Pujara double pegs back England

November 17, 2012

IN16_PUJARA

Right-hander hammers classy, unbeaten 206 as India pile up 521/8; visitors struggling at 41/3

conviction that India have found a replacement for Rahul Dravid in Cheteshwar Pujara at number three position.

After all, the Bangalorean belongs to the pantheon of legends and performed consistently for nearly two decades.

In contrast, Pujara is on the budding stages of a Test career that promises a long stint at the top-level and on Friday he offered another hint, scoring a double hundred (206 n.o., 389b, 21x4) against England on the second day of the first Test, leading India to a massive 521 for eight declared.

England were in all sorts of trouble at 41 for three at stumps with spinners R Ashwin, who grabbed his 50th Test wicket in only his ninth Test, and Pragyan Ojha all over them like a bad rash. England are still behind by 480 runs, and they need 281 more to avoid the follow-on.


Cut to Pujara’s effort. The sheer volume of runs that he scored on the day can easily deviate attention from the underlying significance of his knock. Indeed, it requires tremendous amount of stamina and concentration to conjure such an innings, but the knock revealed much more than his endurance.

Resuming from his overnight 98, Pujara took his time to reach the three-figure mark. After playing out a maiden against Graeme Swann, who later went on to claim a five-wicket haul, the Saurashtra man went past the coveted mark, second time in four innings, with a single off James Anderson.

The feat wasn’t celebrated animatedly or by mouthing swear words — a simple wave of the bat and a smile marked the milestone. Subsequent events underscored his desire to carry on and convert the knock into something more substantial, much like his predecessor at number three.

Pujara has always had that burning ambition to score big runs. If you crane your neck back to have a detailed look at his career, you can see some sky scrappers like a triple hundred against Orissa in the Ranji Trophy, two triple tons for Saurashtra in an under-22 tournament, and double hundreds against Maharashtra and the West Indies ‘A’.


However, the England attack is an entirely different beast. Bowlers such as Anderson, Stuart Broad, Swann and Tim Bresnan are tough competitors, demanding higher levels of skills and concentration to score off them.

Pujara proved emphatically that he has both the elements in abundance, and he never let the satisfaction of scoring a hundred hinder his focus. Reaching the landmark seemed to have only liberated him, and his comfort level was quite evident as he stepped out of the crease a few times to Swann, nullifying the turn, however little in amount it was.

Make no mistake; it wasn’t a selfish knock concentrating only on his individual runs. Pujara never left his partners starving for strike. In the company of Yuvraj Singh, who was equally impressive while making 74, Pujara realised 130 runs for the fifth wicket.

The partnership thwarted England’s ambitions for an early breakthrough in the first session. Sensing the touch of Yuvraj, Pujara allowed the Punjab left-hander to dictate terms. As the pair began to impose their game, England bowlers became impatient and their desperation came out in the shape of excessive appealing, and some of them were plain ridiculous.

The burgeoning alliance was snapped when left-arm spinner Samit Patel’s good fortune assisted him to get the wicket of Yuvraj, who lofted a full toss straight into the hands of Swann at long-on. But Pujara was as solid as a rock, and reached his double hundred with a single off Anderson.

This time he allowed himself the liberty of a more vigorous celebration, an extravagant swish of the bat conveying his joy to the adoring home fans. In the process, Pujara also became the sixth Indian batsman to score a double hundred against England, the others being Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi, Sunil Gavaskar, Gundappa Viswa¬nath, Vinod Kambli and Dravid. Not an ordinary company for sure!

Even with such a huge personal landmark beckoning, Pujara never let his focus waver from building partnerships, the latest on the list was a 66-run alliance with R Ashwin for the seventh wicket that propelled India past the 500-mark. It was just the beginning of the Pujara story then, one would reckon.


Score board

India (I Innings, O/n: 323/4):

Gambhir b Swann 45

(127m, 111b, 4x4)

Sehwag b Swann 117

(209m, 117b, 15x4, 1x6)

Pujara (not out) 206

(513m, 389b, 21x4)

Tendulkar c Patel b Swann 13

(25m, 18b, 2x4)

Kohli b Swann 19

(70m, 67b, 3x4)

Yuvraj c Swann b Patel 74

(183m, 151b, 6x4, 2x6)

Dhoni b Swann 5

(39m, 37b)

Ashwin c Prior b Pietersen 23

(81m, 52b, 2x4)

Zaheer c Trott b Anderson 7

(11m, 10b, 1x4)

Ojha (not out) 0

(14m, 9b)

Extras (B-1, LB-10, NB-1) 12

Total (8 wkts decl, 160 overs) 521

Fall of wickets: 1-134 (Gambhir), 2-224 (Sehwag), 3-250 (Tendulkar), 4-283 (Kohli), 5-413 (Yuvraj), 6-444 (Dhoni), 7-510 (Ashwin), 8-519 (Zaheer).

Bowling: Anderson 27-7-75-1, Broad 24-1-97-0 (nb-1), Bresnan 19-2-73-0, Swann 51-8-144-5, Samit Patel 31-3-96-1, Pietersen 8-1-25-1.

ENGLAND (I Innings):

Cook (batting) 22

(72m, 39b, 4x4)

Compton b Ashwin 9

(50m, 53b)

Anderson c Gambhir b Ojha 2

(6m, 6b)

Trott c Pujara b Ashwin 0

(4m, 4b)

Pietersen (batting) 6

(9m, 6b, 1x4)

Extras (LB-2) 2

Total (for 3 wkts, 18 overs) 41

Fall of wickets: 1-26 (Compton), 2-29 (Anderson), 3-30 (Trott). Bowling: Ashwin 8-1-21-2, Zaheer 5-3-6-0, Ojha 4-1-3-1, Yuvraj 1-0-9-0.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 6,2020

New Delhi, Jun 6: Former West Indies pacer Michael Holding has come out in support of MS Dhoni, saying that the wicket-keeper batsman indeed wanted to win the match against England in the 2019 World Cup.

India's performance in the World Cup match against England last year has once again become a matter of debate as all-rounder Ben Stokes in his book titled 'On Fire' questioned the intent of the Indian side.

Stokes also said that Dhoni's intent was questionable as he did not go for big shots when India still had a chance to win the match.

However, Holding said that nowadays people tend to write anything in their books.

"Well, people will write anything in books these days, because people are a lot more free with their opinions and when they are writing books, they need to be making headlines at times," Holding said on his official YouTube channel.

"But, to be honest, a lot of people watching that game perhaps wouldn't have arrived to the same conclusion that Ben Stokes arrived at that India were not trying to win," he added.

Holding did say that it seemed like that India did not have the same intensity as they would have had if the match was a do-or-die match.

"It was not the game that India had to win, but I don't think anyone can say that was a team tactic to lose the game. I watched that game and it appeared to me as if India weren't putting up their 100 per cent, but I realised it was not the case when the expression on MS Dhoni's face told me that he desperately wanted to win, so I do not think it was a team decision to not try to win," the former Windies pacer said.

"But I don't think they went with the same intensity of wanting to win the game, say, if it was a do-or-die situation. If it was, we would have seen a different game," he added.

On his official YouTube channel, Holding also said that no team goes in with a set pattern in terms of chasing targets.

In the round-robin stage match against England in Birmingham, India failed to chase down the massive target of 338 and fell short by 31 runs.

That was the only game that India lost in the premier tournament last year before the semifinal loss against the Kiwis.

India's chasing approach, in particular of wicket-keeper batsman Dhoni, was criticised by many, including the fans at home.

As soon as Stokes mentioned Dhoni's lack of intent in his book 'On Fire', Pakistan fans started saying that India deliberately lost the match to knock out their neighbours.

However, Stokes clarified that he never said India lost deliberately and some people were twisting his words.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 30,2020

Hamilton, Jan 30: Caught unaware about the Super Over scenario, Rohit Sharma took five minutes to “find” his abdomen guard after the third T20 International against New Zealand had ended in a tie on Wednesday.

The India vice-captain said the team had almost given up with New Zealand going great guns at one point.

“Everything was packed. All my stuff was inside my bag. I had to get it out. It literally took me five minutes to find my abdomen guard because I didn’t know where it was,” Rohit said.

“I mean we never thought it would go to the Super Over, the way they were batting at one point. It looked like they could easily win the game,” he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 28,2020

New Delhi, Jan 28: The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is clear that while they have no problem with the Pakistan Cricket Board hosting the 2020 edition of the Asia Cup -- set to be a preparatory ground for the T20 World Cup in Australia -- the venue needs to be a neutral one as travelling to the neighbouring country isn't an option at present.

Speaking to news agency, a BCCI official said that the hosting rights is not an issue and it is just a case of picking a neutral venue as the Indian team wouldn't be travelling to Pakistan for the T20 tournament that will see the top Asian teams in action.

"The question isn't about the PCB hosting the tournament. It is about the venue and as things stand now, it is quite clear that we would need a neutral venue. There is no way that an Indian team can visit Pakistan to even participate in a multi-nation event like the Asia Cup. If the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) is ok with an Asia Cup minus India then it is a different ball game. But if India is to participate in the Asia Cup, then the venue cannot be Pakistan," the official said.

In fact, issues in obtaining visa for Pakistan players to come and play the 2018 edition of the Asia Cup in India was one of the major reasons why the tournament was shifted out of the country with BCCI hosting the event in UAE.

The official said that the PCB can do just the same and host the event in a neutral venue. "A neutral venue is always an option. BCCI did it in 2018," the official pointed.

Cricket returned to Pakistan after a decade when Sri Lanka toured the nation in 2019. While Sri Lanka was the first nation to play a full series in the country, Bangladesh is currently in the country as they just finished playing three T20Is. They will play a Test from February 7 to 11 and then play a one-off ODI before playing the second Test from April 5 to 9.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.