Shah Rukh Khan I-T notice; asked to spell out offshore investments

July 25, 2016

Mumbai, Jul 25: Amid New Delhi's high-pitched hunt for hidden assets of the rich and famous, actor Shah Rukh Khan has received a notice from the income-tax department. About a fortnight ago, the tax office asked Khan to spell out details of his investments in offshore destinations.

srkThe tax office sought details of Khan's investments in destinations such as Bermuda, British Virgin Islands (BVI) and Dubai. While tax authorities are sitting on a mountain of information on offshore investments by a large number of Indians, it is unclear whether the department has any prima facie evidence to believe that Khan's overseas assets reflect his undisclosed wealth.

The notice was sent under Section 131 of the Income-Tax Act, which empowers tax authorities to conduct enquiries, a person aware of the development told ET. The department, it appears, is going beyond the actor's disclosed ownership of shares of companies in tax havens to fish out information such as activities of these outfits, the decision-makers, directors, etc. ET's email to Karuna Badwal, Khan's business manager and co-producer at Red Chillies Entertainment, went unanswered till the time of going to press.

According to industry sources, besides Khan, a few industrialists who have structured investments through Singapore have received similar notices. It happens at a time the government — driven by its promise to unearth black money — is going after many wealthy Indians who did not declare overseas bank accounts and assets such as properties and stocks in the quasiamnesty scheme last year. The notices to celebrities (like Khan) may be aimed at reminding the rich that they should come clean under the ongoing Income Declaration Scheme (IDS), which is being aggressively marketed by the finance ministry as an opportunity to declare undisclosed local assets.

Efforts to make a ID's a success

"The government is making all efforts to make IDS a success. Notices are being issued to assessees to send the message that the government is serious and those who once again refuse to declare concealed income would face the music," said senior chartered accountant Dilip Lakhani.

According to Mitil Chokshi, senior managing partner at audit firm Chokshi & Chokshi LLP, "There's no doubt that those assessees who have been issued notices or subjected to investigation cannot opt for IDS. But such actions — like prosecution initiated against many assessees, charges slapped on many professionals for aiding and abetting, and information obtained from other jurisdictions — would make assessees think twice before evading tax. It would surely go to make many new assessees." Neither Lakhani nor Chokshi is an adviser to Khan.

Many businessmen, top-notch professionals and actors have used the liberalised remittance scheme of the Reserve Bank of India to buy apartments and stocks abroad. Many, in order to escape estate duty, bought into shell companies in Jersey to invest in London's property market. The scheme allows investment in almost all markets barring countries such as Mauritius, Iran and Afghanistan. Some businessmen have used their companies in India to invest abroad as rules allow a local company to invest up to 400% of its net worth in an overseas joint venture or wholly owned subsidiary.

"A lot depends on how investments are structured. A professional in showbiz who parks a slice of his earnings from overseas shows in an offshore account may appear to be violating the law. But if he organises his business smartly — by giving the rights of organising such shows to a firm in BVI or Dubai and hires directors who execute the decisions — he may still be within the tax rules. He is liable to pay tax only if he receives dividend from such overseas companies he has floated," said a person who provides such advice.

A few years ago, taxpayers were told to share information of overseas investments in their tax returns. "But even if one shares such information, the tax department would not know the nature of the company and its structure. Now, they are trying to find out more. But there's very little the department can do if the investments are legal," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 12,2020

Chennai, Mar 12: Superstar Rajinikanth on Thursday clarified that he never aspired to become the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and said his plans for politics include different heads for his prospective party and a possible government headed by it.

In his first official press conference since December 31, 2017, when he announced to take the political plunge, the veteran star also said he planned to appoint as CM, an educated youth who was compassionate and had self-respect.

With a two-leadership system for party and the government, the former would act as an "opposition" to highlight issues and would not even hesitate to "remove", apparently the head of the government, if it fails to perform, he said.

His prospective party would focus on including a substantial amount of youngsters in the age group of below 45 years while the rest would comprise retired judges and IAS and IPS officials among others.

"I myself would reach out to them and invite them," to join him, the 69-year-old actor said.

Contrary to expectations, he however, did not make a concrete statement on floating his party but called for an "uprising" by youth, after which he would make his formal political entry.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 16,2020

Washington D.C., Jan 16: Barbara Broccoli, who has since long been the producer of the James Bond franchise, recently clarified in an interview that the 007 character won't be played by a woman in the forthcoming rendition.

Broccoli, accompanied by her half brother and fellow producer Michael G. Wilson, told Variety: "He can be of any color, but he is male."

She went on to say: "I believe we should be creating new characters for women -- strong female characters. I'm not particularly interested in taking a male character and having a woman play it. I think women are far more interesting than that."

According to Fox News, the current Bond hero, Daniel Craig, announced last November that he would cease to play the legendary character once he is done with the upcoming 'No Time To Die' movie that is scheduled for release in coming April.

Commenting on Daniel parting ways with the franchise, Broccoli said: "I'm in total denial. I've accepted what Daniel has said, but I'm still in denial. It's too traumatic for me."

Fox News reported last July that the British Actress Lashana Lynch could possibly star in the 2020 Bond flick, but such speculations were dispelled once the trailer for the movie was brought out last December.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 9,2020

Mumbai, Jan 9: A day after Deepika Padukone visited the JNU campus to express solidarity with students who had been attacked, her film "Chhapaak" made another splash on Wednesday over the name of its antagonist.

While Deepika was the focus of many a discussion on social media and beyond for showing up at a public meeting in the university, the film, based on the life of acid attack survivor Laxmi Agarwal, was also making news for quite another reason.

In what could well be a storm in a 'Twitter cup', "Nadeem Khan" and "Rajesh" began trending on the microblogging site after a magazine article claimed the name of the antagonist had been changed. By 4 pm, 'Nadeem Khan' clocked close to 60,000 tweets and 'Rajesh' close behind with 50,000.

In 2005, Laxmi was disfigured for life when a man called Nadeem Khan and three others allegedly hurled acid at her in Delhi's upscale Khan Market.

In the film based on her life, the narrative remains the same but the names have been changed. So, Laxmi is 'Malti' Agarwal and Nadeem becomes 'Babboo' aka 'Bashir Khan'.

On Wednesday, Swarajya magazine wrote an article headlined, "The Ways Of Bollywood: In Deepika Padukone-Starer Chhapaak, Acid Attacker Naeem Khan Becomes ‘Rajesh'." "As part of a backlash against Padukone's JNU 'meet and greet', social media users researched the names of the characters involved in the movie Chhapaak and conspicuously found the name of main perpetrator Naeem Khan absent," the article alleged.

But in the Meghna Gulzar directed film, there is no mention of any Nadeem or Naeem Khan. Moreover, Rajesh is the name of Malti's boyfriend.

Minister of State for Environment, Forest and Climate Change Babul Supriyo jumped into the controversy, saying it was another example of "absolute hypocrisy".

"...When you say all characters are fictitious and don't have any resemblance with living beings and all of that, this is absolute hypocrisy. When you change the name which also changes the religion, it has been done very deliberately," Supriyo told a TV channel when asked to comment on the controversy.

South Delhi BJP MP Ramesh Biduri also called for a boycott of the movie.

With Deepika grabbing attention by going to JNU, many appreciated her 'silent solidarity' but others criticised her for "supporting the Leftists" and said it was a promotional stunt ahead of the release.

"#BoycottChhapaak" was trending on Twitter as was "#ISupportDeepika".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.