India's exit opens old wounds

October 4, 2012

iddia_cricket

Role of a few seniors comes under scanner after the painful stumble in Colombo. Never in the last three years have India made an exit from World T20 with such a heavy heart.

Disappointing as the last two editions were having failed to win even a single tie in six Super Eight outings in England and the West Indies, their latest elimination was a touch cruel on them. It must have been hard for India to digest the fact that despite winning two matches -- just as the two semifinalists from Group 2, Australia and Pakistan – they had to abort their campaign.

Without completely acquitting MS Dhoni and company of their failure to progress beyond the Super Eights for the third consecutive time, it must be mentioned that they were at the receiving end those ‘uncontrollable’ elements in the game. They may have been castigated for their heavy defeat against Australia, the primary reason behind their early departure, but the fact remains that India’s bowlers, particularly the spinners, were severely handicapped after a brief shower just at the start of the Australian chase left the ball wet and nicely settled the pitch in favour of batsmen.

The hiding Australia gave was so forceful that India were always playing the catch-up game in the rest of their matches. As if that defeat wasn’t bad enough, Australia unexpectedly crashed to their first defeat of the tournament and how! Their 32-run loss to Pakistan on Tuesday left India with prayers on their lips, going into their final match against South Africa that didn’t pan out as they expected.

“I think the same question was asked in Australia. It is one question that always arises if you haven’t done well,” said Dhoni when asked if the team needed an overhaul. “You just see the performances in this tournament so far, where we lost? We lost just one game badly and all of you have been covering cricket for a long time and we all know what impact rain has on bowlers, especially spinners. Our (fast) bowlers don’t bowl at 140 plus. So let us get practical about what the reason was and see was it the real fault of the players? It is not...it can happen in this format.?You don’t want to be in a situation where other games involving other teams can affect you. But sometimes you are forced to accept what is pushed on you,” explained Dhoni gathering his wits.

While Dhoni’s argument isn’t without any merit, some impassive post-mortem ought to be done to find out India’s continued failures in the shortest format. Let’s look at the advantages they enjoyed in the tournament. Apart from Australia, they were the only side to have played all their matches at the R Premadasa but India were the only team whose every encounter was in the night and not in the oppressively humid afternoons.

Not even the home team was extended this luxury for obvious reasons. So, one would expect India to have acclimatised to the conditions better than anyone else. That they couldn’t get their act together proved that, at the end of the day, cricket is a battle between bat and ball as much as it’s about battling conditions.

While the bowlers’ inability to keep Aussie batsmen in check may eventually have cost India a semifinal berth, it was, in fact, the Indian attack, never their strong forte, that kept them afloat in the tournament. In five matches, they bowled out their opposition on four occasions, an incredible feat in the T20 format. It was the batsmen who were the bigger culprits. Their openers remained iffy throughout the tournament while it was obvious that there was too much reliance on Virat Kohli. Whenever the 23-year-old failed, the middle-order was left with too much to do. Barring the game against England, when they rattled 170/4, Indian batsmen could never impose themselves on the opposition.

India’s next T20 isn’t until December when Pakistan are scheduled to tour for three one-dayers and two T20s, and it’s time for some harsh calls. Especially so regarding the role of some seniors in the side.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
May 31,2020

London, May 31: "Jacques Kallis, Sachin Tendulkar, Virat Kohli," replied umpire Ian Gould when he was asked to name the three best batsmen he loved watching when he was officiating as an umpire.

The former ICC elite umpire said that he was unlucky to not watch Ponting bat as much as he would have liked to.

"Jacques Kallis. I loved watching Jacques. He was a very, very fine player. Sachin. And probably Virat. I was unlucky in some respects. I didn't see the best of Ricky Ponting. He was an outstanding character, outstanding captain, such a proud Australian," ESPNCricinfo quoted Gould as saying.

"But his career was just starting to wane as I came on the scene. But he was incredibly helpful, so I'm disappointed I have to leave him out. Jacques Kallis, I could sit and watch all day, Virat, the same. And Sachin, if you want someone to bat for your life, he was the man," he added.

Gould had retired from the ICC's panel of elite umpires in 2019, after standing in more than 250 international matches over a 13-year career.

Over the years, comparisons between Kohli and Sachin Tendulkar have been growing and many have picked the current Indian skipper to break the records set by Tendulkar.

Tendulkar called time on his career after registering 100 international centuries, while Kohli has 70 centuries across all formats.

While, Kallis played 166 Tests, 328 ODIs and 25 T20Is for South Africa and he is often viewed as the greatest all-rounder the game has seen.

Many pundits of the game find it hard to pick between him and Sir Garfield Sobers.

Across his career, Kallis scored 25,534 runs in his career and he also managed to take 577 wickets.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 30,2020

New Delhi Jul 30: After Pakistan cricketer Umar Akmal's ban was reduced to 18 months, Danish Kaneria criticised Pakistan Cricket Board's (PCB) policies and said that the 'zero tolerance policy' applies only to him.

"Zero Tolerance policy only apply on Danish Kaneria not on others, can anybody answer the reason why I get life ban not others, Are policy applies only on cast, colour, and powerful background. I am Hindu and proud of it that's my background and my dharma," Kaneria tweeted.

Earlier on Wednesday, Akmal's three-year suspension was reduced to 18 months by an independent adjudicator, former Pakistan Supreme Court judge, Faqir Mohammad Khokhar.

On April 27, the Chairman of the Disciplinary Panel, Justice (retd) Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, had banned the wicketkeeper-batsman for three years after finding him guilty of breaching the PCB's Anti-Corruption Code in two separate incidents.

Akmal, on May 19, filed an appeal against the three-year ban imposed on him, seeking a reduction in the duration of the sanction. He will remain suspended effectively from February 2020 till August 2021.

The batsman said he might appeal again to get the ban "reduced further".

"I am thankful to the judge for listening to my lawyers properly. I will decide about the remaining sentence and try to get it reduced further. For now I am not satisfied and will consult my lawyers and family how to take this ahead," ESPNcricinfo had quoted Akmal as saying.

"There are many players before me who made mistakes and just look at what they got and what I got. So all I say right now is thank you very much," he had added.

On the other hand, Kaneria was found guilty of spot-fixing while playing for English club Essex and was banned from the sport.

Earlier this month, Pakistan's cricket governing body 'advised' Kaneria to approach England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) if he wants to play domestic cricket after the cricketer had appealed to the PCB, seeking permission to play domestic cricket. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 13,2020

Mumbai, Jun 13: Vasant Raiji, who was India's oldest first-class cricketer at 100, died in Mumbai in the wee hours of Saturday.

Raiji was 100 years old and is survived by his wife and two daughters.

"He (Raiji) passed away at 2.20 am in his sleep at his residence in Walkeshwar in South Mumbai due to old-age," his son-in-law Sudarshan Nanavati told PTI.

Raiji, a right-handed batsman, played nine first-class matches in the 1940s, scoring 277 runs with 68 being his highest score.

He made his debut for a Cricket Club of India team that played Central Provinces and Berar in Nagpur in 1939.

His Mumbai debut happened in 1941 when the team played Western India under the leadership of Vijay Merchant.

Raiji, also a cricket historian and chartered accountant, was 13 when India played its first Test match at the Bombay Gymkhana in South Mumbai.

Cricket icon Sachin Tendulkar and former Australian skipper Steve Waugh had paid a courtesy visit to Raiji at his residence in January when he had turned 100.

It has been learnt that the cremation will take place at the Chandanwadi crematorium in South Mumbai on Saturday afternoon.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.