Rebellion-hit JD(S) is now at BJP's mercy to win RS, Council seats

June 2, 2016

Bengaluru, Jun 2: The rebellion-hit JD(S) appears to be in dire straits as far as the elections to Rajya Sabha and the Legislative Council are concerned.

dghdkChances of mustering numbers to win the second Council seat looks tough at this point for the JD(S) following rebellion in the party. With five MLAs led by B Z Zameer Ahmed Khan threatening to switch their loyalty to the Congress, the party is left with only six surplus votes. A candidate requires a minimum of 29 votes to win a Council seat.

However, the JD(S), which has 40 MLAs, can easily win one Council seat. The party has fielded K V Narayanaswamy and S M Venkatpati as the first and the second candidates respectively. With total 44 MLAs on its side, the BJP will be left with 15 surplus votes. This has brightened the prospect of the saffron party's second candidate in the council polls. V Somanna and Lehar Singh are the first and the second candidates of the BJP respectively.

The JD(S) is not in a position to drive a hard bargain with the BJP. With talks between leaders of the two parties to reach an understanding remaining inconclusive, the BJP has begun wooing independents and other smaller parties.

The Assembly has nine independents, three MLAs of the BSR Congress, two of the KJP and one each of Sarvodaya Karnataka Paksha and Karnataka Makkala Paksha. The saffron party does not need the JD(S)' support if it gets the support of independents and smaller parties.

The elections to seven Council seats are scheduled for June 10, while the Rajya Sabha elections are scheduled for June 11. The MLAs are the voters in both the elections.

With the Independents and MLAs of smaller parties announcing their support to the ruling Congress in the Rajya Sabha polls, the JD(S) is left high and dry. The party has fielded Mangaluru-based businessman B M Farook as its candidate. It is difficult to win for the JD(S) even if the BJP gives the second preference votes, without the support of Independents or Congress.

Of the four RS seats, the Congress can easily win two. Former Union ministers Jairam Ramesh and Oscar Fernandes are its first and second candidates. The Congress has a total of 123 MLAs on its side. A candidate needs about 45 votes to win. The BJP, which has 44 MLAs, can win one seat – Union Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. The Congress, which will be left with about 33 surplus votes, is confident of ensuring victory of its third candidate– K C Ramamurthy – with the help of independents, smaller parties and JD(S) rebels.

The Congress believes that its second preference votes will ensure a smooth sail for Ramamurthy.

JD(S) leader H D Kumaraswamy said the BJP should help the JD(S) win the second Council seat as an act of reciprocation.

“We had helped the BJP win a Council seat in 2014 (D U Mallikarjun). I hope the BJP will reciprocate. We have already announced a tie-up with the BJP in the BBMP Council,” he said. Kumaraswamy said the party was waiting for the response of state BJP chief B?S?Yeddyurappa.

Comments

Kushwant Bhat
 - 
Thursday, 2 Jun 2016

Maeshwari Sister that was long back, now all looted money finished these Both Love Birds ( Kumaranna/Chaddianna) again they are planning forth coming Election to come share ruling start to loot now itself planning, these Buffoon's thought all Karnataka Public Like Our Master \Naren kotian\" absolutely wrong thinking now each and every one have become Clever, but still Master Naren !!!!!
Any way Good Luck Annannas, But Do not forget Shobakka also get her in your Team, she become MP no Income!!!!
Siddanna be careful see the Goons Planning.
Jai Hoooo Hindustan."

Rikaz
 - 
Thursday, 2 Jun 2016

How many MLAs required to put these son and father in jail?????

Maheshwari
 - 
Thursday, 2 Jun 2016

kumaraswamy looted so much of money, he should be in jail for his sins,

Rakesh
 - 
Thursday, 2 Jun 2016

this is the worst party of india, son did two marriages what it shows him as leader to each person of the country should marry twice?, leader should always be an role model to the society,

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 9,2020

Mysuru, Apr 9: The Administrative Training Institute (ATI) here was all set to impart training through online to Taluk Panchayat and the Gram Panchayat officials on tackling the deadly virus COVID-19, which was spreading like wildfire.

The Disaster Management Centre of ATI would conduct the training through Zoom application. Taluk Panchayat Executive officers and officials of the Gram Panchayats were invited to undergo training sessions.

District Vector-borne Diseases Control officer S Chidambar and World Health Organization representative Dr Sudhir Nayak would conduct sessions on handling the situation in rural region. The officials from 102 TP/GP Panchayats from 16 districts will attend the programme, on Thursday.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 17,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 17: The Karnataka State Board of AUQAF has ordered that management committees at Muslim Khabarastans, shall not refuse burial to Muslims died due to COVID-19.

"...in exercise the powers conferred under Waqf Act 1995, it is hereby ordered that management Committees/Muthawallies/Administrators responsible for the management of Muslim Khabarastans in the state of Karnataka irrespective of registered or unregistered in the Waqf, shall not refuse the burial of Muslims died due to COVID-19 pandemic," read an order from the Karnataka State Board of AUQAF on Thursday.

"They shall co-operate with all the Nodal Officers designated for this purpose regarding the decent burial. Non co-operation or refusal on the part of the management will be construed as an insult committed to the deceased. Any violation of the above order will attract the punitive provision of Indian Penal Code and removal from the management as per the provisions of the Waqf Act 1995," the order read.

It further said that the Waqf Officers, District Wakf Advisory Committees of the state, shall ensure the adherence of this order, and circulate the same to all the Khabarastan managements, registered or unregistered in the state.

"No further deliberation in this regard is solicited except compliance of the order in letter and spirit. Any dereliction in this regard will be viewed seriously," it read.

Giving a background on the issue of burial of COVID-19 deceased, the order read, "It is observed that, number of deaths are being occurred in various Districts of Karnataka, due to COVID-19 pandemic and it is reported that, some of the management committees of Khabarastan, are not cooperating to bury the dead bodies of COVID-19."

"A decent burial is a right of the dead person" as per the law of the land and the Islamic jurisprudence. It is needless to emphasize the importance of burial of Muslim dead bodies in Shariah. The dead body of a Muslim is treated with the utmost respect by the Ummah, joining in the funeral (Tadfeen), participating in the Namaz-e-Janaza and the burial are considered as Farz-e-Kifaya in Muslim law. According to the tradition of Islam, the person who participates in the funeral is entitled to Mountain sized reward (Sawaab)," the order read.

As per the order, the board, in its earlier circular had also cautioned the management of Waqf institutions and Khabarastan which were reluctant to allow the decent burial in the Khabarastan would be punished under the provisions of Indian Penal Code and the punitive provisions of the Waqf Act 1995 as well.

"The District Magistrates and the Superintendent of Police in the districts have been requested to prosecute the erring management committees who are responsible for non co-operation in this regard. Hence, the following order," it added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 21,2020

Mangaluru, May 21: The Supreme Court has awarded Rs 7.64 crore compensation to the next of kin of a man who was killed in a crash-landing of Air India Express Flight 812 from Dubai in Mangalore on May 22, 2010. The accident killed 158 out of 166 passengers on board.

The family of the 45-year-old Mahendra Kodkany, which include his wife, daughter and son, were earlier granted Rs 7.35 crore as compensation by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). This compensation will now get enhanced after adding 9 per cent interest per annum (on the amount yet to be paid), to be paid by Air India.

Kodkany was the regional director for the Middle East for a UAE-based company. The aircraft overshot the runway and went down a hillside and burst into flames.

A bench comprising Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi said: "The total amount payable on account of the aforesaid heads works out to Rs 7,64,29,437. Interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum shall be paid on the same basis as has been awarded by the NCDRC. The balance, if any, that remains due and payable to the complainants, after giving due credit for the amount which has already been paid, shall be paid within a period of two months."

The apex court noted that in a claim for compensation arising out of the death of an employee, the income has to be assessed on the basis of the entitlement of the employee. The top court said: "We are unable to accept the reasons which weighed with the NCDRC in making a deduction of AED (UAE currency) 30,000 from the total CTC. Similarly, and for the same reason, we are unable to accept the submission of Air India that the transport allowance should be excluded. The bifurcation of the salary into diverse heads may be made by the employer for a variety of reasons."

The top court observed that the deceased was evidently, a confirmed employee of his employer. "We have come to the conclusion that thirty per cent should be allowed on account of future prospects", added the court.

The top court noted that if the amount which has been paid by Air India is in excess of the payable under the present judgement, "we direct under Article 142 of the Constitution (discretionary powers) that the excess shall not be recoverable from the claimants," said the court.

Comments

A.Rahman
 - 
Friday, 22 May 2020

First of all  A Salute To Lawyer One Who Handled This Case Against Carriers Mismanagement Wrong Action.

 

Sure this is the second victory for the lawyer against arriers mismanagement.

 

Over all it is the sign  of a profesional ; qualified  eligble  lawyers efforts and right decision from a capable knowlegable judge. Suit case operating lawyers cannot handle such specilized cases.

They lawyer may handled rest of the vicitms cases or he not. But for his siincere efforts for the past ten years delcares whatn he  is. Am personally met him and  witnessed his court appearance  hope and wish him all the best and success .

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.