery Association of India (AAI) general secretary Paresh Nath Mukherjee told TOI. His confidence stems from the fact that the archers have been consistently shooting in the 220 points range, which Mukherjee feels is good enough for an Olympic medal.

London will be the first Olympics for four out six archers, which means India will have a mix of experience and exuberance. The onus will be on Rai and Bombayla Devi, who have participated in the Olympics before, to channelize the youthful energy of Banerjee, Talukdar, Deepika and Chekrovolu since big stage nerves like can leave first-timers awe-struck.

"Olympics are always special. Every sportsperson grows up listening to Olympics stories. It's no doubt the greatest show on Earth. I have also heard a lot from my sister (Olympian Dola). She has cautioned me that one can get unnerved at such a huge event. Hence it is important to stay calm and focused," Banerjee told TOI.

As for Deepika, Olympics is a dream which she has nurtured ever since she picked up a bow and arrow. The Ranchi girl won her first World Cup individual recurve gold medal in Antalya, Turkey in May and became the world No. 1 in the FITA rankings last month. But her focus is on London. "The No. 1 ranking is okay but I will be happy only when we win a gold in the Olympics," he said.

Cricket's mecca - the legendary Lord's stadium - will be the venue for the archery event this time and the AAI held a month-long summer camp at the Paljor stadium in Gangtok to help the archers get a feel of the conditions in London. The Sikkim training helped the archers concentrate better.

The team will leave 10 days before the event begins to get acclimatized to the conditions in London. "Wind is likely to play an important role this time," Banerjee felt.

National coach Limba Ram, who himself missed out on an Olympic bronze medal by just one point in Barcelona in 1992, wants to experience that winning feeling through his wards. "We stand a good chance to win medals this time. Deepika is in good form and the men's team too has picked up at the right time," he said.

The common complaint against Indian archers has been that they fail to live up to their potential in international tournaments. London will provide the opportunity to put such talk to rest.

Key Players


Individual

Deepika Kumari: Very few thought the eldest daughter of autorickshaw driver Shivnarayan Mahato and nurse Geeta Mahato would one day be India's best bet for a Olympic medal in archery. Hailing from Ratu Chati village some 15 km from Ranchi, Jharkhand, Deepika came into limelight by winning the 11th Youth World Archery Championship in Ogden, USA in 2009 at an age of 15 years. She carried her superb form to senior level too, winning gold in Commonwealth Games and World Cup. The shy, introvert girl is the reigning world No. 1 archer. She has prevailed over the world's best archers from Korea, which makes her a medal favourite this time. "All the leading archers of the world take part in the World Cup. Hence success there has given me a lot of confidence," Deepika said adding, "I'm confident of not returning empty-handed from London this time."

Team: Women's

Laishram Bombayla Devi, Deepika Kumari and Chekrovolu Swuro are capable of surprising many this time. Most importantly, Deepika and Bombayla are among the very few archers in the world who have beaten the world's best Korean archers at some time. The trio has formed a good combination among themselves and back up each other well. Qualifying a year back, they have got good enough time to coordinate, strategize and train as a team keeping the Olympics in mind. Winning four matches will ensure a medal in the team event. Medal chances here are high.

India's best show so far

Individual: Limba Ram missing out on a bronze medal by one point in the 70m individual category in 1992 Barcelona Olympics.

Team event: Women's team of Dola Banerjee, Bombayala Devi and V Pranitha lost in the quarterfinals in 2008 Beijing Olympics.

Team: Men's

The Indian men's team of Jayanta Talukdar (from left), Rahul Banerjee and Tarundeep Rai qualified late last month at the Ogden, USA, meet, but the important aspect is that they have picked up at the right time. The team has done quite well this year, winning silver in the World Cup Stage II and Stage III events. The team has changed the shooting order this year with Jayanta and Rahul changing spots as the first and last shooters respectively, and that has worked quite well so far. The way Jayanta and Tarundeep backed Rahul when he lost his bow box before the final qualifying event speaks volumes about the team spirit.

Other Contenders

Bombayla Devi: This will be Bombayla's second Olympics after she became the first women to qualify for the 2008 Beijing Games. Being a regular member of the India side for the last four-five years, she has vast experience, which may come in handy in London.

Chekrovolu Swuro: The tall and stunning-looking archer from Dzulhami village of Phek district in Nagaland is a tough fighter and never loses heart in pressure situations. She has been in the circuit for more than a decade now and has enough exposure and experience to handle pressure in London.

Jayanta Talukdar: This quiet boy from Guwahati is one of the most consistent performer among Indian archers. Talukdar was the first Indian archer to win a gold medal at the World Cup in 2006. He is currently the highest ranked Indian archer (World No. 15).

Tarundeep Rai: This will the second Olympics for this archer from Sikkim, who as a 20-year-old participated in the Athens Olympics in 2004. He suffered a career-threatening shoulder injury which put him out of action for about two years but he made a strong comeback to the Indian side through sheer hard work.

Rahul Banerjee: The younger brother of Olympian Dola Banerjee, Rahul has watched from close quarters how her sister prepared intensely for the Olympics. Hence in spite of this being his first Olympics, he should not be left wanting in London. He showed great character by qualifying for the team event in spite of losing his bow box before the last qualifying event.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 2,2020

Mar 2: Indian captain Virat Kohli was left frustrated and deflated as New Zealand won the second Test inside three days in Christchurch on Monday to sweep the series.

India started the day at 90 for six and were all out for 124, before New Zealand chased down the required 132 to win for the loss of three wickets in 36 overs.

It ended a disappointing tour for India and Kohli as New Zealand, who won the first Test by 10 wickets early on day four, wrapped up the series with ease.

New Zealand are now unbeaten in their last 13 home Tests, winning nine of them, and in the past decade their record as hosts is played 39, won 20, drawn 13 and lost five.

In the latest series, on traditional New Zealand green wickets, India managed scores of 165, 191, 242 and 124, reflecting the low contributions from Kohli of 2, 19, 3 and 14.

Kohli came to New Zealand as the world's top Test batsman and oozing charm as he described New Zealand as the “nice guys” of cricket.

But during the series he lost his top ranking to Australian Steve Smith and when Kane Williamson went for three in the first innings of the second Test the pressure showed when he gave the New Zealand skipper a very animated send-off.

There was further evidence of frustration when he was caught on camera yelling an obscenity at a group of New Zealand supporters on Sunday.

The end came quickly for India on day three as Tim Southee and Trent Boult tormented the batsmen with their variety of inswing and outswing deliveries targeting both sides of the stumps.

Hanuma Vihari was the first to fall, in Southee's second over, when he turned a legside delivery too fine and was caught by BJ Watling diving to his left.

Five balls later and with no addition to the score, India's other overnight batsman Rishabh Pant was caught behind off a Boult delivery that swung away.

Mohammed Shami was caught for five by Tom Blundell at deep mid-wicket and Jasprit Bumrah was run out when trying to give the strike to Ravindra Jadeja, who was unbeaten on 16.

Boult and Southee signed for most of the dismissals with Boult taking four for 28 and Southee three for 36. The swing pair accounted for 25 of the 40 Indian wickets in the series.

There was enough seam and swing available for India to keep the New Zealand batsmen guessing but Bumrah and Umesh Yadav were unable to apply consistent pressure and Mohammed Shami was troubled by a sore shoulder.

New Zealand coasted through a century opening stand by Tom Latham and Blundell before losing three quick wickets.

Latham notched his 18th half-century and second of the Test before he was caught behind off Yadav for 52, Kane Williamson had a short stay for five, and Blundell went for 55.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 7,2020

Mumbai, Jul 7: Australias second largest city Melbourne is set to go for another round of lockdown — for six weeks — from midnight Wednesday as the coronavirus has reared its ugly head in Victoria. And this has further confirmed that this years T20 World Cup in Australia is practically not possible. Even as the ICC keeps delaying the announcement, BCCI hopes that the official call will now be taken with this latest development.

Despite ICC's Financial and Commercial Affairs Committee (F&CA) chief Ehsan Mani as well as Cricket Australia making it clear time and again that hosting a T20 World Cup in the October-November window is practically impossible, the ICC hasn't made an official announcement and that hasn't impressed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

Speaking to media persons, a BCCI official said that it is only the ICC which has kept speaking about delaying the inevitable — announcing a postponement — even as Cricket Australia chairman Earl Eddings wrote to the international body that it looks highly unlikely that a T20 World Cup can be hosted in these trying times.

"As it is there were so many logistical difficulties and that is perfectly understandable. The Australian government has been addressing the public health issue efficiently and there are regulations in place which are crucial to address the challenges. In that background even Cricket Australia has been practical in their assessment of the situation.

"With this present situation where Melbourne is in lockdown, the ICC really must take the final call of closure on the issue if they have any concept of responsible decision making," the official said.

Not just CA chairman Eddings, but also Mani — who is also the PCB chief — recently told the media that the T20 World Cup cannot be held in a bio-secure environment.

"We have had a lot of discussions and the feeling is it (T20 World Cup) would not be possible this year. ICC has World Cups lined up in 2021 and 2023, so we have a gap year where we can adjust this event. God forbid if some player(s) falls ill or mishap occurs during the tournament, it will have a big impact and create panic in the cricket world and we can't take that risk. Having a bio-bubble environment is feasible for say a bilateral series like Pakistan in England, but it is very difficult when 16 teams are involved," he had said.

Cricket Australia's interim CEO Nick Hockley echoed the sentiments when he said the biggest challenge was to get the players from so many teams into the country.

"Our biggest challenge is getting 15 teams into the country. If I compare it with the prospect of a bilateral tour, you're talking about bringing one team in and then playing individual matches. But the prospect of bringing 15 teams in and having six or seven teams in one city at the same time, it's a much more complex exercise," he had said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 12,2020

New Delhi, May 12: Chennai Super Kings have rejected the idea of an IPL with only Indian players in the near future, differing with Rajasthan Royals, the franchise which is keen on the option given the circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The IPL, which is indefinitely postponed, can be held in the September-October window if the scheduled T20 World Cup in Australia doesn't take place.

"CSK is not keen to do an IPL with only Indian players. That way it would be playing another Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy (domestic T20 competition). The franchise has not been in touch with the BCCI of late as the situation is worsening," a CSK source said on conditions of anonymity.

"Let's hope we can have the IPL later this year," he added.

CSK are three-time IPL champions, making them the second most successful team in the event's history after Mumbai Indians, who have won the tournament four times.

The BCCI is also very keen to stage the IPL and if it doesn't happen, the world's richest board would be in financial trouble like Cricket Australia.

"The board will take a revenue hit of Rs 4000 crore if it doesn't happen. The board will be in a big problem," BCCI treasurer Arun Dhumal said earlier this week.

With COVID-19 cases continuing to rise in India, the board and IPL team officials see little point in discussing when the event can be held.

"There has been no discussion with the BCCI ever since it postponed the IPL. There is no point in discussing also as things are unlikely to be okay anytime soon," the CSK source said.

"We expect the BCCI to take the best possible decision when the time comes," he added.

For the IPL to happen with foreign players, travel restrictions, which are currently in place, will have to be eased.

There is an option of conducting the IPL outside India and Sri Lanka Cricket has even offered to host the biggest T20 league in the world.

M S Dhoni was expected to make a much-awaited comeback with the IPL but that too has been postponed indefinitely.

Teammates like Suresh Raina and Piyush Chawla have already spoken about how eager Dhoni was to return.

According to them, Dhoni had the determination of a youngster before the league was suspended due to the lockdown imposed to contain the pandemic.

"Dhoni is his own man but I see him playing the IPL for at least two three years. When it comes to playing for India, only he knows best," the source added.

Last month, Rajasthan Royals executive chairman Ranjit Barthakur had said the franchise was open to a shortened IPL with only Indian players.

"Earlier we could not think of an Indians-only IPL but now there is enough quality to choose from. It is better to have an Indians-only IPL than not have it at all," he had told news agency.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.