Time for Yuvraj to take a call on his Test career

December 22, 2012
yuvaraj


Mumbai, December 22: If Yuvraj Singh has been looking for a clue about charting the remainder of his cricketing career, the first T20 against England at Pune offered it.

There was Yuvraj Singh scything through the England top order with a three-wicket burst and tearing the visitors’ bowlers apart with a powerful cameo. He was the guiding force behind India’s comfortable five-wicket victory at the Subrata Roy Sahara stadium on Thursday.

Knowing Yuvraj’s vulnerability against spin in the early stages of his innings, England captain Eoin Morgan introduced tweakers Danny Briggs and James Tredwell from both ends, only for the Punjab left-hander to milk some easy runs.

Now, replace that image with Yuvraj in flannels. You’ll find a batsman struggling to impose himself on the opposition, all at sea against top quality spin of Monty Panesar and Graeme Swann. Admittedly, Briggs and Tredwell are not quite in the same class as their seniors, but in coloured clothes Yuvraj seemed a lot more liberated. There was that sense of belongingness in his performance.

Even Yuvraj himself admitted it. “It was T20. So I played with a lot more freedom.” Yes, he has nailed the issue. Yuvraj needs that free atmosphere to express himself, and the subtleties of Test cricket demands a meticulous approach, and careful planning over multiple sessions. At times a batsman even needs to vary one’s game session by session.
Rahul Dravid had showed us that several times. Sometimes, he would go into a cage in one session, blocking ball after ball and waging an intense battle in the middle. All of a sudden he would come out of that dimly-lit boxing ring with a flurry of boundaries, upsetting the well-charted out plans of opposition. It was wonderful pacing of innings.

A batsman like Virender Sehwag would approach that in a different way, muscling the opponents down like a street bully. But then he’s an exception than a norm. It was Yuvraj’s struggling point. He never could find the patience and meticulousness of Dravid, and he couldn’t overcome the technical susceptibilities against spin, like Sehwag did early in his career against short-pitched ball, not allowing him to express himself fully. Hence, there was always that tentativeness about Yuvraj’s batting in Tests.

In that sense, Yuvraj has a predecessor -- Michael Bevan of Australia. Despite being hailed as one of the finest one-day batsman in history, Bevan never really managed to translate that potential into Test cricket. Initially, the left-hander found it hard to digest the fact that he would never make it big in the traditional format, but once that reality set in Bevan transformed himself into a wonderful finisher in 50-over cricket.

There was a time when Yuvraj would react strongly to questions regarding his fight for a place in the Test side, and let the world know of his disappointment about not cementing a place in the longer version despite a decade long attempt. Then he would have stressed on his desire to be in the pantheon of India’s Test greats, but on Thursday, there was a difference when that inevitable question about his Test career was thrown at him.

There was no fight. There was no standard “confident of coming back strongly soon” reply. There was only an air of acceptance.

“Honestly, I don’t want to reply to that question. I am quite happy that I am living, and I no longer care what format I play -- Tests, one-dayers or T20s -- as long as I play for India,” he said rather stoically.

It’s quite tough to trace the source of that detachment. It could be his triumphant battle against cancer or his failures in the recent series against England. But that awareness about his limitations and accepting it would only make him a stronger player in his pet formats.

India are due to face England in the second T20 here on Saturday, and then there are two more T20s against Pakistan, followed by one-dayers against Pakistan and England. A focused Yuvraj could be India’s biggest asset.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 27,2020

Lahore, Apr 27: Pakistan batsman Umar Akmal has been banned from all forms of cricket for three years for failing to report spot-fixing offers, the Pakistan Cricket Board announced Monday.

Umar, who turns 30 next month, pleaded guilty to not reporting the fixing offers which led to his provisional suspension on February 20 this year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 25,2020

New Delhi, Jun 25: India spinner Ravichandran Ashwin on Thursday called the 1983 World Cup win as the 'landscape' changing moment for the game of cricket in the country.

Today, India is celebrating the completion of the 37 years of the maiden World Cup triumph under the leadership of Kapil Dev.

"Today 37 years ago, changed the cricketing landscape in India. Thank you @therealkapildev and team for making the game a career for many of us today. Deeply indebted," Ashwin tweeted.

In 1983, in the finals between India and West Indies, the latter won the toss and opted to bowl first.

The Kapil Dev-led side managed to score just 183 runs as Andy Roberts took three wickets while Malcolm Marshall, Michael Holding, and Larry Gomes picked up two wickets each.

Defending 183, India did a good job of keeping a check on the Windies run flow, reducing the side to 57/3.

Soon after, the team from the Caribbean was reduced to 76/6 and India was the favourites from there on to win the title.

Mohinder Amarnath took the final wicket of Michael Holding to give India their first-ever World Cup title win.

In the finals, West Indies was bowled out for 140, and as a result, India won the match by 43 runs.

Kapil Dev lifting the trophy at the balcony of Lord's Cricket Ground still remains an image to savour for all the Indian fans.

In the finals, Mohinder Amarnath was chosen as the Man of the Match as he scored 26 runs with the bat and also picked up three wickets with the ball.

India has been the regular participant in the World Cup from its beginning to the latest edition. The first edition was held in 1975 and from there on, it has taken place after a span of every four years.

West Indies won the first two World Cup titles (1975, 1979) and was the runner-up in 1983. India has won the title two times, in 1983 and in 2011.

MS Dhoni captained the 2011 team to win their second title after 28 years. Australia has won the tournament five times (1987, 1999, 2003, 2007, and 2015).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 6,2020

New Delhi, Jun 6: Former West Indies pacer Michael Holding has come out in support of MS Dhoni, saying that the wicket-keeper batsman indeed wanted to win the match against England in the 2019 World Cup.

India's performance in the World Cup match against England last year has once again become a matter of debate as all-rounder Ben Stokes in his book titled 'On Fire' questioned the intent of the Indian side.

Stokes also said that Dhoni's intent was questionable as he did not go for big shots when India still had a chance to win the match.

However, Holding said that nowadays people tend to write anything in their books.

"Well, people will write anything in books these days, because people are a lot more free with their opinions and when they are writing books, they need to be making headlines at times," Holding said on his official YouTube channel.

"But, to be honest, a lot of people watching that game perhaps wouldn't have arrived to the same conclusion that Ben Stokes arrived at that India were not trying to win," he added.

Holding did say that it seemed like that India did not have the same intensity as they would have had if the match was a do-or-die match.

"It was not the game that India had to win, but I don't think anyone can say that was a team tactic to lose the game. I watched that game and it appeared to me as if India weren't putting up their 100 per cent, but I realised it was not the case when the expression on MS Dhoni's face told me that he desperately wanted to win, so I do not think it was a team decision to not try to win," the former Windies pacer said.

"But I don't think they went with the same intensity of wanting to win the game, say, if it was a do-or-die situation. If it was, we would have seen a different game," he added.

On his official YouTube channel, Holding also said that no team goes in with a set pattern in terms of chasing targets.

In the round-robin stage match against England in Birmingham, India failed to chase down the massive target of 338 and fell short by 31 runs.

That was the only game that India lost in the premier tournament last year before the semifinal loss against the Kiwis.

India's chasing approach, in particular of wicket-keeper batsman Dhoni, was criticised by many, including the fans at home.

As soon as Stokes mentioned Dhoni's lack of intent in his book 'On Fire', Pakistan fans started saying that India deliberately lost the match to knock out their neighbours.

However, Stokes clarified that he never said India lost deliberately and some people were twisting his words.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.