Political storm in Punjab after minor girl molested, thrown off bus owned by CM’s family

May 1, 2015

Moga, May 1: A day after a minor girl died after being allegedly molested and thrown off a running bus belonging to the ruling Badal family in Punjab, the police on Thursday arrested four persons, including the bus driver, conductor and helper. The victim’s mother also suffered injuries after she was reportedly thrown off the bus too.

Political stormAccording to reports, the incident took place near Gill village on Moga-Kotkapura road, late on Wednesday. The bus belongs to Orbit Company, owned by Orbit Aviation Pvt Ltd, of which Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Badal is a co-owner.

While Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal admitted that the bus belonged to a company owned by his family, but said he personally “never took interest” in its affairs, Punjab DGP Sumedh Singh Saini ruled out any questioning of the owners of Orbit Aviation Pvt Ltd, including Sukhbir Badal.

Describing the incident as “very unfortunate and sad”, the CM said, “Law will take its course. A case of murder has been registered and other sections have been added on the basis of the statement made by the injured woman.”

The victim, Arshdeep Kaur, 13, was travelling with her mother Shinder Kaur, 35, and brother, Akashdeep Singh, 15, from Moga to Bathinda when she was allegedly molested.

Speaking to The Indian Express at the Civil Hospital in Moga, Akashdeep said: “My mother and sister were sitting in the rear seats. At first, the bus conductor and his helper started misbehaving with my sister. They touched her and passed comments. Later, a third man who boarded the bus at Baghapurana toll plaza also joined them.”

Akashdeep said his mother called for help, but none of the passengers responded. “I tried to help them but one of the men caught hold of me… There were about eight or 10 passengers, including some women. Nobody helped us. When my sister and mother continued to resist, they pushed my mother out of the rear door, and then immediately pushed my sister out also,” he said.

When he saw his mother and sister being pushed out, Akashdeep said he jumped out of the bus too. He saw his sister lying unconscious on the road. “I borrowed a phone from a person passing by and called up my father,” he said, adding that both his sister and mother had suffered head injuries. They were rushed to the Moga Civil Hospital, where the girl was declared dead.

“They were touching my daughter on her chest, on her hands… She was crying for help. I tried to help and asked the driver to stop them. Nobody listened. There were other passengers, but nobody helped. As I tried to stop them, they made obscene gestures and laughed. My daughter was being harassed continuously… they then threw us out of the bus,” said Shinder Kaur.

Her husband, Sukhdev Singh, a labourer, said he would not allow a post-mortem till the police arrested all the accused and named the driver in the FIR.

“The bus belongs to the Badals… We demand action against the bus driver. We will not perform the last rites till the driver is booked,” said the victim’s grandmother, Surjit Kaur.

According to the FIR, however, Shinder Kaur said in her statement that the scuffle with the conductor started over tickets. The bus driver, Ranjit Singh, conductor Sukhwinder Singh, helper Gurdeep Singh, and the fourth accused Amarjeet Singh have been arrested. The last three have been charged under Sections 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder) and 354 (molestation) of IPC.

“We have arrested the driver as investigations revealed that he did not stop the bus when the incident occurred,” said Moga SSP J S Khaira.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 31,2020

New Delhi, Mar 31: At least 24 people staying at Markaz building in Nizamuddin area of the national capital have tested positive for coronavirus, Delhi Health Minister Satyendar Jain on Tuesday.

"All of them are being screened. We are not certain of the number but it is estimated that 1500-1700 people had assembled at the Markaz building. 1033 people have been evacuated so far - 334 of them have been sent to the hospital and 700 sent to quarantine centre. Total 24 positive cases have been found so far," he said while speaking to reporters here.

The minister also slammed the organisers of the religious event saying that they have committed a grave crime.

"The event's organisers committed a grave crime. Disaster Act and Contagious Diseases Act was enforced in Delhi, no assembly of more than 5 people was allowed. Still, they did this. I have written to Lieutenant Governor to take strict action against them. Delhi government has given an order to file an FIR against the organisers," the Health Minister said.

Earlier, the Delhi government had said: "It has come to our knowledge that administrators of Nizammuddin Markaz violated coronavirus lockdown conditions and now several positive cases have been found. Strong action would be taken against those in charge of this establishment. Delhi government will ask the police to register an FIR against Maulana of Markaz, Nizamuddin." 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
August 6,2020

New Delhi Aug 6: In a new twist in the Vijay Mallya case, a certain document connected with the case in the Supreme Court has gone missing from the apex court files. 

A bench comprising Justices U.U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan adjourned the hearing to August 20.

It was hearing the review plea filed by Mallya against a July 14, 2017 judgment wherein he was found guilty of contempt for not paying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks despite repeated directions, although he had transferred $40 million to his children.

The bench was looking for a reply on an intervention application, which it seemed has gone missing from the case papers.Parties involved in the case sought more time to file fresh copies.

On June 19, the Supreme Court sought explanation from its registry regarding Mallya's appeal against the May 2017 conviction in the contempt case for not repaying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks not listed for the last 3 years.

A bench comprising Justices Lalit and Bhushan had asked the Registry to furnish all the details including names of the officials who had dealt with the file concerning the Review Petition for last three years.

The bench said according to the record, placed before it, the review petition was not listed before the court for last three years. "Before we deal with the submissions raised in the Review Petition, we direct the Registry to explain why the Review Petition was not listed before the concerned Court for last three years," said the bench.In May 2017, the apex court held him guilty of contempt of court for transferring $40 million to his children, and ordered him to appear on July 10 to argue on the quantum of punishment.

The bench said let the explanation be furnished within two weeks. "The Review Petition shall, thereafter, be considered on merits," it added.In 2017, the apex court passed the order on a contempt petition against Mallya by a consortium of banks led by the SBI. 

The banks claimed Mallya transferred $40 million from Daigeo to his children's accounts, and did not use this money to clear his debt. Banks cited this as violation of judicial orders.

stm88 info live rtp slot

slot auto scatter hitam

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 3,2020

New Delhi, Mar 3: Delhi's Tihar Prison authorities had made all necessary preparations for the hanging of four convicts in the Nirbhaya gangrape-and-murder case which was scheduled for Tuesday, officials said Monday.

However, on Monday evening, a city court deferred the hanging till further orders.

Postponing the execution, Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana said the hanging cannot be carried out pending disposal of Pawan Gupta's mercy plea before the President, observing any condemned convict must not meet his "Creator" with grievance against courts for not acting fairly on the opportunity to exhaust legal remedies.

"We had made all the necessary arrangements for the execution of the four convicts which was scheduled for Tuesday at 6 AM. Now, the execution has been postponed and we are waiting for the further order by the court," a senior jail official said.

The hanging of the four men -- Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Vinay Kumar Sharma (26), Akshay Kumar Singh (31) and Pawan -- who are lodged in Tihar jail, was fixed for March 3 in Tihar jail on a court order.

"We had checked the ropes. Hangman was called and dummy executions were carried out," another senior jail official said.

Barring Pawan, the other three had in the previous weeks moved curative petitions and mercy pleas which were all dismissed.

The first date of execution -- January 22 -- fixed on January 7 was postponed by the court to February 1. But on January 31, the court indefinitely postponed the hanging. On February 17, the court again issued fresh date for execution of death warrants for March 3 at 6 AM.

The court in its orders observed that the four convicts cannot be hanged since a mercy plea of one or the other convict was pending.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.