Time for Yuvraj to take a call on his Test career

December 22, 2012
yuvaraj


Mumbai, December 22: If Yuvraj Singh has been looking for a clue about charting the remainder of his cricketing career, the first T20 against England at Pune offered it.

There was Yuvraj Singh scything through the England top order with a three-wicket burst and tearing the visitors’ bowlers apart with a powerful cameo. He was the guiding force behind India’s comfortable five-wicket victory at the Subrata Roy Sahara stadium on Thursday.

Knowing Yuvraj’s vulnerability against spin in the early stages of his innings, England captain Eoin Morgan introduced tweakers Danny Briggs and James Tredwell from both ends, only for the Punjab left-hander to milk some easy runs.

Now, replace that image with Yuvraj in flannels. You’ll find a batsman struggling to impose himself on the opposition, all at sea against top quality spin of Monty Panesar and Graeme Swann. Admittedly, Briggs and Tredwell are not quite in the same class as their seniors, but in coloured clothes Yuvraj seemed a lot more liberated. There was that sense of belongingness in his performance.

Even Yuvraj himself admitted it. “It was T20. So I played with a lot more freedom.” Yes, he has nailed the issue. Yuvraj needs that free atmosphere to express himself, and the subtleties of Test cricket demands a meticulous approach, and careful planning over multiple sessions. At times a batsman even needs to vary one’s game session by session.
Rahul Dravid had showed us that several times. Sometimes, he would go into a cage in one session, blocking ball after ball and waging an intense battle in the middle. All of a sudden he would come out of that dimly-lit boxing ring with a flurry of boundaries, upsetting the well-charted out plans of opposition. It was wonderful pacing of innings.

A batsman like Virender Sehwag would approach that in a different way, muscling the opponents down like a street bully. But then he’s an exception than a norm. It was Yuvraj’s struggling point. He never could find the patience and meticulousness of Dravid, and he couldn’t overcome the technical susceptibilities against spin, like Sehwag did early in his career against short-pitched ball, not allowing him to express himself fully. Hence, there was always that tentativeness about Yuvraj’s batting in Tests.

In that sense, Yuvraj has a predecessor -- Michael Bevan of Australia. Despite being hailed as one of the finest one-day batsman in history, Bevan never really managed to translate that potential into Test cricket. Initially, the left-hander found it hard to digest the fact that he would never make it big in the traditional format, but once that reality set in Bevan transformed himself into a wonderful finisher in 50-over cricket.

There was a time when Yuvraj would react strongly to questions regarding his fight for a place in the Test side, and let the world know of his disappointment about not cementing a place in the longer version despite a decade long attempt. Then he would have stressed on his desire to be in the pantheon of India’s Test greats, but on Thursday, there was a difference when that inevitable question about his Test career was thrown at him.

There was no fight. There was no standard “confident of coming back strongly soon” reply. There was only an air of acceptance.

“Honestly, I don’t want to reply to that question. I am quite happy that I am living, and I no longer care what format I play -- Tests, one-dayers or T20s -- as long as I play for India,” he said rather stoically.

It’s quite tough to trace the source of that detachment. It could be his triumphant battle against cancer or his failures in the recent series against England. But that awareness about his limitations and accepting it would only make him a stronger player in his pet formats.

India are due to face England in the second T20 here on Saturday, and then there are two more T20s against Pakistan, followed by one-dayers against Pakistan and England. A focused Yuvraj could be India’s biggest asset.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 26,2020

Mumbai, May 26: Former Pakistan pacer Shoaib Akhtar said that if he was playing currently he and Virat Kohli would have been the best of friends off the field, but real enemies whenever they stepped on the field.

Akhtar also said that he would have liked to challenge Kohli to drive the ball.

"Virat Kohli and I would have been the best of friends as both of us are Punjabi, but on the field, we would have been the best of the enemies. I would have loved to get inside the head of Kohli. I would have told him that you cannot play a cut or pull shot against me," Akhtar told Sanjay Manjrekar in a videocast hosted by ESPNCricinfo.

"I would have gone wide of the crease and bowled a ball that would go away from him, I would have forced him to drive the ball as it is his favourite shot. So I would keep forcing him to play the drive shot at my pace," he added.

Akhtar also said that he wishes that Kohli could have played against some of the top bowlers in the game.

The Rawalpindi Express said that Kohli would have enjoyed the challenge of facing bowlers like Wasim Akram, Shane Warne, and Waqar Younis.

"I would also keep talking to him, because if I get him to lose his focus then that would have been great. The great thing about Kohli is that he gets more focused when he is challenged. But I believe Virat Kohli would have still scored the same amount of runs if I was playing," Akhtar said.

"I really wish that he had played against Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shane Warne, and then Virat would have also enjoyed the challenge," he added.

Akhtar played 224 matches for Pakistan in international cricket and took 444 wickets across all formats.

Over the years, comparisons between Kohli and Sachin Tendulkar have been growing and many have picked the current Indian skipper to break the records set by Tendulkar.

Tendulkar called time on his career after registering 100 international centuries, while Kohli has 70 centuries across all formats.

Currently, Kohli is ranked at the top spot in the ICC ODI rankings while he is in second place in the Tests rankings.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 25,2020

Jun 25: After asserting that the 2011 World Cup final was "sold" by "certain parties" in Sri Lanka to India, the island nation's former sports minister Mahindananda Aluthgamage has now called his claim a "suspicion" that he wants investigated.

The Lankan government has ordered an enquiry into the matter and a special Police investigation unit recorded Aluthgamage's statement on Wednesday. He told the team that he was only suspicious of fixing.

"I want my suspicion investigated," Aluthgamage told reporters.

"I gave to the Police, a copy of the complaint I lodged with the International Cricket Council (ICC) on 30 October 2011 regarding the said allegation as then Sports Minister," he said.

Aluthgamage has alleged that his country "sold" the game to India, a claim that was ridiculed by former captains Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene who demanded evidence from him.

Set a target of 275, India clinched the trophy thanks to the brilliance of Gautam Gambhir (97) and then skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni (91).

"Today I am telling you that we sold the 2011 world cup, I said this when I was the sports minister," Aluthgamage, who was the sports minister at the time, had stated.

Sangakkara, the captain of Sri Lanka at that time, asked him to produce evidence for an anti-corruption probe.

"He needs to take his 'evidence' to the ICC and the Anti corruption and Security Unit so the claims can be investigated thoroughly," he tweeted.

Jayawardene, also a former captain who scored a hundred in that game, ridiculed the charge.

"Is the elections around the corner...like the circus has started...names and evidence?" he asked in a tweet.

Aluthgamage said that in his opinion no players were involved in fixing the result, "but certain parties were."

Both Aluthgamage and the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa were among the invitees at the final played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai.

Following his allegations, Aravinda de Silva, the former great who was the then chairman of selectors, has urged the BCCI to conduct its own investigation.

De Silva has said he is willing to travel to India to take part in such an investigation despite the current COVID-19 threat.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
August 3,2020

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) will not end its partnership with Chinese companies. Vivo, the Chinese smartphone maker, is the main sponsor of the new IPL season as well. Apart from Vivo, PayTM and Dream 11 will also be at the helm of the 13th edition of the IPL. The IPL governing council meeting on Sunday decided to retain the old sponsors.

As soon as the IPL GC announced the decision of retaining the sponsors, a huge number of fans took to Twitter to slam the board for the same. #BoycottIPL started trending as the users urged others to boycott the tournament for the Chinese connection.

Earlier, the demand for exclusion of Chinese companies from the IPL was strong in the wake of the India-China border dispute. But the BCCI cannot abruptly end its collaboration with them. Because of the signed contract itself. And in this age of declining economy, it is difficult to find new sponsors quickly.

The current BCCI contract with Vivo is for five years. Vivo has invested Rs 2,199 crore to become the main sponsor of the IPL. The contract was signed in 2017. However, the BCCI’s move is paving the way for new discussions as calls are mounting across the country to boycott Chinese companies.

The BCCI announced other important decisions besides retaining sponsors. The IPL will be held from September 19 to November 10. The Indian government has given permission to the BCCI to hold the IPL in the UAE. With this, all obstacles in the way of organizing the tournament were removed.

The IPL matches will be played at 7.30 pm Indian time (6 pm UAE time). Most matches are about one match a day. There are a total of ten ‘double headers’ (two matches a day) in the tournament. Franchisees are allowed to appoint as many replacements as they want in the new season in view of the new health situation. At the same time, the maximum number of players a franchise can accommodate is 24. The BCCI is also planning to host a women’s IPL tournament.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.