Davis Cup: Korea trample India on day one

February 2, 2013

Ranjeet_Virali_MurugesanNew Delhi, Feb 2: Hope quickly gave way to uncertainty, and uncertainty to reality. India’s Davis Cup campaign, in the absence of its top players, got off to a miserable start with the home side trailing 0-2 against South Korea at the end of the opening day of Asia-Oceania Group ‘I’ tie at the RK Khanna Stadium here on Friday.

Ranjeet Virali Murugesan, the No.1 player for India in the tie, produced a below par performance during his 1-6, 0-6, 1-6 surrender to Min-Hyeok Cho before a cramping Vijayant Malik conceded the match when trailing 4-6, 5-7, 0-3 against Suk-Young Jeong.

Rankings matter little in Davis Cup and one hoped the two debutants would get the adrenaline rushing and raise their game. It had happened in the past but not today.

The drums, the noisy chants and even the fluttering national flags waved by Leander Paes and company at the sidelines could not inspire a change of fortunes. Not even Sania Mirza’ pressence in the stands. Firepower was missing and nerves got prominence.

Ranjeet, after leading 40-15 in the first game, slipped to drop his serve and could never revive his game. He was tight in his movements, struggled to put the ball in play and made a rash of errors. Cho easily wore him down in a few odd rallies with fluent hitting and whenever Ranjeet clambered to the net, he was treated to some rasping passing shots.

Bad struggle

In fact, Cho only grew better with each point, partly due to his Indian counterpart, whose game simply fell apart. So badly did Ranjeet struggle that he could hold his serve only once during the match.

The solitary blemish in the unranked Korean’s game was when he dropped his serve in the fourth game of the first set. But he swiftly recovered to reel off 12 games before Ranjeet held in the fourth game of the final set. It served momentary reprieve. Cho didn’t give away anything afterwards and closed the set and match with a forehand crosscourt winner, dropping only two points on the way.

It put curtains on a painful viewing and shifted focus on 22-year-old Vijayant, who now had the responsibility to put the home team on even keel.

He indeed showed promise with his power-packed strokes. The boy from Panipat fought for each point and stretched Jeong several times in the match. He served with purpose, fearlessly engaged in rallies but his forehand proved to be his undoing. He dropped his serve in the fifth game of the match following two forehand errors and Jeong, quick on feet and solid on serve, sprinted to take the lead.

Egged on, Vijayant carried his attacking game to the second set. A scorching backhand down the line gave him three breakpoints but he couldn’t convert any. Not even the fourth opportunity that came after the two deuces in the game before throwing it all away with a poor backhand.

He dropped his serve in the 11th game to lag 5-7 and immediately asked for a medical timeout. On return, the Korean comfortably served out the set and the match.

Vijayant got broken straightaway in the third set and in the third game fell to the ground grimacing after hitting a backhand return. His exit wrapped up a forgettable day for India, who would look up to their doubles exponent Paes and another debutant Purav Raja to get them their first point in the tie and another day to fight.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 12,2020

New Delhi, Jul 12: Former India batsman Sachin Tendulkar has urged the International Cricket Council (ICC) to do away with 'umpire's call' whenever a team opts for a review regarding a leg-before wicket (LBW) decision.

The Master Blaster has also said that a batsman should be given out if the ball is hitting the stumps.

Whether more than 50 per cent of the ball is hitting the stumps or not should not be matter, he further stated.

"What per cent of the ball hits the stumps doesn't matter, if DRS shows us that the ball is hitting the stumps, it should be given out, regardless of the on-field call," Tendulkar tweeted.

With this tweet, the former India batsman also shared a video, in which he has a discussion with Brian Lara regarding the working of DRS.
"One thing I don't agree with, with the ICC, is the DRS they have been using for quite some time. It is the LBW decision where more than 50 per cent of the ball must be hitting the stumps for the on-field decision to be overturned," Tendulkar said in the video.

"The only reason they (the batsman or the bowler) have gone upstairs is that they are unhappy with the on-field decision, so when the decision goes to the third umpire, let the technology take over, just like in tennis, it's either in or out, there's nothing in between," he added.

This call for doing away with umpire's call has been recommended by many former players.
Whenever a verdict pops up as 'umpire's call, the decision of the on-field umpire is not changed, but the teams do not lose their review as well.

ICC recently introduced some changes to the game of cricket, and they gave all teams liberty of extra review as non-neutral umpires will be employed in Test matches due to the coronavirus pandemic.

As a result, all teams will now have three reviews in every innings of a Test match. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 30,2020

Hamilton, Jan 30: Caught unaware about the Super Over scenario, Rohit Sharma took five minutes to “find” his abdomen guard after the third T20 International against New Zealand had ended in a tie on Wednesday.

The India vice-captain said the team had almost given up with New Zealand going great guns at one point.

“Everything was packed. All my stuff was inside my bag. I had to get it out. It literally took me five minutes to find my abdomen guard because I didn’t know where it was,” Rohit said.

“I mean we never thought it would go to the Super Over, the way they were batting at one point. It looked like they could easily win the game,” he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
August 6,2020

New Delhi, Aug 6: The BCCI on Thursday suspended the IPL title sponsorship deal with Chinese mobile phone company Vivo for the event's upcoming edition amid heightened tensions in Sino-India diplomatic ties.

The BCCI sent out a one-line statement, without giving details, saying that Vivo would not be associated with the IPL this year. "The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and vivo Mobile India Pvt Ltd have decided to suspend their partnership for Indian Premier League in 2020," the statement said.

Meanwhile, Vivo released its own statement saying that the two entities "have mutually decided to pause their partnership for the 2020 season".

Vivo won the IPL title sponsorship rights for five years from 2018 to 2022 for a reported sum of Rs 2,190 crore, approximately Rs 440 crore per annum.

The two parties are now working out a plan in which Vivo might come back for a fresh three-year period starting 2021 on revised terms.

However, a top BCCI official offered a different view. "Here we are talking about diplomatic tensions and you expect that after November, when IPL ends and before the next IPL starts in April 2021, there would be no anti-China sentiment? Are we serious?" a veteran BCCI official said on conditions of anonymity.

The anti-China sentiment in the country peaked after the violent face-off between the Indian and Chinese troops in eastern Ladakh. India lost 20 soldiers in the clash, while China also acknowledged unspecified casualties.

The stand-off at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) caused outrage across India with several calls for boycotts of Chinese companies and products.

The BCCI is now likely to float a tender for new IPL title sponsors as mandated by its constitution. The glitzy T20 league starts on Sept. 19 in the UAE, forced out of India due to the rising COVID-19 cases.

The new development is in stark contrast to what came out of Sunday's IPL's Governing Council meeting, where it was decided that Vivo, along with all the other sponsors, will remain on board.

This was after the BCCI had announced in June that all sponsorship deals pertaining to IPL will be reviewed in the aftermath of the clash in the Galwan Valley.

However, after Sunday's meeting, there was a huge backlash on social media about the BCCI holding on to Vivo.

Both parties then began thrashing out an amicable separation plan, at least for this season.

However, the end of this deal could spell losses for the franchises as they get a substantial share from the sponsorship pool. Half of the annual Vivo sponsorship money is distributed equally among eight franchises, which comes to Rs 27.5 crore.

"As of now, it will be very difficult for the BCCI to match the sponsorship amount at such short notice. Therefore, both BCCI and the franchises should be prepared to lose out on some money -- BCCI more but each franchise from Vivo's exit will potentially lose 15 crore," the official said.

"This year will be difficult for everyone but the show must go on," the official said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.