SC bouncer ousts N Srinivasan; IPL doubtful, BCCI in a shambles

March 26, 2014

N_SrinivasanNew Delhi, Mar 26: Expressing shock over the revelations in the report submitted by the justice Mukul Mudgal committee in a “sealed envelope”, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked BCCI president N Srinivasan to step down to ensure a fair investigation into the IPL corruption saga.

A bench of justices AN Patnaik and FM Ibrahim Kalifulla fumed at senior counsel Ariama Sundaram, who also counts Subrata Roy Sahara among his clients. “You ask Mr Srinivasan to step down, otherwise we will give our verdict asking him to step down,” the bench said.

The judges, who made their way into the jam-packed courtroom at 10:30am, expressed anguish over Srinivasan’s refusal to give up his position. More so after his son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan was found to be involved in betting-related activities during his time as team principal of IPL franchise Chennai Super Kings, owned by Srinivasan’s company, India Cements Ltd.

“Why are you (Srinivasan) still there? Why don’t you step down? It is so nauseating,” the bench fumed. It also rejected all arguments of the BCCI, including Srinivasan’s decision to appoint a committee to look into the IPL fiasco. The bench dismissed Sundaram’s submission that the Supreme Court-appointed panel (Mukul Mudgal committee) enjoyed all the benefits, including the right to record the statement of police officials. Conversely, the BCCI-appointed panel, which comprised two retired judges, did not have these benefits at the time of primary investigation. For the record, the BCCI-appointed committee had given Meiyappan a clean chit.

What must be hitting Srinivasan harder is that three out of five vice-presidents in the cricket board are now raising their voices against him.

Shivlal Yadav, Ravi Savant and Chitrak Mitra have all said that Srinivasan must abide by what the Supreme Court says.

So what next for Srinivasan?

As of now, the BCCI has not called for any meeting. Srinivasan is tight-lipped, secretary Sanjay Patel has cut short his Asian Cricket Council meeting and rushed back to Chennai and IPL chairman Ranjib Biswal has left for the UAE where the first leg of IPL 7 will be staged.

“We have 48 hours. Srinivasan may resign on Wednesday,” an insider said. In fact, senior BCCI officials did not hesitate to toe the Supreme Court’s line on Tuesday. “The BCCI must abide by the observation,” said Yadav, vice president (South Zone). In fact, Yadav is tipped to take over as interim president.

Also, this could well be the end of Srinivasan’s dream of taking over as chairman of the International Cricket Council, which underwent administrative and financial “reforms” recently. Srinivasan joined hands with Cricket Australia and the England and Wales Cricket Board to form ‘The Big Three’, which would effectively run world cricket.

“This is a domestic matter of the BCCI and the ICC has no comment to offer at this stage,” ICC media manager Sami-ul-Hasan said. ICC CEO Dave Richardson, who had expressed delight over the BCCI’s decision to host the IPL in the UAE, made no official comment on Tuesday.

Secretary of Cricket Association of Bihar (CAB) Aditya Verma, on whose pursuance the matter has reached where it is now, told dna that “there is no escape route left for Srinivasan”.

“I was confident that the honourable court will open the sealed envelope today. And with this, there is no way that Srinivasan can escape now. Not just he, but his team CSK and other corrupt teams should be scrapped from the IPL. Our stand has been vindicated and people should understand that cricket is being damaged by these corrupt administrators for their personal use,” said Verma.

IPL in jeopardy

A BCCI office-bearer who is also associated with the IPL governing body said the IPL Season VII this year could be given a miss in order to clear the muck. What’s worse is that franchises Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals can be terminated.

Way ahead for Srini

He is likely to quit today. With board members voicing their dissent, he may find it difficult to claw back to the top of Indian cricket board again. “If he doesn’t step down, it will be our responsibility to save the game of cricket from further embarrassment,” an official said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 6,2020

New Delhi, Jun 6: Former West Indies pacer Michael Holding has come out in support of MS Dhoni, saying that the wicket-keeper batsman indeed wanted to win the match against England in the 2019 World Cup.

India's performance in the World Cup match against England last year has once again become a matter of debate as all-rounder Ben Stokes in his book titled 'On Fire' questioned the intent of the Indian side.

Stokes also said that Dhoni's intent was questionable as he did not go for big shots when India still had a chance to win the match.

However, Holding said that nowadays people tend to write anything in their books.

"Well, people will write anything in books these days, because people are a lot more free with their opinions and when they are writing books, they need to be making headlines at times," Holding said on his official YouTube channel.

"But, to be honest, a lot of people watching that game perhaps wouldn't have arrived to the same conclusion that Ben Stokes arrived at that India were not trying to win," he added.

Holding did say that it seemed like that India did not have the same intensity as they would have had if the match was a do-or-die match.

"It was not the game that India had to win, but I don't think anyone can say that was a team tactic to lose the game. I watched that game and it appeared to me as if India weren't putting up their 100 per cent, but I realised it was not the case when the expression on MS Dhoni's face told me that he desperately wanted to win, so I do not think it was a team decision to not try to win," the former Windies pacer said.

"But I don't think they went with the same intensity of wanting to win the game, say, if it was a do-or-die situation. If it was, we would have seen a different game," he added.

On his official YouTube channel, Holding also said that no team goes in with a set pattern in terms of chasing targets.

In the round-robin stage match against England in Birmingham, India failed to chase down the massive target of 338 and fell short by 31 runs.

That was the only game that India lost in the premier tournament last year before the semifinal loss against the Kiwis.

India's chasing approach, in particular of wicket-keeper batsman Dhoni, was criticised by many, including the fans at home.

As soon as Stokes mentioned Dhoni's lack of intent in his book 'On Fire', Pakistan fans started saying that India deliberately lost the match to knock out their neighbours.

However, Stokes clarified that he never said India lost deliberately and some people were twisting his words.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 29,2020

Hamilton, Jan 29: India defeated New Zealand in the third T20 International via Super Over to take an unassailable 3-0 lead in the five-match series here on Wednesday.

India posted a competitive 179 for five at Seddon Park after being sent into bat. Opener Rohit Sharma top scored for India with a 65-run knock while skipper Virat Kohli contributed 38 runs in team's total.

Later, skipper Kane Williamson smashed a 48-ball 95 but New Zealand faltered in the final over to take the match into the Super Over.

Needing nine runs of the last over, New Zealand lost Williamson and Ross Taylor to finish at 179 for six and tie the match.

In the Super Over, New Zealand scored 17, a target which India overwhelmed in the final ball with Rohit smashing Tim Southee for two consecutive sixes.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 11,2020

Mt. Maunganui (New Zealand), Feb 11: KL Rahul struck a combative 112 but New Zealand completed a 3-0 whitewash of India by winning the third ODI by five wickets, here on Tuesday.

Rahul helped India recover from a shaky start to post a challenging 296 for 7 but the Kiwis overhauled the target with 17 balls to spare.

This is the first whitewash that India has suffered in an ODI series in more than a decade.

Sent in to bat, India were down 62 for 3 in the 13th over after the dismissals of Mayank Agarwal (1), captain Virat Kohli (9) and Prithvi Shaw (40) but Rahul got a useful ally in in-form Shreyas Iyer (62) to take India to a competitive total.

Rahul, who hit nine fours and two sixes during his 113-ball innings, and Iyer stitched exactly 100 runs from 18.2 overs for the fourth wicket to revive the Indian innings.

After the end of the promising innings of Iyer, Rahul shared another 107 runs for the fifth wicket with Manish Pandey (42).

The Kiwis were off to a confident start in their chase with Martin Guptill (66) and Henry Nicholls (80) and putting on a 106-run stand. However, wrist spinner Yuzvendra Chahal took three wickets to bring India back in the game.

Colin de Grandhomme (58) and Tom Latham (32), though, took their side past the finish line with an unbeaten 80-run partnership.

Brief Scores:

India: 296 for 7 in 50 overs (KL Rahul 112, Shreyas Iyer 62; Hamish Bennett 4/64).

New Zealand: 300 for 5 in 47.1 overs. (H Nicholls 80, M Guptill 66; Y Chahal 3/47).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.