New Delhi, Jul 19: The Supreme Court on Thursday termed as impossible the condition of observing abstinence for 41 days before undertaking a pilgrimage to the Sabarimala temple in Kerala and said this had led to the ban on the entry of women in the age group of 10 to 50 years into it.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, which is hearing petitions challenging the ban, said it is the devotion which makes a woman to visit a temple.
The observations by the bench came when senior advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for Devaswom Board which runs the over 800-year-old Lord Ayyappa temple, said it is only shrine in the world which observes the belief that women in the menstruating age should not be allowed inside it.
The senior lawyer submitted that people from all castes and religions can visit the temple and only women in that particular age group are not allowed into it because of the simple reason that it is impossible to observe abstinence for 41 days before undertaking the pilgrimage.
"This is imposition of an impossible condition that one has to observe a 41-day abstinence period. What you cannot do in law is being done by imposing this condition," the bench, also comprising justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, said.
At the outset, senior advocate Raju Ramachandran, who is assisting the court as amicus curiae, said the exclusion of women in that particular age group was akin to untouchability which was prohibited under Article 17 of the Constitution.
"We are talking about the exclusion on the basis that menstruating women are impure. I seek expansion of Article 17 of the Constitution," he said.
The Kerala government, meanwhile, told the court that it supported the entry of women of all age groups into the Sabarimala temple.
The arguments in the matter remained inconclusive and would resume on July 24.
The apex court had yesterday observed that the fundamental right of freedom to practice religion is provided to "all persons" by the Constitution and the women have the right to enter and pray like men at the shrine.
The bench had also termed as "absurd" the notification of Devaswom board banning entry of women in the 10-50 age group.
The plea challenging the ban has been filed by petitioners Indian Young Lawyers Association and others.
The apex court had on October 13 last year referred the issue to a Constitution bench after framing five "significant" questions including whether the practice of banning entry of women of that particular age group into the temple amounted to discrimination and violated their fundamental rights under the Constitution.
New Delhi, Feb 4: Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, on Tuesday attacked the BJP over Anantkumar Hegde's controversial remark on Mahatma Gandhi and termed the party as "Ravan ke aulad" (children of Ravana). "Aaj ye Mahatma Gandhi ko gaali dete hain. Ye Ravan ke aulad hain. Ram ke pujari ka ye apmaan kar rahe hain (Today, they abuse Mahatma Gandhi. They are children of Ravan. They are insulting Lord Ram's devotee)," Chowdhury said.
Comments
Add new comment