Saffron groups slam Karnataka govt's move to set up Bababudangiri panel

[email protected] (CD Network)
June 4, 2017

Chikkamagaluru, Jun 4: The Sangh Parivar has strongly opposed the Congress government's decision to set up a 3-member committee to examine the Bababudangiri-Datta Peetha controversy. The BJP and other saffron groups have charged the state government with adopting dilatory tactics to keep the controversy alive for political gain.peeta

The government recently said a committee headed by a retired high court judge and comprising two non-officio members would look into title claims over the shrine located in a cave atop Bababudangiri hills in Chikkamagaluru district.

The government attributed the move to the Supreme Court's (SC) directive on finding an amicable solution to the controversy, which has turned into a communal tinderbox in recent years. While the Hindus want the shrine to be declared a Hindu place of worship, the hereditary administrator of the place, Syed Ghouse Mohiuddin Shah Khadri, has opposed it. On March 27, the SC gave the state government six weeks to find a solution, and that deadline ended on May 9.

It was in this backdrop that law minister T B Jayachandra announced the committee and said: "The views of both parties will be heard before the recommendations are made to the government."

But the BJP said the government's move is eyewash. The party's Sringeri MLA D N Jeevraraj said: "Setting up another committee is nothing but a political strategy to create rift among Hindus and Muslims with an eye on the elections. Instead of putting an end to the dispute, the government has taken the issue back to square one."

Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) sources said: "The Congress doesn't want to antagonize any community in the run-up to the polls."

BJP state general secretary and Chikkamagaluru MLA C T Ravi said: "The Siddaramaiah government has adopted former Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao's strategy of putting controversial issues on the backburner by setting up a committee."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
July 26,2020

Belthangady, Jul 26: The forest department officials on Sunday banned traffic in Charmadi ghat section as a precautionary measure following information that landslide and uprooting of trees may take place due to heavy rain which has been lashing the ghat section since last one week.

The officials said that a tree was likely to be uprooted in the 6th and 7th cross of the ghat section therefore the entry of vehicles were banned and this has resulted in a traffic jam.

It is said that despite lockdown many vehicles have been playing in the Ghat section.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 20,2020

Bengaluru, Jun 20: A petition has been filed in Karnataka High Court to transfer Amulya Leona case to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). She raised pro-Pakistan slogans at an anti-CAA rally on February 20 at Freedom Park.

The petition, filed by advocate Vishal Raghu, blamed the probe team for not filing chargesheet on time and suggested the state government to approach the higher court against bail granted to Amulya Leona.

On June 11, she was granted conditional bail by the Bengaluru civil court.

She was charged with sedition for her actions in the presence of All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi.

The court granted bail after hearing the bail application. Amulya's advocate on behalf of the petitioner said, "the petitioner is just a 19-year-old lady and she is studying in a private college in the Bengaluru. She shouted 'Pakistan Zindabad' but she never mentioned Pakistan as her country."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 19,2020

New Delhi, Jan 19: Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal on Sunday asserted that every state assembly has the constitutional right to pass a resolution and seek the amended Citizenship Act's withdrawal, but if the law is declared constitutional by the Supreme Court then it will be problematic to oppose it.

His remarks came a day after he had said there is no way a state can deny the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) when it is already passed by the Parliament.

"I believe the CAA is unconstitutional. Every State Assembly has the constitutional right to pass a resolution and seek its withdrawal. When and if the law is declared to be constitutional by the Supreme Court then it will be problematic to oppose it. The fight must go on!" Sibal said in a tweet.

His remarks on the CAA at the Kerala Literature Festival (KLF) on Saturday had caused a flutter as several non-BJP governments, including Kerala, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Maharashtra, have voiced their disagreement with the CAA as well as National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR).

"If the CAA is passed no state can say 'I will not implement it'. It is not possible and is unconstitutional. You can oppose it, you can pass a resolution in the Assembly and ask the central government to withdraw it.

"But constitutionally saying that I won't implement, it is going to be problematic and going to create more difficulties," said the former minister of law and justice.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.