At Eden, Sachin Tendulkar abandoned his pride

December 6, 2012

Tendulkar

The cheers that accompanied Sachin Tendulkar as he made his way to the middle were deafening as always. But what followed next, had most of them sitting with their fingers crossed for the best part of an hour.


It went like this: 2 dots, 1 run, 12 dots, 1 run, 4 dots, Edged four, 9 dots, 1 run, 4 dots, 1 run, 1 run, 5 dots, 1 run.


He just couldn’t get the ball away. Monty Panesar bowled two maidens at him. Steve Finn hit him on the shoulder. The edge of his bat was more prominent than the middle. But he simply didn’t care; he simply didn’t care about how he looked.

He scratched away — in the middle and at the last shreds of pride.


10 runs off 43 balls. 36 dot balls. 1 four.


And for that period, he didn’t look like a world beater. He didn’t look like someone who had 34,000 runs in international cricket. He looked desperate. He looked human. In fact, for what seemed like an inordinate amount of time, England were trying to get him on strike, that’s how insecure he was looking in the middle. A far cry from the days when the opposition would try and get him off strike in a bid to frustrate him. Keep Sachin away from the strike and sooner or later, his momentum will die.


It was a vision: Sachin in chains. But he manfully strained against them, keeping himself alive, giving himself some breathing space. Some might even call it ugly. It was in a way but it also encapsulated his current battle — against age, form and England.


Rahul Dravid on BBC’s Test Match Special couldn’t hide his admiration: “It’s fascinating to see such a legend willing to fight it out.” One couldn’t help but agree.


Then Steven Finn came into the attack. He has pace and height but not quite the control, not today. He erred and Tendulkar got two fours off him. The buzz of the crowd had long since died, now they spoke in hushed whispers. Nobody wanted to jinx him.


18 runs off 49 balls. 40 dot balls. 3 fours.


The next stage was slightly better. A single here, a single there, the odd two, an edged four in between. The impression one got was of a man just trying to stay afloat — sooner or later, help would arrive; sooner or later, he would come good. His belief shone through: If I stay at the wicket long enough, the runs will come.


26 runs off 64 balls. 50 dot balls. 4 fours.


At the other end, Tendulkar had seen Gambhir fall, when the opener attempted to cut a delivery that was too close to the stumps. Kohli, on the other hand, hung his bat outside the off-stump and edged it through to the slips. But Tendulkar had survived.


28 runs off 78 balls. 62 dot balls. 4 fours.


With the arrival of Yuvraj Singh, the tempo of the innings began to change. The left-hander played and missed a few times but his positive intent seemed to spark a little life into Tendulkar as well. Another edge went for four but then the master opened the face of his bat to guide the ball just back of square for four. Two fours in two balls. The crowd cheered wildly and then fell silent again. Nobody wanted to break his concentration.


36 runs off 84 balls. 66 dot balls. 6 fours.


Now, some confidence seemed to flow into Tendulkar’s stride. He was consciously trying to plant his front foot as far forward as possible. He was trying to do it all right. By the time, tea was called, he was just four short of his fifty.
46 runs off 98 balls. 77 dot balls. 8 fours.


But when Tendulkar came out after tea, he wanted to get on with things. It felt that way. A four off the first ball in the final session gave him his first half-century in almost a year — he got his last fifty in Syndey on January 3. He followed it up with another four off the very next ball.


54 runs off 100 balls. 77 dot balls. 10 fours.


But then again he settled into a dour rhythm. This was especially evident against Monty Panesar (he played out a total of 73 dot balls in his whole innings against the left-arm orthodox bowler).


63 runs off 124 balls. 95 dot balls. 11 fours.


At this point, he was pretty much starting to look like he had settled in for the long haul. The bowlers weren’t really troubling him much. The ball was pretty old as well. Anderson was bowling brilliantly and the odd ball would beat the batsmen but that was it.


69 runs off 149 balls. 117 dot balls. 12 fours.


Then came the end. Immediately after the drinks break, Anderson got one to seam away from the batsman. Tendulkar came forward to drive anyway, edged it and Matt Prior took a brilliant one-handed catch to his right. The innings was over. The crowd exhaled but they still wondered: Was he back?


76 runs off 154 balls. 123 dot balls. 13 fours.
Some might point to the runs and wonder why the question even needs to be asked. Others might point to the fours — especially the shot he hit off Panesar’s flighted delivery which was driven between cover and extra-cover. The timing and placement were class. But the real takeaway from this innings was the 123 dot balls he faced.


The dot balls above all showcased a desire to remain relevant in our cricketing conversations from reasons other than retirement. They showed the resolve to get down and dirty; to do the hard yards and even appear ordinary while trying to do it.


This wasn’t a monumental innings. This wasn’t Chennai in 1999 — where he made 136 despite a stiff back. This wasn’t the Sydney off 2004 — where he decided he wouldn’t play off-side shots. This was Kolkata; this was where Tendulkar abandoned his pride.
And this too must count.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 2,2020

Jul 2: Cricket Australia has decided to not use the Dukes ball from this summer's Sheffield Shield, having used it alongside Kookaburra for four seasons.

CA has confirmed that the Kookaburra ball will be used for the entire 2020-21 first-class season.

Australia has been using Dukes ball since the 2016-17 season in Shield matches with an aim to help its cricketers prepare for the hostile English conditions.

CA's Head of Cricket Operations, Peter Roach, said the decision to axe the Dukes was the right call. "The introduction of the Dukes ball has been a worthwhile exercise, particularly in the lead up to overseas Ashes series where the Dukes is used so well by our English opponents," Roach said.

"We have been happy with how the ball has performed when used in Australian conditions over the past four seasons. We do, however, feel that reverting to one ball for 2020-21 will provide the consistent examination of our players over a full season that CA and the states are presently seeking. The Kookaburra is the ball used for international cricket in Australia and many parts of the world and we see benefits this season of maximising our use of it," he added.

Roach said the ineffectiveness of spinners in first-class cricket in recent times played a role in CA's decision to do away with the Dukes. "We have noted that spin bowlers in the Sheffield Shield have been playing less of a role in recent seasons, most notably in games when the Dukes ball is in use. We need spinners bowling in first-class cricket and we need our batters facing spin. We hope that the change to one ball will have a positive benefit here," he said.

The CA official, however, didn't rule out the possibility of re-introducing it later.

"We see a definite opportunity to reintroduce the Dukes ball at some stage in the future."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
April 2,2020

Lausanne, Apr 2: The postponement of the Tokyo Olympics and the shutdown of the sporting calendar because of the coronavirus pandemic are going to hit international sports federations hard financially.

Many sports that are part of the Games depend heavily on the payouts every four years from the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

"The situation is tense and very gloomy. An assessment will be made, but clearly some posts are under threat," said an official of a major international federation.

The 28 international federations (IF) of the sports that were due to be present at the Tokyo Olympics, would have received substantial sums from the IOC.

However, the postponement of the Games until 2021 could lead to a freeze of their payment.

"We have a lot of IF with substantial reserves, but others work on a different business model, they have income from major events which are suspended, which can be a problem for the cashflow if they don't have enough reserves," said Andrew Ryan, director general of the Association of International Olympic Summer Sports Federations (ASOIF), which is responsible for distributing this money.

The five additions to the Tokyo Games programme - karate, surfing, skateboarding, climbing and baseball/softball - are not eligible.

The Olympic payout totalled 520 million after the Rio Games, four years ago.

"The Olympic money could be less than for Rio 2016," Ryan warned before adding: "My advice is to budget the same as in Rio".

The federations receive money on a sliding scale determined by their audience and size.

The three largest (athletics, swimming and gymnastics) can expect approximately 40 million.

For the second tier, made up of cycling, basketball, volleyball, football and tennis, the sum is 25 million.

For group three, which contains eight sports, including boxing, rowing, judo and table tennis, it is 17 million.

The nine sports in the next level (including sailing, canoing and fencing) receive 12 million.

For the three in the last category (rugby, golf, modern pentathlon) the payout is 7 million.

For the largest associations, such as football's FIFA which has a 1.5 billion nest egg, or basketball body FIBA which has CHF 44.4 million (42 million euros) in reserves, IOC aid represents a small proportion of their income.

For others, it is vital.

"Some IF probably don't have the cashflow to survive one year," said Ryan.

For most federations, the postponement of the Olympic Games has a domino effect, forcing them to reschedule their own money-earning competitions.

"The revenues from these events will eventually come in," said Ryan. "But this impacts the cashflow." World Athletics has already postponed the 2021 World Championships in Eugene, Oregon to 2022.

The International Swimming Federation (FINA) will have to do the same for its World Championships scheduled for next summer in Fukuoka, Japan, when they would probably clash with the Tokyo Games.

"One edition of the World Championships means for us 10 million in revenues," said one sports federation official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"If this income is postponed, totally or partially, for a year, we will face major problems, especially if the IOC money, originally expected in September, is not paid out."

The Singapore-based International Table Tennis Federation has already taken steps, with "the Executive Committee agreeing to reduce their expenses and senior staff offering to take a salary reduction," said marketing director Matt Pound, but, he added,"further cuts will take place if needed."

- 'Significant loss of revenue' -

The ITTF has suspended all its competitions until June and that is costly.

Kim Andersen, the Danish president of London-based World Sailing, said commercial revenues are not immune.

"The IOC will eventually pay out its aid, but what weighs most heavily is the uncertainty about whether our competitions will be held and whether our sponsors will be maintained," he said.

The IOC is not prepared to go into details of what it plans.

"It is not possible at this stage to assess the overall impact" of the postponement of the Tokyo Olympics, an official told AFP.

"It depends on a number of variables that are currently being studied." According to an official of one federation: "the IOC will discuss on a case-by-case basis, sport by sport".

Another option is for the federations to ask for a share of the public aid set up to deal with the coronavirus crisis, in Switzerland, where 22 ASOIF members are based and also in the United Kingdom, home of World Sailing.

"Can sports federations benefit from federal aid? The answer is yes, in principle," Philippe Leuba, State Councillor of the canton of Vaud, in charge of the economy and sport, told.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 9,2020

New Delhi, Apr 9: The legendary Kapil Dev on Thursday slammed Shoaib Akhtar's idea of a made-for-television three-match ODI series between India and Pakistan to raise funds for the Covid19 pandemic, saying "India doesn't need the money" and it is not worth risking lives for a cricket match.

Speaking to news agency, Akhtar on Wednesday proposed a closed-door series to jointly raise funds to fight the deadly virus both in India and Pakistan. Dev said the proposal is not feasible.

"He is entitled to his opinion but we don't need to raise the money. We have enough. For us, what is important right now is how our authorities work together to deal with this crisis. I am still seeing a lot of blame game on television from the politicians and that needs to stop," Dev said.

"Anyway, the BCCI has donated a hefty amount (Rs 51 crore) for the cause and is in a position to donate much more if the need arises. It doesn't need to raise funds.

"The situation is unlikely to get normal anytime soon and organising a cricket game means putting our cricketers at risk which we don't need to," said the World Cup-winning former captain.

Dev said cricket should not even matter for at least the next six months.

"It is just not worth the risk. And how much money can you make from three games? In my view, you can't even think of cricket for the next five to six months," he said.

Dev said the focus, at the moment, should only be on saving lives and taking care of the poor who are struggling to make ends meet in a lockdown situation.

"Cricket will resume when things get normal. The game can't be bigger than the country. The pressing issue is to look after the poor, the hospital workers, the police and all other people who are on the frontline of this war," said the 61-year-old.

As an Indian, Dev feels proud that his country is in a position help other nations including the United States.

President Donald Trump has thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for helping the United States with the supply of hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial drug being touted as a potential cure for Covid19 patients.

"Helping others is in our culture and I feel proud about that. We should not seek credit after helping others. We should strive to become a nation which gives more and more rather than taking from others," he said.

Like everyone else, Dev is at home and practising social distancing.

Asked how he views the current situation, he said: "Nelson Mandela stayed in a tiny cell for 27 years. Compared to that, we are in a privileged position (that we just have to stay at home for sometime)."

"There is nothing bigger than life at the moment and that is what we need to save."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.