When players' greed trumped glorious game

May 21, 2013
iplBangalore, May 21: The sixth edition of the Indian Premier League is a story of exhilarating highs and disappointing lows.

While the Chris Gayles, Kieron Pollards and David Millers repeatedly tried to convince us that this format is made for batsmen with batsmanship never seen before, the likes of Dale Steyn, Amit Mishra and Vinay Kumar showed that bowlers weren’t entirely out of place in the slam-bang version.

Much as the T20 detractors would want us believe otherwise, the quality of cricket was of high class. However, the spot-fixing scandal involving three Rajasthan Royals’ players -- S Sreesanth, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan -- took the sheen out of what was easily the tightest league phase in the short history of the cash-rich T20 tournament.

While the authorities are still grappling to understand the magnitude of the dangerous nexus between players and bookies, there is no doubt that the credibility of the controversy-ridden event took a further beating in the eyes of the public and its global critics.

Putting aside this unsavoury incident, let’s take a look at 46 days of non-stop cricket that saw many edge-of-the-seat thrillers, stunning individual performances, the ecstacy of winners and the agony of losers.

No team in the nine-team pool would be feeling as hard done by as do the Royal Challengers Bangalore who for the second year running missed a play-off berth by a whisker. It’s a mere coincidence that it was the team from Hyderabad that spoiled the Bangalore party on both occasions.

In 2012, RCB needed a simple win over the erstwhile Deccan Chargers to make the last four ahead of Chennai Super Kings. But they contrived to lose a low-scoring match to crash out.

This year, however, they needed Kolkata Knight Riders to beat Sunrisers Hyderabad, who too were on 18 points but with an inferior net run-rate, to qualify for the play-offs. After an artificial excitement, Sunrisers won the match to seal the fourth slot behind Super Kings, Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals.

The Virat Kohli-led side, though, has to blame itself for their campaign ending in another heart-break. Half-way through their set of matches, they were sitting on top with 12 points and were strong favourites to make the play-offs. But their poor run away from home -- six losses in eight -- coupled with a defeat against Kings XI Punjab at Chinnaswamy stadium put paid to their aspirations.

On the positive note, Kohli, named the full-time captain, led the side with admirable maturity notwithstanding his run-ins with Gautam Gambhir and the booing Mumbai crowd. Gayle once again showed he is the ultimate superstar when it comes to the shortest format. His 68-ball 175 against Warriors will take some effort to be surpassed.

Their neighbours Super Kings once again showed why they are the most successful side in this tournament. The two-time champions, despite losing two home games at the start, managed to top the league with some dominant performances. Skipper MS Dhoni’s influence has been obvious but the prolific Michael Hussey and the young paceman Mohit Sharma were testimony to Chennai’s meticulous planning while investing in players.

Indeed, their eye for talent, both Indian and foreign, has been unmatched.

Another star-studded franchise, Mumbai Indians, deservedly finished second. The only team to have beaten Chennai at home and away, they were powered by some incredible individual shows.

From skipper Rohit Sharma, who replaced Ricky Ponting at the helm, to Kieron Pollard and from Harbhajan Singh to Mitchell Johnson, they found players rising to the challenge. The only sour note for them was Ponting’s inability to reinvent his past prowess and to a lesser extent Sachin Tendulkar’s waning firepower.

KKR and Sunrisers presented perfect contrasts in fortunes. The defending champions didn’t even qualify, finishing with 12 points while Sunrisers, the newest franchise, turned most calculations upside down with inspiring cricket. With no real depth in batting and lacking on star quotient, Sunrisers thrived as a unit.

They turned Hyderabad into a fortress, winning seven of their eight home matches. On a slow and low pitch, their bowlers either restricted the opponents to low totals or defended small targets with incisive bowling.

The high of Sunrisers can only be matched by the depths that the Delhi Daredevils plunged to. For a team that finished on top of the league the previous year, a last-place finish was astonishing. The absence of Kevin Pietersen and Jesse Ryder did rob Delhi of two hard-hitting batsmen but their problems stemmed from inconsistency.

Whether it was Virender Sehwag or Mahela Jayawardene in batting or Morne Morkel in bowling, they were all pale shadows of their  past.

The fortunes of Pune Warriors, who avoided successive wooden spoon, didn’t change much though. Strange selection policies to cold form of their key players ensured that Warriors always fell short of that winning effort.

The effort from Kings XI Punjab came a bit too late. Having endured a string of losses at the start, they were always playing the catch-up game. Punjab, though, came up with some stirring performances.

Miller’s blazing century against RCB and Adam Glichrist’s perfect IPL swansong, with a win over Mumbai in front of home crowd, were some of the abiding memories of this edition which unfortunately will be remembered for the wrong reasons.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 19,2020

Dubai, Jul 19: On hold for the past two months, the fate of this year's T20 World Cup will be up for a decisive round of deliberation when the ICC board meets virtually on Monday with the BCCI hoping for a postponement to ensure that the IPL can go ahead.

The global event is supposed to be held from October 18 to November 15 in Australia but the country's cricket board had, in May itself, expressed its inability to host amid a second surge of Covid-19 cases in the state of Victoria.

With India's case load also exceeding the 10 lakh mark, including more than 26,000 deaths, the IPL, if it is held, is likely to move to the UAE once the central government gives its go ahead.

"The first step was postponement of Asia Cup, which has happened. We can only start to move ahead with our plans after the ICC announces the postponement. They have been sitting on the decision even after Cricket Australia said that they are not too keen on hosting the event," a BCCI Apex Council member told PTI on conditions of anonymity.

This year's T20 World Cup will likely be held in Australia in 2022 as India doesn't want to swap its 2021 hosting rights with Cricket Australia as of now.

That Australia won't be hosting the mega event was clear after the cricket board told its players to prepare for a white-ball series against England scheduled for late September.

CA has even announced a 26-strong preliminary squad for that tour.

The ICC, on its part, has maintained that it wants to explore all possible "contingency" options before taking a call of such immense magnitude. And it is not unusual for the governing body to wait this long.

"Pakistan was supposed to host the Champions Trophy in 2009. After the terrorist attacks on the Sri Lankan team bus, everyone in their proper senses knew that PCB will never host a big event in distant future," said a source familiar with the functioning of the ICC.

"Yet, ICC deputed its employees in Pakistan for months when South Africa was already preparing to host the event. Everyone knew but a formal announcement of shift took months as threat assessment was part of protocol.

"The ICC couldn't have just postponed 9the T20 World Cup) immediately as initially, the top ministers of the Australian government expressed keenness to host," he added.

The Pakistan Cricket Board has also resigned itself to this outcome after vehemently opposing the Indian board.

The postponement of Asia Cup, which was supposed to be hosted by the PCB, to 2021 was a big blow to Ehsan Mani and his team.

"We have had a lot of discussions and the feeling is it (T20 World Cup) would not be possible this year. ICC has World Cups lined up in 2021 and 2023 so we have a gap year where we can adjust this event," Mani had recently said while talking to reporters in his country.

It has been learnt that PCB is contacting other boards in the hope of finalising some bilateral engagements as the national team has nothing lined up after its England tour.

Nomination process for Chairman's election:

The other issue that is likely to come up for discussion in Monday's meeting is the nomination process for the next independent chairman of the ICC after Shashank Manohar's resignation earlier this month.

It is learnt that there is no consensus on what should be the criteria in case multiple candidates join the fray.

"The board is not united on whether the usual 2/3rd majority to decide will be used (as its in case of policy decision) or the case of simple majority among the 17 board members," an ICC Board member said.

England and Wales Cricket Board's Colin Graves was considered the top contender with BCCI president Sourav Ganguly's name also being floated.

Ganguly's candidature will certainly depend on whether the Supreme Court waives off the cooling off period and allows him to continue as BCCI president beyond July 27 when he completes six years as an office-bearer in the Indian Board's state and national units.

When asked about the possibility of taking up the ICC job in a recent interview, the 48-year-old said he is young and and in no hurry for the position.

New Zealand's Gregor Barclay, Hong Kong's Imran Khawaja, who is currently the interim chairman, are also being talked about as potential candidates.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
August 6,2020

New Delhi, Aug 6: The BCCI on Thursday suspended the IPL title sponsorship deal with Chinese mobile phone company Vivo for the event's upcoming edition amid heightened tensions in Sino-India diplomatic ties.

The BCCI sent out a one-line statement, without giving details, saying that Vivo would not be associated with the IPL this year. "The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and vivo Mobile India Pvt Ltd have decided to suspend their partnership for Indian Premier League in 2020," the statement said.

Meanwhile, Vivo released its own statement saying that the two entities "have mutually decided to pause their partnership for the 2020 season".

Vivo won the IPL title sponsorship rights for five years from 2018 to 2022 for a reported sum of Rs 2,190 crore, approximately Rs 440 crore per annum.

The two parties are now working out a plan in which Vivo might come back for a fresh three-year period starting 2021 on revised terms.

However, a top BCCI official offered a different view. "Here we are talking about diplomatic tensions and you expect that after November, when IPL ends and before the next IPL starts in April 2021, there would be no anti-China sentiment? Are we serious?" a veteran BCCI official said on conditions of anonymity.

The anti-China sentiment in the country peaked after the violent face-off between the Indian and Chinese troops in eastern Ladakh. India lost 20 soldiers in the clash, while China also acknowledged unspecified casualties.

The stand-off at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) caused outrage across India with several calls for boycotts of Chinese companies and products.

The BCCI is now likely to float a tender for new IPL title sponsors as mandated by its constitution. The glitzy T20 league starts on Sept. 19 in the UAE, forced out of India due to the rising COVID-19 cases.

The new development is in stark contrast to what came out of Sunday's IPL's Governing Council meeting, where it was decided that Vivo, along with all the other sponsors, will remain on board.

This was after the BCCI had announced in June that all sponsorship deals pertaining to IPL will be reviewed in the aftermath of the clash in the Galwan Valley.

However, after Sunday's meeting, there was a huge backlash on social media about the BCCI holding on to Vivo.

Both parties then began thrashing out an amicable separation plan, at least for this season.

However, the end of this deal could spell losses for the franchises as they get a substantial share from the sponsorship pool. Half of the annual Vivo sponsorship money is distributed equally among eight franchises, which comes to Rs 27.5 crore.

"As of now, it will be very difficult for the BCCI to match the sponsorship amount at such short notice. Therefore, both BCCI and the franchises should be prepared to lose out on some money -- BCCI more but each franchise from Vivo's exit will potentially lose 15 crore," the official said.

"This year will be difficult for everyone but the show must go on," the official said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 27,2020

Lahore, Apr 27: Pakistan batsman Umar Akmal has been banned from all forms of cricket for three years for failing to report spot-fixing offers, the Pakistan Cricket Board announced Monday.

Umar, who turns 30 next month, pleaded guilty to not reporting the fixing offers which led to his provisional suspension on February 20 this year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.