Stay out: People’s message Union Minister who ‘adopted’ their village

Agencies
April 4, 2019

Noida, Apr 4: He adopted their village, represents them in the Lok Sabha after they broke tradition to vote for him, but Union minister Mahesh Sharma is now strictly persona non grata in Kachera with slogans and posters making it abundantly clear he’s not welcome any more.

The protests, which started following a standoff with a realty group and spilled into anguish over the lack of development in their area, have been going for the last six months come rain, winter or summer and show no signs of abating.

In October 2018, violent protests in Kachera village in western Uttar Pradesh's Gautam Buddh Nagar area bordering the national capital led to 86 locals being arrested after a standoff with a realty group.

The resentment still burns, deep and strong.

The demonstrations since have been constant with about two dozen men and women, young and old, intermittently raising slogans against their Lok Sabha MP.

A poster declaring “Kachera Varsabad, Mahesh Sharma ke god liye gaon mein BJP walon ka aana sakhta mana hai (This is Kachera. The BJP’s people are not allowed in this village adopted by Mahesh Sharma) is hung on a wall near their protest site and similar signages are seen at various entry points of the village.

But the anger is directed primarily against Sharma, who they blame not just for the realty group reneging on its promises but also for the many ills that hinder their development.

Slogans like “Modi tujhse bair nahi, Mahesh Sharma ki khair nahi” (Modi, we are not against you, but Mahesh Sharma will not be spared)” can be heard every now and then.

In 2014, Kachera, which has around 4,500 votes, broke away from tradition in the Nagar community dominated region with 27 villages and voted for Sharma, a Brahmin.

In 2009, Surendra Nagar of the BSP was voted to the Lok Sabha from the Gautam Buddh Nagar constituency.

Faced with the continuing anger against him, Sharma said the agitation in the village was due to political reasons.

“Development has been slow there but still a lot of work has been done,” Sharma told news agency.

Locals said they had sold their land to a private developer in 2010 and were given monetary compensation. They were also promised roads, drinking water, healthcare facilities, community centres, a degree college, a sports ground and improved facilities crematorium.

However, the only thing the developer did was build concrete roads. And this, too, was improperly done with roads in the interiors of the village getting clogged during rains, said Dharampal Singh, a retired school teacher.

“For a village adopted by an MP, a lot more development could have been done. Roads have been made by the developer. The government has provided power connections, but the bill that would earlier be Rs 400 has now soared to Rs 1,000 a month,” the 70-year-old told news agency.

“Sharma ji has visited this village only once so far,” he added.

Bhupendra Nagar, 27, alleged that on October 26, 2018 the administration, in cahoots with the private developer, destroyed standing crops, When the locals resisted, they were beaten and 86 of them arrested.

“That day, some people from the village reached out to Mahesh Sharma ji apprising him of the situation and he assured getting them released in a day… Our people were in jail for 13 days,” he said.

The villagers said they are still hurting from that injustice.

Narendra Nagar, 22, and Rakam Singh, 55, who were among those jailed said a wrong had been done and not enough was being done to right it.

“I was in jail for 13 days for no wrong and released only after furnishing a bond,” said an angry Narendra Nagar.

Those arrested were released late in the intervening night of November 7 and 8. It was Diwali and diyas were lit only when they returned home around 2 am.

Among those arrested were at least three local BJP workers who have now severed ties with the party.

“I was beaten up and jailed for speaking up for fellow villagers whose crops were being destroyed. I told the policemen that we are BJP workers, but they said nobody would be spared,” claimed Kuldeep Nagar, 28, a former ABVP leader.

According to Sharma, the protests are not against him but against the state government and the administration.

“The people are not against the village being adopted, they are against state government and administration over compensation. They are not against me. I have tried to tell them that work is being done. The ills are a carry forward from the previous governments and being resolved,” the MP said.

An aide added Sharma has been to 32 countries and been on a whirlwind tour of the country as Union culture minister and expecting him to reach all 1,186 villages in the constituency was unfair.

According to District Magistrate Brajesh Narain Singh, farmers sold their land through a sale deed directly to the developer under a PPP scheme in 2010 and received the price for it.

"Several rounds of discussion have taken place. Any solution has to be found out within the framework of the law," Singh said, adding that the dispute over compensation was taken to the high court and even the Supreme Court.

The villagers said their woes are virtually endless.

Employment has become a problem with private companies not recruiting any youth and cattle rearing no longer an option due to lack of fodder without any land.

“Anybody with the surname of Bhati or Nagar is sure not to get a job in these companies. Our reputation has worsened and there is no support from leaders.,” an elderly villager said.

Spread across Dadri, Jewar, Noida, Khurja and Sikandrabad assembly segments, Gautam Buddh Nagar, with nearly 23 lakh voters, goes to polls on April 11 in the first leg of the seven-phased elections.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 15,2020

New Delhi, Jul 14: India's COVID-19 tally has reached 9,36,181 as 29,429 new coronavirus cases were reported in the last 24 hours, informed the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on Wednesday.

The death toll went up to 24,309, including 582 fatalities in the last 24 hours.

Out of the total cases, 3,19,840 are currently active and 5,92,032 are cured/discharged/migrated.

As per the Ministry, Maharashtra -- the worst-affected state from the infection -- has a total of 2,67,665 COVID-19 cases and 10,695 fatalities. While Tamil Nadu has a tally of 1,47,324 cases and 2,099 deaths due to COVID-19.

Delhi has reported a total of 1,15,346 cases and 3,446 deaths due to COVID-19.

As per the information provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) 3,20,161 samples have been tested for COVID-19 till July 14, of these 1,24,12,664 samples were tested on Tuesday.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 29,2020

New Delhi, Jun 29: The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Central government to find out the facts related to blacklisting and canceling of visas of foreign nationals who attended the congregation of Tablighi Jamaat in Nizamuddin area here.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar and also comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna asked the Centre to find out the facts related to the matter and fixed it for further hearing on July 2.

The apex court asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta "if visas of these foreigners are canceled, then why are they still in India?"

"You (Centre) can deport them. If visas are not canceled, then, it is a different situation," the court said. The top court was hearing a number of petitions challenging blacklisting and cancellation of visas filed by few foreigners.

Mehta sought more time to file a reply on the matter, after which the court posted the matter for further hearing on July 2.

The petitions, filed by the foreign nationals from 35 countries, have sought directions to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to remove their names from the blacklist, reinstate their visas and facilitate their return to their respective countries.

The petitions sought to declare the decision of the MHA of blacklisting the foreign nationals who attended the Tablighi Jamaat congregation as "arbitrary".

"Unilateral blacklisting of 960 foreigners by the Home Ministry vide press release dated April 2, 2020, and the subsequent blacklisting of around 2500 foreigners as reported on June 4, 2020, is in violation of Article 21. Therefore, it is void and unconstitutional as the petitioners have neither been provided any hearing nor notice or intimation in this regard," the plea said.

One of the petitioners named Fareedah Cheema, a Thai national in the seventh month of her pregnancy, said she was quarantined in March, like other foreign nationals but was released from quarantine only in late May and is still at a facility under restricted movements, without the avenue to go back to her home nation and experience the birth of her child with security and dignity, with her loved ones.

These foreign nationals presently in India were blacklisted for a period of 10 years from traveling to India for their alleged involvement in Tablighi Jamaat activities.

The Home Ministry had said that foreign Tablighi Jamaat members, who were staying in India in violation of visa rules during the nationwide lockdown implemented to combat the COVID-19 spread, have been blacklisted.
A large congregation organised by Tablighi Jamaat in the national capital in March had emerged as a major COVID-19 hotspot in the country.

The government had said the decision of banning the foreign Tablighi Jamaat members was taken after details of foreigners found illegally living in mosques and religious places emerged from various states across the country.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 4,2020

New Delhi, Jun 4: CSIR Director-General Shekhar Mande said on Thursday that the World Health Organisation's (WHO) decision to halt hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) drug trial was taken in haste and the global body should have actually analysed the data before making the decision.

"I firmly believe that WHO decision was taken in haste it was a kind of knee jerk reaction they should have actually analyse the data on their own before temporarily suspend the trials that is my personal opinion," Mande said.

India's nodal government agency ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research) overseeing the country's response to the coronavirus pandemic last month wrote to the WHO citing differences in dosage standards between Indian and international trials that could explain the efficacy issues of HCQ in treating COVID-19 patients.

In addition, Dr Sheela Godbole, National Coordinator of the WHO-India Solidarity Trial and Head of the Division of Epidemiology, ICMR-National AIDS Research Institute also wrote a letter via an email to Dr Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist at World Health Organisation.

In a letter, Dr Godbole stated: "There was no reason to suspend the trial for safety concern," attributing it to the current RECOVERY data which differs significantly from the non-randomised assessment by Mehra et al, a scientific paper.

Referring to the letter, the CSIR head said, "We don't know what actually happened behind the scenes but the hypothesis is that because of the paper published in Lancet. It is a very well known journal and if Lancet has done due vigilance in publishing the paper. 

Therefore, the WHO thought the paper's findings are right that's why WHO hold based on what is published on Lancet. The WHO shouldn't have accepted it immediately this should have taken their own due vigilance to find out that study is right or not."

DG CSIR said because there is a global outcry it must have put pressure on both Lancet as well as WHO and both of them now retracted from their original position. "WHO has started a trial again and Lancet has put an expression of concern on their website both of these are very welcome development for science," he said.

"So I am pretty sure that Lancet would have published the reports only after seeing somewhere the drug failed to work," Mande said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.