Political storm in Punjab after minor girl molested, thrown off bus owned by CM’s family

May 1, 2015

Moga, May 1: A day after a minor girl died after being allegedly molested and thrown off a running bus belonging to the ruling Badal family in Punjab, the police on Thursday arrested four persons, including the bus driver, conductor and helper. The victim’s mother also suffered injuries after she was reportedly thrown off the bus too.

Political stormAccording to reports, the incident took place near Gill village on Moga-Kotkapura road, late on Wednesday. The bus belongs to Orbit Company, owned by Orbit Aviation Pvt Ltd, of which Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Badal is a co-owner.

While Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal admitted that the bus belonged to a company owned by his family, but said he personally “never took interest” in its affairs, Punjab DGP Sumedh Singh Saini ruled out any questioning of the owners of Orbit Aviation Pvt Ltd, including Sukhbir Badal.

Describing the incident as “very unfortunate and sad”, the CM said, “Law will take its course. A case of murder has been registered and other sections have been added on the basis of the statement made by the injured woman.”

The victim, Arshdeep Kaur, 13, was travelling with her mother Shinder Kaur, 35, and brother, Akashdeep Singh, 15, from Moga to Bathinda when she was allegedly molested.

Speaking to The Indian Express at the Civil Hospital in Moga, Akashdeep said: “My mother and sister were sitting in the rear seats. At first, the bus conductor and his helper started misbehaving with my sister. They touched her and passed comments. Later, a third man who boarded the bus at Baghapurana toll plaza also joined them.”

Akashdeep said his mother called for help, but none of the passengers responded. “I tried to help them but one of the men caught hold of me… There were about eight or 10 passengers, including some women. Nobody helped us. When my sister and mother continued to resist, they pushed my mother out of the rear door, and then immediately pushed my sister out also,” he said.

When he saw his mother and sister being pushed out, Akashdeep said he jumped out of the bus too. He saw his sister lying unconscious on the road. “I borrowed a phone from a person passing by and called up my father,” he said, adding that both his sister and mother had suffered head injuries. They were rushed to the Moga Civil Hospital, where the girl was declared dead.

“They were touching my daughter on her chest, on her hands… She was crying for help. I tried to help and asked the driver to stop them. Nobody listened. There were other passengers, but nobody helped. As I tried to stop them, they made obscene gestures and laughed. My daughter was being harassed continuously… they then threw us out of the bus,” said Shinder Kaur.

Her husband, Sukhdev Singh, a labourer, said he would not allow a post-mortem till the police arrested all the accused and named the driver in the FIR.

“The bus belongs to the Badals… We demand action against the bus driver. We will not perform the last rites till the driver is booked,” said the victim’s grandmother, Surjit Kaur.

According to the FIR, however, Shinder Kaur said in her statement that the scuffle with the conductor started over tickets. The bus driver, Ranjit Singh, conductor Sukhwinder Singh, helper Gurdeep Singh, and the fourth accused Amarjeet Singh have been arrested. The last three have been charged under Sections 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder) and 354 (molestation) of IPC.

“We have arrested the driver as investigations revealed that he did not stop the bus when the incident occurred,” said Moga SSP J S Khaira.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 11,2020

New Delhi, Jun 11: Union Minister Kiren Rijiju on Thursday said the religious and constitutional rights of minorities are absolutely safe in India and it does not need any certificate from anyone as communal harmony and tolerance are in the DNA of the country and its majority community.

Comments of Rijiju, a Buddhist, came after a top Trump administration official has said that the US is very concerned about what is happening in India in terms of religious freedom.

"India doesn't need certificate on communal harmony and tolerance which is in the DNA of India and the majority community in India," Rijiju, who holds the charge of the Union minister of state for minority affairs besides being the union sports minister, said in a statement.

Rijiju said the social, religious and constitutional rights of minorities are absolutely safe in the country.

"A few politically intolerant people are trying to create an atmosphere of fear and intolerance. As a member of the minority community, I feel India is the best country in the world for the minorities," he said.

Samuel Brownback, the US Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, said on Wednesday that India has been a country area that spawned four major religions itself.

"We do remain very concerned about what's taking place in India. It's historically just been a very tolerant, respectful country of religions, of all religions," he said.

The trendlines have been troubling in India because it is such a religious subcontinent and seeing a lot more communal violence, Brownback said.

His comments came after the release of the '2019 International Religious Freedom Report'.

Mandated by the US Congress, the report documenting major instances of the violation of religious freedom across the world was released by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at the State Department.

India has previously rejected the US religious freedom report, saying it sees no locus standi for a foreign government to pronounce on the state of its citizens' constitutionally protected rights.

"India is proud of its secular credentials, its status as the largest democracy and a pluralistic society with a longstanding commitment to tolerance and inclusion", the government had said earlier.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 10,2020

New Delhi, Jan 10: The Supreme Court while hearing petitions challenging restrictions in Jammu and Kashmir on Friday stated that the right to access the internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

"It is no doubt that freedom of speech is an essential tool in a democratic setup. The freedom of Internet access is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution," a two-judge bench headed by Justice N V Ramana stated while reading out the judgment.

The top court said that Kashmir has seen a lot of violence and that it will try to maintain a balance between human rights and freedoms with the issue of security.

It also directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the region within a week. “The citizens should be provided highest security and liberty,” the apex court added.

The top court made observations and issued directions while pronouncing the verdict on a number of petitions challenging the restrictions and internet blockade imposed in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370 in August last year.

The Supreme Court had on November 27 reserved the judgment on a batch of petitions challenging restrictions imposed on communication, media and telephone services in Jammu and Kashmir pursuant to revocation of Article 370.

The court heard the petitions filed by various petitioners including Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad and Kashmir Times editor Anuradha Bhasin.

The petitions were filed after the central government scrapped Article 370 in August and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Following this, phone lines and the internet were blocked in the region.

The government had, however, contended that it has progressively eased restrictions.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 15,2020

New Delhi, Jan 15: The Delhi government Wednesday told the high court that execution of the death row convicts in the Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case will not take place on January 22 as a mercy plea has been filed by one of them.

The four convicts -- Vinay Sharma (26), Mukesh Kumar (32), Akshay Kumar Singh (31) and Pawan Gupta (25) -- are to be hanged on January 22 at 7 am in Tihar jail. A Delhi court had issued their death warrants on January 7.

Justices Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal were told by the Delhi government and the Centre that the petition filed by convict Mukesh, challenging his death warrant, was premature.

The Delhi government and the prison authorities informed the court that under the rules, it will have to wait for the mercy plea to be decided before executing the death warrant.

They also said that none of the four convicts can be executed on January 22 unless the present mercy plea is decided.

The Supreme Court had on Tuesday dismissed the curative pleas of Mukesh and Vinay.

The mercy plea hearing began Wednesday morning and will continue in the afternoon.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.