At Eden, Sachin Tendulkar abandoned his pride

December 6, 2012

Tendulkar

The cheers that accompanied Sachin Tendulkar as he made his way to the middle were deafening as always. But what followed next, had most of them sitting with their fingers crossed for the best part of an hour.


It went like this: 2 dots, 1 run, 12 dots, 1 run, 4 dots, Edged four, 9 dots, 1 run, 4 dots, 1 run, 1 run, 5 dots, 1 run.


He just couldn’t get the ball away. Monty Panesar bowled two maidens at him. Steve Finn hit him on the shoulder. The edge of his bat was more prominent than the middle. But he simply didn’t care; he simply didn’t care about how he looked.

He scratched away — in the middle and at the last shreds of pride.


10 runs off 43 balls. 36 dot balls. 1 four.


And for that period, he didn’t look like a world beater. He didn’t look like someone who had 34,000 runs in international cricket. He looked desperate. He looked human. In fact, for what seemed like an inordinate amount of time, England were trying to get him on strike, that’s how insecure he was looking in the middle. A far cry from the days when the opposition would try and get him off strike in a bid to frustrate him. Keep Sachin away from the strike and sooner or later, his momentum will die.


It was a vision: Sachin in chains. But he manfully strained against them, keeping himself alive, giving himself some breathing space. Some might even call it ugly. It was in a way but it also encapsulated his current battle — against age, form and England.


Rahul Dravid on BBC’s Test Match Special couldn’t hide his admiration: “It’s fascinating to see such a legend willing to fight it out.” One couldn’t help but agree.


Then Steven Finn came into the attack. He has pace and height but not quite the control, not today. He erred and Tendulkar got two fours off him. The buzz of the crowd had long since died, now they spoke in hushed whispers. Nobody wanted to jinx him.


18 runs off 49 balls. 40 dot balls. 3 fours.


The next stage was slightly better. A single here, a single there, the odd two, an edged four in between. The impression one got was of a man just trying to stay afloat — sooner or later, help would arrive; sooner or later, he would come good. His belief shone through: If I stay at the wicket long enough, the runs will come.


26 runs off 64 balls. 50 dot balls. 4 fours.


At the other end, Tendulkar had seen Gambhir fall, when the opener attempted to cut a delivery that was too close to the stumps. Kohli, on the other hand, hung his bat outside the off-stump and edged it through to the slips. But Tendulkar had survived.


28 runs off 78 balls. 62 dot balls. 4 fours.


With the arrival of Yuvraj Singh, the tempo of the innings began to change. The left-hander played and missed a few times but his positive intent seemed to spark a little life into Tendulkar as well. Another edge went for four but then the master opened the face of his bat to guide the ball just back of square for four. Two fours in two balls. The crowd cheered wildly and then fell silent again. Nobody wanted to break his concentration.


36 runs off 84 balls. 66 dot balls. 6 fours.


Now, some confidence seemed to flow into Tendulkar’s stride. He was consciously trying to plant his front foot as far forward as possible. He was trying to do it all right. By the time, tea was called, he was just four short of his fifty.
46 runs off 98 balls. 77 dot balls. 8 fours.


But when Tendulkar came out after tea, he wanted to get on with things. It felt that way. A four off the first ball in the final session gave him his first half-century in almost a year — he got his last fifty in Syndey on January 3. He followed it up with another four off the very next ball.


54 runs off 100 balls. 77 dot balls. 10 fours.


But then again he settled into a dour rhythm. This was especially evident against Monty Panesar (he played out a total of 73 dot balls in his whole innings against the left-arm orthodox bowler).


63 runs off 124 balls. 95 dot balls. 11 fours.


At this point, he was pretty much starting to look like he had settled in for the long haul. The bowlers weren’t really troubling him much. The ball was pretty old as well. Anderson was bowling brilliantly and the odd ball would beat the batsmen but that was it.


69 runs off 149 balls. 117 dot balls. 12 fours.


Then came the end. Immediately after the drinks break, Anderson got one to seam away from the batsman. Tendulkar came forward to drive anyway, edged it and Matt Prior took a brilliant one-handed catch to his right. The innings was over. The crowd exhaled but they still wondered: Was he back?


76 runs off 154 balls. 123 dot balls. 13 fours.
Some might point to the runs and wonder why the question even needs to be asked. Others might point to the fours — especially the shot he hit off Panesar’s flighted delivery which was driven between cover and extra-cover. The timing and placement were class. But the real takeaway from this innings was the 123 dot balls he faced.


The dot balls above all showcased a desire to remain relevant in our cricketing conversations from reasons other than retirement. They showed the resolve to get down and dirty; to do the hard yards and even appear ordinary while trying to do it.


This wasn’t a monumental innings. This wasn’t Chennai in 1999 — where he made 136 despite a stiff back. This wasn’t the Sydney off 2004 — where he decided he wouldn’t play off-side shots. This was Kolkata; this was where Tendulkar abandoned his pride.
And this too must count.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 13,2020

New Delhi, Jun 13: Five centrally contracted Indian cricketers including Cheteshwar Pujara, Ravindra Jadeja and KL Rahul have been issued notices by National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) for failing to disclose their whereabouts as the BCCI cited "password glitch" as the reason for delay.

The other players to have received the notice include women stars Smriti Mandhana and Deepti Sharma, who are among the five cricketers in the 110 strong National Registered Testing Pool (NRTP). Speaking to PTI, NADA DG Navin Agarwal confirmed that BCCI has sent an official explanation for their five NRTP players' failure to submit whereabouts.

"There are two ways to fill up the whereabouts form in the ADAMS (Anti Doping Administration & Management Systems) software. Either athlete does it himself or association fills it up on his or her behalf," Agarwal said. "Now athletes in some discipline aren't educated enough or do not have access to internet and find themselves unable to handle the whereabouts clause of the ADAMS or upload the filled up

"They use assistance of their concerned federations. So federations have accepted responsibility of uploading their whereabouts," Agarwal said.

He said cricketers too at times find it tough to complete the process on their own. "Similarly in cricket also, although these people are well qualified and they can do it, perhaps they don't have the time for whatever reasons, so the federation concerned, the BCCI has taken upon itself the responsibility of uploading their whereabouts." So why didnt BCCI upload the the three-month whereabouts this time?

"Well they have given an explanation which appears to be reasonable but a decision will be taken. They have said that there has been a glitch with regards to password in ADAMS. Now they have said that issue has been resolved," Agarwal added. NADA DG added that "BCCI's explanation will be discussed as to whether it will be counted as one of three filing failures or not. It will be decided on the explanation given and how they (BCCI) proceed from here."

While country has been under lockdown, the rule to submit three months of whereabouts is mandatory. Three such failures to disclose leads to one Anti Doping Rule Violation (ADRV), which could lead up to two years of suspension upon hearing.

While BCCI has "officially gagged" its employees from talking to the media, it couldn't be ascertained that why as normal a glitch as a password error took days to resolve. A BCCI veteran, who has been privy to cricket operations, asked why the five cricketers were not told to upload the form themselves.

"This was lockdown period where they are not living out of suitcases. Some of the names have also engaged in multiple instagram chats and podcasts which their agents are managing," he said.

"If cricket operations team were having a glitch in fixing password, well the five cricketers could have been asked to do so and they would have done it individually with some guidance. "Probably NADA would be lenient this time but if it becomes an official warning, then who's responsible," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 29,2020

Kolkata, May 29: Former skipper Kumar Sangakkara believes missing Angelo Mathews due to an injury hurt Sri Lanka badly in the summit clash of the 2011 World Cup, which hosts India won after a gap of 28 years.

Having played a key role in their thrilling semifinal win against New Zealand, Mathews was forced out of the final against India at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium by a quadriceps muscle injury.

Reflecting on the six-wicket loss to India, the former Sri Lankan captain said Mathews' injury forced him to opt for a 6-5 combination and was also the reason behind his decision to bat first after winning the toss.

"In that WC final, that's the biggest thing I look back and think...You can talk about drop catches and all of that happens. But the composition of the side and the fact that we were forced to make the change was to me the turning point," Sangakkara said in the latest episode of Instagram series 'Reminisce with Ash' hosted by India off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin.

Mahela Jayawardene's unbeaten 103 went in vain as India hunted down 275 with Gautam Gambhir setting up the chase with a 97-run knock before skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni finished off in style, smashing Nuwan Kulasekara for the winning six in his unbeaten 91.

"But for 100 per cent, if Angelo (Mathews) had been fit, I know for sure we would have gone for chase... I'm not sure whether the result would have changed. That balance of team that Mathews would give at seven really was a bonus," the former wicketkeeper batsman said

"If you take our entire campaign, whatever we did Mathews' overs and his ability to bat with the tail and read situations was an incredible bonus to us. He was a young chap who came into the side and from day one he could read situations. It's just instinct, how to up the rate, how to control the bowler, when to accelerate."

During the conversation, Ashwin also asked him about the controversial toss when the coin was flipped twice amid the cacophony of the Wankhede and eventually Sangakkara elected to bat.

"The was crowd was huge. It never happens in Sri Lanka. Once I had this at Eden Gardens when I could not talk to the first slip and then of course at the Wankhede. I remember calling on the toss then Mahi wasn't sure and said did you call tail and I said no I called head.

"The match referee actually said I won the toss, Mahi said he did not. There was a little bit of confusion there and Mahi said let's have another toss of the coin and heads went up again," he said.

"I am not sure whether it was luck that I won. I believe probably India might have batted if I had lost."

The loss prolonged Sri Lanka's wait for another world title as yet again the 1996 champions failed in the final hurdle.

"Whether we win or lose, we have this equilibrium on how to take a win or loss. The smile hides a huge amount of sadness, of disappointment, of thinking of 20 million people back in Sri Lanka who had been waiting for this for so long, since 1996.

"We had an opportunity in 2011, opportunity in 2007, then T20 opportunities in 2009 and 2012," Sangakkara said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 13,2020

May 13: With the Olympics postponed due to the coronavirus, top Japanese fencer Ryo Miyake has swapped his metal mask and foil for a bike and backpack as a Tokyo UberEats deliveryman.

The 29-year-old, who won silver in the team foil at the 2012 London Olympics and was itching to compete in a home Games, says the job keeps him in shape physically and mentally -- and brings in much-needed cash.

"I started this for two reasons -- to save money for travelling (to future competitions) and to keep myself in physical shape," he told AFP.

"I see how much I am earning on the phone, but the number is not just money for me. It's a score to keep me going."

Japanese media have depicted Miyake as a poor amateur struggling to make ends meet but he himself asked for his three corporate sponsorships to be put on hold -- even if that means living off savings.

Like most of the world's top athletes, he is in limbo as the virus forces competitions to be cancelled and plays havoc with training schedules.

"I don't know when I can resume training or when the next tournament will take place. I don't even know if I can keep up my mental condition or motivation for another year," he said.

"No one knows how the qualification process will go. Pretending everything is OK for the competition is simply irresponsible."

In the meantime, he is happy criss-crossing the vast Japanese capital with bike and smartphone, joining a growing legion of Uber delivery staff in demand during the pandemic.

"When I get orders in the hilly Akasaka, Roppongi (downtown) district, it becomes good training," he smiles.

The unprecedented postponement of the Olympics hit Miyake hard, as he was enjoying a purple patch in his career.

After missing out on the Rio 2016 Olympics, Miyake came 13th in last year's World Fencing Championships -- the highest-ranked Japanese fencer at the competition.

The International Olympics Committee has set the new date for the Olympics on July 23, 2021.

But with no vaccine available for the coronavirus that has killed nearly 300,000 worldwide, even that hangs in the balance.

Miyake said the Japanese fencing team heard about the postponement the day after arriving in the United States for one of the final Olympic qualifying events.

With his diary suddenly free of training and competition, he said he spent the month of April agonising over what to do before hitting on the Uber idea.

"Sports and culture inevitably come second when people have to survive a crisis," he said.

"Is the Olympics really needed in the first place? Then what do I live for if not for the sport? That is what I kept thinking."

However, the new and temporary career delivering food in Tokyo has given the fencer a new drive to succeed.

"The most immediate objective for me is to be able to start training smoothly" once the emergency is lifted, he said.

"I need to be ready physically and financially for the moment. That is my biggest mission now."

But not all athletes may cope mentally with surviving another "nerve-wracking" pre-Olympic year, he said.

"It's like finally getting to the end of a 42-kilometre marathon and then being told you have to keep going."

As a child, Miyake practised his attacks on every wall of his house -- and he said his passion for the sport was what was driving him now.

"I love fencing. I want to be able to travel for matches and compete in the Olympics. That is the only reason I am doing this."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.