Saudi Arabia withdraws diplomat accused in rape case

September 17, 2015

New Delhi: Sep 17: Saudi Arabia has withdrawn its diplomat, who has been accused of raping two women from Nepal at his residence in Gurgaon near New Delhi.

saudiindiaThe Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi late on Wednesday confirmed that the diplomat had left India. “We learn that Saudi embassy First Secretary, Mr Majed Hassan Ashoor, who is allegedly accused of abusing two Nepali maids, has left India,” Vikas Swarup, official spokesperson of the MEA, said in a statement.

Though the MEA did not clarify the circumstances leading to the diplomat’s departure from India, it is understood that Riyadh opted to withdraw him after New Delhi nudged it to do so.

“The First Secretary being a diplomat is governed by the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations,” Swarup added in his statement on Wednesday.

Ashoor enjoyed immunity from any criminal investigation or arrest in India in accordance with Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961.

New Delhi had clearly conveyed to Riyadh that it should either waive the immunity of Ashoor to allow Haryana Police to question him in connection with the case, or he should be withdrawn.

With Saudi Arabia not ready to waive the immunity of the diplomat, his withdrawal was the only way out for New Delhi and Riyadh to make it sure that the incident does not strain bilateral ties, particularly ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s proposed visit to the kingdom later this year.

Deccan Herald had reported on September 10 that Saudi Arabia might withdraw the diplomat.

The women, who hailed from Morang and Banglung district of Nepal, were rescued by police during a raid in the fifth floor flat the Ambience Island Caitriona apartment in Gurgaon early last week.

The women lodged a First Information Report (FIR) at DLF Phase II police station in Gurgaon, alleging that they were kept confined and raped frequently. They later told media-persons that not only the residents of the flat raped and tortured them and forced them into “unnatural sex”, but guests of the family had also sexually assaulted them on several occasions.

The women did not name the alleged perpetrators in their statements to police and the judicial magistrate. The cops, however, found that the flat was being used by Ashoor as residence.

The diplomat and his family enjoyed immunity from any criminal investigation or arrest in India in accordance with Article 31 and Article 37 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961. Saudi Arabia, however, could have waived the immunity under Article 32 of the convention.

Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador Saud Bin Mohammed A Al Sati met Thanglura Darlong, Joint Secretary in the Gulf Division of the MEA, and lodged a protest over police raid into the residence of the diplomat, alleging that it was in violation of diplomatic norms.

Police, however, claimed that they were not aware of the identity of the residents of the flat, when they had conducted the raid following a complaint by a non-profit organisation.

Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to India, was also called in to the MEA headquarters at the Jawaharlal Nehru Bhavan on September 10 and had a meeting with Joint Secretary (Protocol) Jaideep Majumdar.

Majumdar conveyed to Al Sati the request of Haryana Police for cooperation in the investigation, by waiving the diplomatic immunity of Ashoor and making him available for questioning.

With Riyadh not ready to accept the request, his withdrawal from New Delhi was the only way out.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
May 27,2020

New Delhi, May 27: The government has further extended the deadline for bidding to buy its entire 52.98 per cent stake in the country's second-biggest oil refiner, Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd (BPCL), by over one-and-a-half months to July 31.

This is the second extension for submission of expression of interest (EoI) for BPCL stake by interested bidders. The government had first invited bids showing interest in buying its stake, by May 2. It was then extended till June 13.

This has now been extended to 5 p.m. on July 31 in "view of further requests received from the interested bidders and the prevailing situation arising out of COVID-19", an official notice put up by disinvestment department DIPAM late on Tuesday said.

Accordingly, the last date for submission of written queries or preliminary information memorandum has been pushed back to June 23 from the earlier deadline of May 16.

The disinvestment in BPCL involves the government selling its entire 52.98 per cent stake in the company to a strategic investor with transfer of management control. The government has barred PSUs from bidding for BPCL and expects private sector Indian players and global MNCs to bid for its stake. The government's stake in BPCL is worth around Rs 50,000 crore.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 16,2020

New Delhi, Jan 16: The Arvind Kejriwal-led Delhi government on Thursday rejected the mercy plea of Mukesh, one of the convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya case.

The mercy plea was then forwarded to Lieutenant Governor, who has now sent it to Union Ministry of Home Affairs.

The convicts were sentenced to death for raping a 23-year-old woman in a moving bus in the national capital on the intervening night of December 16-17, 2012.

The victim, who was later given the name Nirbhaya, had succumbed to injuries at a hospital in Singapore where she had been airlifted for medical treatment.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 20,2020

New Delhi, Mar 20: The four men convicted of the gang rape and murder of a Delhi woman on December 16, 2012 were hanged in the darkness of pre-dawn on Friday, ending a horrific chapter in India's long history of sexual assault that had seared the nation's soul. Mukesh Singh (32), Pawan Gupta (25), Vinay Sharma (26) and Akshay Kumar Singh (31) were executed at 5.30 am for the savage assault in an empty moving bus on the 23-year-old physiotherapy intern who came to be known the world over as Nirbhaya, the fearless one.

This is the first time that four men have been hanged together in Tihar Jail, South Asia's largest prison complex that houses more than 16,000 inmates. The executions were carried out after the men exhausted every possible legal avenue to escape the gallows. Their desperate attempts only postponed the inevitable by less than two months after the first date of execution was set for January 22.

They were hanged at 5.30 am, Director General of Prison Sandeep Goel said.

After raping and brutalising the woman, the men, one of whom was a juvenile at the time, dumped her on the road and left for dead on the cold winter night. Her friend who was with her was also severely beaten and thrown out along with her. She was so severely violated that her insides were spilling out when she was taken to hospital. She died in a Singapore hospital after battling for her life for a fortnight.

Six people, including the four convicts and the juvenile, were named as accused.

While Ram Singh allegedly committed suicide in the Tihar Jail days after the trial began in the case, the juvenile was released in 2015 after spending three years in a correctional home.

The road to the gallows was a long and circuitous one, going through the lower courts, the High Court, the Supreme Court and the president's office before going back to the Supreme Court that heard and rejected various curative petitions.

The death warrants were deferred by a court thrice on the grounds that the convicts had not exhausted all their legal remedies and that the mercy petition of one or the other was before the president.

On March 5, a trial court issued fresh death warrants for March 20 at 5.30 am as the final date for the execution.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.