What plans do the national selectors have for Sachin Tendulkar?

September 3, 2012
sachin_loosing_performence

It is time to question the perspective that seems to have dictated the decision of the national selectors thus far in handling Team India’s transitional phase. Is it enough to take the horse to the water? Or do you want to teach it to drink? Thus far, the selectors seem to have preferred the second option.

Vulnerable as India’s young cubs are supposed to hostile opponents, and windy or bouncy conditions, the selectors have sought to protect them with the nurturing hand of experience. After all, goes the argument, the three stalwarts Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman and Sachin Tendulkar - of whom only the last is still active in Test cricket - have amazing track records and broke new ground in India’s overseas campaigns So who better than them to teach the youngsters how it is done?

The results since the summer of 2011: unprecedented whitewashes in England and Australia and a shaky, not-out-of-the-woods-yet performance against New Zealand. In the meantime, Dravid and Laxman made up their minds and decided to leave the stage for good. We hear that Tendulkar has no such plans for the moment.

The question is: What plans do the selectors have for Tendulkar? Or, would they prefer to abdicate the responsibility of planning Tendulkar’s future, leaving him to eventually face the wrath of the public when even they grow weary of his fading form? After all, abdicating the responsibility of decision making is something the Government of India has specialised in. Given that said Government is enjoying its second term in power, perhaps the selectors find therein a great example to follow.

That brings us to the bone of contention in the Tendulkar debate. Since the summer of 2011 (that is, after his wonderful trip to South Africa), Tendulkar averages 35 in 23 innings. Some would argue that strongly suggests a lean patch while others would not be so sure. But I believe both sides can agree an average of 35 is not exactly glorious. Further, we’ve got to believe that our young cubs can score at least 30-odd on average in Test cricket!

And it is this aspect of the experience vs youth debate that bothers me. If we don’t believe India’s younger generation of batsmen can produce even such an unflattering level of performance, maybe we should all just stop watching the Indian team because it’s a hopeless prospect.

The argument propounded in favour of experience is that left to fend for themselves, the youngsters would fail spectacularly and India would sink to disastrous defeats. But (a) there’s not much lower to sink than the low 30s for a middle-order batsman and (b) it doesn’t get more disastrous than 0-8.

At Adelaide and at Bangalore, with the rest of the batting collapsing around him, it was Virat Kohli, so reviled for his ‘attitude’, who stepped up and held the innings together It may take him years to get anywhere close to the phenomenal records of Tendulkar or Dravid, but the formbook is firmly in his favour. The likes of Ajinkya Rahane are waiting in the wings in the meantime. Would giving them the chance to score even a few low 20s such a big risk when the returns from experience aren’t that much more lustrous?

I will not comment on the reasons for Tendulkar’s string of low scores because that is not my subject. But I am keenly interested to know what exactly are the selectors waiting for - Godot? One hopes the selectors are not in the game of gaining popularity votes from the audience and the media. It is their responsibility to make decisions that further the progress of the Indian cricket team in the respective formats.

While one as legendary as Tendulkar has earned the right to sign off on his terms, there comes a time when the selectors decide they have waited long enough and take a decision on his behalf. They are fully entitled to do so, if they believe that is the case, as is Tendulkar to keep playing as long as he is deemed eligible by the selectors.

Let us hope the new selection committee shows some spine and doesn’t let down Team India as badly as the affable Kris Srikkanth committee did.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 19,2020

Geneva, Mar 19: Regional Olympic officials are rallying around the IOC and have backed its stance on opening the Tokyo Games as scheduled, as direct criticism from gold medalist athletes built amid the coronavirus outbreak.

Leaders of continental Olympic groups praised the IOC after a conference call Wednesday to update them on coronavirus issues four months before the opening ceremony in Tokyo on July 24.

"We are living through an unpredictable crisis and as such, it is important that we have one policy, expressed by the IOC, and we follow that policy in unison," the Italy-based European Olympic Committees said.

However, when the International Olympic Committee published an interview with its president, Thomas Bach, after a separate call with athlete representatives, it prompted a four-time Olympic champion to urge postponing the games.

Bach acknowledged that many athletes were concerned about qualifying events being canceled, but noted that there were still four months to go until the games are set to be opened.

"We will keep acting in a responsible way in the interests of the athletes," Bach said.

British rowing great Matthew Pinsent wrote on Twitter that the comments from Bach, his former IOC colleague, were "tone deaf."

"The instinct to keep safe (not to mention obey govt instructions to lock down) is not compatible with athlete training, travel and focus that a looming Olympics demands of athletes, spectators organisers," Pinsent wrote.

Responding to the criticism from Hayley Wickenheiser, a four-time Olympic hockey gold medalist, the IOC said it was "counting on the responsibility and solidarity of the athletes."

Members reinforce faith in IOC

The IOC repeated its steadfast stance after a conference call with sports governing bodies, many of which have not completed qualification events for Tokyo.

"There is no need for any drastic decisions at this stage; and any speculation at this moment would be counter-productive," the IOC said.

That message was repeated after Wednesday's conference call by IOC executive board member Robin Mitchell, the interim leader of the group of national Olympic bodies known as ANOC.

"We share the view that we must be realistic, but not panic," Mitchell said in a statement released by the IOC on behalf of the Oceania Olympic group.

Offering unanimous support for the IOC's efforts to resolve qualification issues, the 41-nation Pan-American group noted challenges facing potential Olympians.

Australian Olympic Committee chief executive Matt Carroll said his organized recognized there was a global health crisis, but equally was assured by the IOC that the games would go ahead.

"We recognize people are suffering -- people are sick, people are losing jobs, businesses are struggling amid enormous community uncertainty. Things are changing everyday and we all must adapt," Carroll said.

"We owe it to our Australian athletes to do everything we can to ensure they will participate with the best opportunity in those Games."

Australia's team delegation leader said the focus now was "moving to the planning of our pre-Games preparation to ensure we get our athletes to the Games healthy, prepared and virus free."

"Clearly that is a major challenge for all National Olympic Committees," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 14,2020

Melbourne, Apr 14: As all sporting action across the world has come to a halt due to the coronavirus pandemic, Australian bowlers are pondering as to how Indian skipper Virat Kohli might play in front of no spectators.

India and Australia are scheduled to play a four-match Test series later this year, and it is being speculated that the series might end up taking place without any crowds due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Australian spinner Nathan Lyon on Tuesday said that it would be interesting to see how Kohli goes about it if he does not get a chance to get the audience behind him.

"He is probably good enough to adapt to any scenario. But I was talking to Mitch Starc the other day and we actually said that if we are playing with no crowd, it'll be quite amazing to see Virat trying to rev up the empty seats," cricket.com.au quoted Lyon as saying.

"It is going to be a little bit different, but Virat is a superstar. He will be able to adapt to any climate that we are able to play in," he added.
During the 2018-19 series, India managed to defeat Australia in Australia for the first time in a Test series.

Australia, at that time were without the services of David Warner and Steve Smith. However, the series later this year promises to be a mouth-watering prospect.

"I am excited about the prospect of India coming out to Australia, it's up there with the biggest series alongside the Ashes. They are an absolute powerhouse of the cricket world, and to have those guys out here is going to be fantastic. Playing in front of crowds or no crowds is out of our control, we have got to follow the advice of all the amazing medical people around the world," Lyon said.

"I have not thought about no crowds or massive crowds, it is just about the opportunity of playing against India again. They had the wood over us last time they came over here but we are a much stronger Australian cricket side at the moment, and I am just unbelievably excited about playing them here at home," he added.

Lyon was slated to represent Hampshire in County Championship this year, however, his stint was called off last week due to COVID-19.
He is Australia's third-highest wicket-taker in the longest format of the game as he has total of 390 wickets in Test cricket.

Lyon was last seen in action in the Big Bash League for Sydney Sixers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 21,2020

Melbourne, Jul 21: Cricket Australia's chief executive Nick Hockley has said that the Indian players and staff will most likely be asked to face two weeks of quarantine before the four-match Test series.

This scenario will bring the Adelaide Oval and its newly constructed hotel firmly into view as the sort of biosecure bubble, ESPNCricinfo reported.

India and Australia are slated to face each other in a four-match Test series, which is to begin from December 4 at Brisbane.

"The two-week quarantine is pretty well-defined. What we are working on is making sure that even within that quarantine environment, the players have got the absolute best training facilities, so that their preparation for the matches is as optimal as it can possibly be," ESPNCricinfo quoted Hockey as saying.

"Certainly the fact that the Adelaide Oval has a hotel. It does provide a facility not dissimilar to Old Trafford or Ageas Bowl where the hotels are integrated into the venue," he added.

Hockley also said that an exacting standard of biosecurity and testing would be applied before the series against India as the coronavirus cases are spiking in the subcontinent.

"It's widely known and it's unlikely that international travel restrictions would have lifted by the time that India will be due to come into the country. Clearly there will be testing regimes. We will be able to test people before that they get on to the plane and it is the nature of the situation of making sure we have the quarantine arrangements in line with government and health authority protocols," Hockley said.

"The key thing for the players is that there's regular testing and that we appropriately quarantine them when they come in and all of those plans are currently in development," he added.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) on Monday announced the postponement of the T20 World Cup 2020 slated to be held in Australia from October 18-November 15 due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Following the announcement, the BCCI is likely to go ahead with the Indian Premier League (IPL) in the October-November window. However, it is known where the T20 tournament will be played as cases continue to rise in India.
"I think the BCCI has made no secrets that they are considering what that means for the IPL. For us, it's about getting a bit of an understanding and certainty around what that means. Clearly, in a normal course, some of our best players are obviously top picks for those IPL teams," Hockley said.

"It's a bit premature to speculate on that. We need to understand what the plans are if any and once we understand that we will make decisions accordingly," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.