Prof scolds student for wearing shorts; next day all girls wear micro mini shorts!

[email protected] (CD Network)
April 8, 2016

Bengaluru, Apr 8: A senior professor from a prestigious institution in Bangaluru has landed in a controversy after he reprimanded one of his female students for entering classroom without dressing “properly”.

shortsProf V Nagaraj, who has nearly three decades of experience, had never expected that the girl students of the National Law School of India University would revolt against him for his comments and expose their legs in a bid to “demoralise” him.

According to reports, the professor scorned a third-year girl for wearing shorts to class on April 4. In protest against this so called “public shaming”, all girl students wore “micro mini shorts” to the professor's class the next day.

In a statement on social media on Wednesday, the students alleged that the professor shamed a female student for the clothes she wore to class. He allegedly cast aspersions on her character. The statement said the student, like many others, had worn shorts to class.

“On noticing the shorts, the said professor chastised the student before the entire class by asking her to 'dress properly'. The student was uncomfortable with the remark, as were many of us, since we do not think it is correct for a teacher to impose his/her notions about appropriate clothing upon students. The student in question, who was scolded by the said professor, thought it necessary to further discuss the matter with him and not to overlook it as another instance of moral policing. Upon approaching the teacher and raising objections regarding his statement, the student, to our dismay, was once again rebuked by the professor and was exposed to a plethora of untoward comments,” it said.

On Thursday evening, students of the batch of 2018 posted on Facebook that their action was to highlight that students had faced ridicule and harassment from the professor for the way they chose to dress.

However, Prof Nagaraj denied any wrongdoing and but said he expected decorum in students' dress sense. “Nothing like (what is described in the statement) happened. Students are making false and baseless allegations. It is for the university authorities to examine this incident. This is the first time that students have made such a statement (whereas) I have been teaching for 27 years.”

The professor also said that that there was no written dress code for students in NLSIU's rules currently but he has asked the university administration to issue clarifications about the dress code to the students, especially keeping in mind that “certain decorum” is expected from students attending lectures taken “especially by a senior faculty member”.

Comments

Satyameva jayate
 - 
Saturday, 9 Apr 2016

Please koi hamara muhalle me bhi aaye.....baarish hogaa
Dirty nangi girls ..they should go to work with sunny Leone...

Fair talker
 - 
Saturday, 9 Apr 2016

Good idea of professors.
If they want to see the girls naked, scold them

Professors can get it.

Rikaz
 - 
Saturday, 9 Apr 2016

What to wear and not to that solely defending on students discretion...nobody can interfere with their interest...that is it....if muslim students wear headscarf and abaya....that is their choice nobody should interfere with their dressing code....

Proud Women & Girls
 - 
Saturday, 9 Apr 2016

BIBLE SAYS: 1 Corinthians 11:5:6 - But every wife who prays or prophesies with her HEAD UNcovered DISHONORS her HEAD, Since it is the same as if her HEAD were Shaven. For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should CUT her hair short. But since it DISGRACEFUL for a wife to cut off her HAIR or SHAVE her HEAD, let her cover her HEAD.

VEDA SAYS : Rig veda book no 8 Hymn no 19 : When Brahma has made YOU a WOMAN, You should lower gaze and should not LOOK UP. You should put your feet together and you should not reveal what the garment and the veil conceals.

QURAN Chapter 33 V 9 : O prophet ! say to your Wives and your daughters and the women of the FAITHFUL to draw their outer garments close around themselves, that is BETTER that they will be recognized and not ANNOYED. and ALLAH is ever forgiving, Gentle.

People say they are christian, hindu & muslims... but they never follow what they say. Many people follow the MEDIA which mostly controlled by those who doesnt believe in God and Ignore what is taught in the RELIGIOUS books which is enlightened by the Prophets of GOD to MANKIND
Dont be a follower of MEDIA rather study the Scripture and be a faithful believer in GOD which will be successful.

TR
 - 
Saturday, 9 Apr 2016

What is wrong to come to college with Mini Shorts, If the girls want to show their assets free of cost for boys and men our guys welcome.

But may be the professors has seen his Daughter in that Girl, Let these Girls grow and one day Their Daughters wear this type of reveling thighs and deep necks , and some people will when they stare at them in front of their own eyes, Proud woman will become more proud.

My Dear Bharath kay Nariyo irrespective to any Religion you will not become beautiful by shedding your cloths.

Just and example for all those girls and women who want to wear revealing cloths, your are like a exposed Healthy Dish Surrounded by filthy flies around rotten flesh.

Protect your modesty, beauty is not in nudity.

Jithu
 - 
Friday, 8 Apr 2016

Why girls are fond of shorts? are they RSS workers?

Nombala
 - 
Friday, 8 Apr 2016

Sexist professor Vs sexy students.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 29,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 29: The Karnataka High Court’s division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice H P Sandesh today rejected an application that wanted Amulya Leona’s case to be transferred from Karnataka Police to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

The bench, while observing that extraordinary jurisdiction can’t be exercised for transferring the case to the NIA, asked “What is so special that investigation should be transferred to NIA?”

The court, in its previous hearing, had questioned the maintainability of the petition seeking transfer of the sedition case against Leona to the NIA.

According to the petitioner, advocate Pavana Chandra Shetty, the case is a serious matter against national integration and unity and has not been investigated properly by the police. The state police also failed to file the chargesheet within 90 days, he said, and also asked for cancellation of her bail.

The bench asked the petitioner as to how a bail, already granted to a person, can be cancelled. “Is it not the indefeasible right of the accused to be released on bail if chargesheet is not filed within stipulated time? How can you make a prayer for cancellation of bail?”  the Court asked.

The counsel for the petitioner also stated that in cases of a cognizable offence, when the chargesheet is purposely not filed within the stipulated time, the matter will have to transferred to the appropriate authority.

The court responded to his contention by asking him how could the court override law and cancel the bail. “Where is the question of cancellation of bail? Can we override the law and say that bail should be cancelled?” said the bench.

Advocate Vishal Raghu had filed the petition for transfer of Leona’s case, who was accused of raising pro-Pakistan slogans at an anti-CAA rally on February 20 at Freedom Park. The advocate had blamed the probe team for not filing a chargesheet on time and has asked the state government to approach the higher court against bail granted to Leona.

Bengaluru student Amulya Leona was charged with sedition for her actions in the presence of All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi. She was arrested by the Bengaluru police for allegedly shouting ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ slogans at an anti- CAA Protest in Bengaluru in February this year. On June 11, she was granted conditional bail by the Bengaluru civil court.

Her bail plea was earlier rejected by a Bengaluru court, after she had spent a three-month period in jail, stating that she may abscond if she is released. The sessions judge Vidhyadhar Shirahatti had also stated that if the petitioner is granted bail, she may abscond and may involve in similar offence which affects peace at large and hence her petition is liable to be rejected. The court had also noted that Amulya Leona is an influential person who may threaten and influence the witness and hamper the case in case of the prosecution and will abscond if released on bail.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 12,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 12: Mohammed Nalapad, son of Karnataka Congress MLA NA Harris, who allegedly rammed his sports car into vehicles and a kiosk, injuring 4, on Bellary road in Bengaluru on February 9, said that he was not in the car which met with the accident.

Bengaluru Joint Commissioner of Police, Traffic, Ravikante Gowda told media, "Mohammed Nalapad appeared before the investigating officer today. He was arrested following interrogation. We are collecting evidence and will file a charge sheet shortly."

Nalapad is out on bail, in connection with the matter where he had assaulted a man in a pub in Bengaluru in 2018.

"I was not in the car which met with accident. I was travelling in a Lamborghini car which was moving ahead of the car. However, I called people to rescue the victims. We took them to the hospital and paid their hospital bill," said Mohammed Nalapad.

Further, details are awaited

Also Read: MLA N A Harris’ son Nalapad, out on bail, now crashes his luxury Bentley car, injures 4

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 15,2020

Marriages will have to shed decadence as the state government, in an advisory, has restricted the number of guests to 50 and barred consumption of liquor at such events. 

The advisory was issued in anticipation that the COVID-19 lockdown will be eased in a phased manner. 

The advisory, issued by the Department of Health & Family Welfare, states that events can be held in a “suitable public place with good natural ventilation (no air condition).”

For latest updates on coronavirus outbreak, click here
All guests must have the Arogya Setu app on their phones and the contact details all marriage attendees should be maintained. 

No person from a containment zone will be allowed to attend the event, and persons aged above 65 years, pregnant women and children below 10 years are not permitted. 

Sanitizers are to be provided at the entry and at “appropriate” places. Thermal screening is a must at the entry point of the venue. The scanner should be held 3-15 cm away from a person’s forehead. “Anyone found having a fever (37.5 degree centigrade or 99.5 farenheit), cold, cough, difficulty in breathing shall not be permitted to attend the event and immediately referred to seek medical advice,” the advisory said. 

Besides prohibition on consumption of alcohol, the advisory said paan, gutka and tobacco will not be allowed. 

Face masks are compulsory and all persons should maintain a physical distance of more than one metre. The venue shall be clean and hygienic, with a prohibition on spitting in public places.

A nodal person should be identified to oversee the arrangements, the advisory said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.