Rediscover Prophet; clear misconceptions about Islam

[email protected] (MAJID HYDERI for DailyO)
January 10, 2016

In the 7th century AD, when dental hygiene was in its infancy, this man, while returning home, would ensure brushing his teeth with meswak, lest bad breath irk his family, particularly the wife and children.

hajj

Despite having thousands of followers at his beck and call, he helped in household work.

And, in an era when women were cursed, he found heaven in the many avatars of mother, daughter and wife. This was Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, blessed with qualities an ideal family man should possess, to consolidate family, as the building block of a healthy society.

Now 1,400 years on, however, Islam is a misunderstood religion as Muslims and terrorists are often considered synonymous, making victims of hate keep the popular plea ready for defence: My name is Khan and I am not a terrorist!

Leave apart the globally-dreaded faces of terror like Abu Bakr Albaghdadi, who recently claimed to be global caliph, the image of a typical head of a Muslim family is often no less scary. These ugly faces of humanity are often attributed to Islam and its prophet.

Some accusations are downright chilling, blasphemous. A basic cause of unwanted Islamophobia is that the negatives of someone bearing a Muslim name get generalised for the entire community, without ascertaining the Prophet's preaching.

Islamic lifestyle is essentially driven by three entities, the first being Quran, which Muslims believe is the word of Allah. The other two are recorded prophetic sayings, the Hadith, and Muhammad's iconic lifestyle: Sunnah. The combination of these reflect Muhammad as the perfect man in all spheres of life, including family, which is central to Islamic society.

Also read: What Indian Muslims can learn from fatwa on AR Rahman

The ladies first: Muhammad lost his mother, Aaminah, at the age of five. His first encounter with a woman was his own wife, Khadijah. At the time of marriage, he was 25 and she a 40-year-old widow.

During her life, they lived in a society that welcomed multiple marriages for men. For 25 years, though, he did not opt for another marriage, a lesson for some of his followers who immediately after the first marriage start preparations for another.

After her death, however, Muhammad married nine women. Islamic beliefs give four main reasons for these multiple marriages: first, helping widows of his companions. Second, to create family ties between him and his illustrious companions (Muhammad married the daughters of Abu Bakr and Umar, whereas Uthman and Imam Ali married his daughters. He, therefore, had family bonds with all four of the first caliphs).

The third reason was to spread the message by uniting different clans or tribes through marriage. Another major reason was to increase credibility for his family values because confirmation from multiple sources is more credible.

From teaching how to eat, sleep or respond to nature's call, Muhammad shared with his followers the minutest details even pertaining to life in the bedroom, only to keep them guided.

As husband, his love for wife Aisha was romantic, more than many love stories that have been famous throughout history. Though most such stories are fables, Muhammad's love was real and human, not angelic.

As per recorded traditions, he once said to Aisha: "I know well when you are pleased or angry with me." Aisha replied: "How do you know that?" He said, "When you are pleased with me you swear by saying 'by the God of Muhammad' but when you are angry you swear by saying 'by the God of Ibrahim'.

She said: "You are right, I don't mention your name."

Hadith also reports that Muhammad used to search for the part that touched her lips from the utensil she used in drinking. Then, he would touch the same part with his lips when he would drink. To express love, he called her by different names, such as "Aish" and "Uaish". He would recline his head in her lap.

In a male-dominated society, where Muslim husbands often find household work demeaning, Aisha reported that Muhammad used to mend his shoes, sew his clothes and work at home.

With the exception of Aisha, he married only widows and divorced women, and he shared equal time and resources with all of them. Once, another wife, Safiyah, was on a journey with him. She was late, so he received her while she was crying. Muhammad wiped her tears with his own hands and tried his utmost to calm her down.

His affection for children was equally amazing. As soon as Fatimah, his daughter, entered the room, he would stand up, hold her hands, and make her sit where he was sitting. He would ask about her health and family, express his paternal love for her.

In a society that degraded women and rejected the birth of females to the extent that they would be buried alive, Muhammad made paradise the reward of every father who conducted himself well with his daughters and was patient in their upbringing.

As children, his grandsons, Imam Hussain and Imam Hassan, would often ride on his back. Muhammad's love was such that he would not lift his head from the ground till they would themselves not get down.

About parents, Muhammad said paradise lay beneath the mother's feet whereas in Allah's will is the father's will, and in Allah's anger is the father's anger. This again is in contrast to how Muslims often abandon aged parents, to be jihadi or "caliph" of a nuclear family, when the former need them the most.

Islam is not what Muslims do but what Muhammad wanted them to do. He was neither God nor angel, but a man of mercy, as Quran reveals in Chapter 21 verse 107: We have not sent you but as Mercy unto the mankind.

Comments

Sherin
 - 
Monday, 18 Jan 2016

May peace be upon him
Naren kotian- if u wanna make muslim youths to get angry through ua comments, sorry u r utterly wrong my dear!! May allah bless u in right path ameen

naren kotian
 - 
Wednesday, 13 Jan 2016

I read nearly 2-3 times in english ... it is exactly like what ISIS is saying ... it says kill jews , attack non muslims ... keep non muslim women as slaves .. its full halal... non muslims must clearly pay jaziya ... so there is no mis conception ... it is very much clear ... no rights for women , treat women as property ... no 72 virgins for females hahaha ... what this mama ...

Farzana Ubaid
 - 
Tuesday, 12 Jan 2016

May peace be upon him :)

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 27,2020

Mumbai, Jun 27: The Bombay High Court observed that COVID-19 patients from poor and indigent sections cannot be expected to produce documentary proof to avail subsidised or free treatment while getting admitted to hospitals.

The court on Friday was hearing a plea filed by seven residents of a slum rehabilitation building in Bandra, who had been charged ₹ 12.5 lakh by K J Somaiya Hospital for COVID-19 treatment between April 11 and April 28.

The bench of Justices Ramesh Dhanuka and Madhav Jamdar directed the hospital to deposit ₹10 lakh in the court.

The petitioners had borrowed money and managed to pay ₹10 lakh out of ₹12.5 lakh that the hospital had demanded, after threatening to halt their discharge if they failed to clear the bill, counsel Vivek Shukla informed the court.

According to the plea, the petitioners were also overcharged for PPE kits and unused services.

On June 13, the court had directed the state charity commissioner to probe if the hospital had reserved 20% beds for poor and indigent patients and provided free or subsidised treatment to them.

Last week, the joint charity commissioner had informed the court that although the hospital had reserved such beds, it had treated only three poor or indigent persons since the lockdown.

It was unfathomable that the hospital that claimed to have reserved 90 beds for poor and indigent patients had treated only three such persons during the pandemic, advocate Shukla said.

He further argued that COVID-19 patients, who are in distress, cannot be expected to produce income certificate and such documents as proof.

However, senior advocate Janak Dwarkadas, who represented the hospital, said the petitioners did not belong to economically weak or indigent categories and had not produced documents to prove the same.

A person who is suffering from a disease like COVID-19 cannot be expected to produce certificates from a tehsildar or social welfare officer before seeking admission in the hospital, the bench noted and asked the hospital to deposit ₹10 lakh in court within two weeks.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 13,2020

New Delhi, Jul 13: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has blocked Bharti Airtel's Platinum and Vodafone Idea's RedX premium plans that offer faster data speeds and priority services to customers as both the plans were violating net neutrality norms.

The telecom watchdog has asked Bharti Airtel to explain within seven days how such a similar plan being launched does not violate the rules of net neutrality.

Vodafone Idea's RedX plan has been in the market since November 2019. They made some modifications in May 2020 and the Bharti Airtel was soon going to launch a similar plan.

According to TRAI, the higher speed for premium customers discriminate against others and violates net neutrality.

Responding to TRAI's move, Airtel spokesperson said: "We are passionate about delivering the best network and service experience to all our customers. This is why we have a relentless obsession to eliminate faults and have been consistently recognised by international agencies as the best network in terms of speed, latency and video experience."

"At the same time, we want to keep raising the bar for our post-paid customers in terms of service and responsiveness. This is an ongoing effort at our end," the spokesperson said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 5,2020

With the scrapping of Mitron and Remove China Apps from its Play Store gaining a lot of attention in India, Google on Thursday said that it removed a video app "for a number of technical policy violations", while adding that it also does not allow an app that "encourages or incentivizes users into removing or disabling third-party apps".

Both the apps became immensely popular in India within a short span of time due to the prevailing anti-China sentiment amid border tensions between India and China in Ladakh and calls by Indian activists to boycott Chinese products.

Reports suggested that the Mitron app is a repackaged version of TicTic, which is a TikTok clone.

The Remove China Apps was designed to help users identify applications of Chinese origin.

Without naming the apps, Google hinted that the Mitron app may make a comeback on the Play Store once it fixes some technical issues, but the chances of the Remove China Apps are thin.

"We have an established process of working with developers to help them fix issues and resubmit their apps. We've given this developer (of the video app) some guidance and once they've addressed the issue the app can go back up on Play," Sameer Samat, Vice President, Android and Google Play, said in a statement.

Google said that its Android app store was designed to provide a safe and secure experience for the consumers while also giving developers the platform and tools they need to build sustainable businesses.

Samat said that Google Play recently suspended a number of apps for violating the policy that it does not allow an app that "encourages or incentivizes users into removing or disabling third-party apps or modifying device settings or features unless it is part of a verifiable security service".

"This is a longstanding rule designed to ensure a healthy, competitive environment where developers can succeed based upon design and innovation. When apps are allowed to specifically target other apps, it can lead to behaviour that we believe is not in the best interest of our community of developers and consumers," Samat said.

"We've enforced this policy against other apps in many countries consistently in the past - just as we did here," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.