Triple Talaq has no place in a secular country: Centre tells Supreme Court

October 8, 2016

New Delhi, Oct 8: The Centre on Friday opposed before the Supreme Court the practice of triple talaq, saying anything that is subjected to the whims of menfolk was incompatible with the principle of gender equality and justice as enshrined in the Constitution.

talaq“Gender justice and dignity of women are non-negotiable and overarching constitutional values, and can brook no compromise in a secular country like India,” the government stated. In an affidavit, the NDA government contended that triple talaq, nikah halala' (bar against remarriage with divorced husband, without an intervening marriage with another man) and polygamy cannot be regarded as an integral part of the religion.

“Even theocratic countries where Islam is a state religion have undergone reforms, so these practices cannot be regarded as integral to the religion and India being a secular republic, there is no reason to deny the women rights available under the Constitution,” the law ministry said.

Coming out in support of a batch of petitions, including one by advocate Balaji Srinivasan on behalf of Shayara Bano, the government said the issue of the validity of triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy needs to be considered in the light of principles of gender justice and overriding constitutional principles of non-discrimination, dignity and equality.

The Centre stated: “Secularism being a hallmark of Indian democracy, no part of its citizenry ought to be denied access to fundamental rights, much less can a section of secular society be worse off than its counterparts in theocratic countries, many of which have undergone reforms.”

The Centre said though polygamy was regarded progressive and path-breaking centuries ago, in light of the principle of gender justice, it required “serious reconsideration”.

Triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy cannot be regarded as essential and integral part of the religion and would therefore be not entitled to protection under Article 25 (right to practice religion) of the Constitution, it added.

Even an affidavit by the Muslim Personal Law Board has referred to those practices as “undesirable” and which cannot be elevated to essential religious practice, the government said.

“Personal laws must be examined in the light of the overarching goal of gender justice and dignity of women... Any provision of the personal law which is inconsistent with fundamental rights is void,” the government said. Can personal laws, meant to preserve diverse identity, be used as a pretext to deny women equality and status available under the Constitution, the Centre asked

Comments

shaji
 - 
Monday, 10 Oct 2016

Muslim Ulemas need to educate Ummah on Talaq issue as it is being misused and practiced incorrectly. It is not surprising that Central Govt is not accepting Shariat in the presence of advisers like MJ Akbar, Mukhtar Abbas, shanawaz, Muneer kallapally etc who have zero knowledge about islam. These people are traitors like Mir Qasim and busy in appeasing BJP high command.

Go Moothra
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Viren ......wish to become Muslim as we have a chance to marry 4 wives...... Bad luck......

but you should also know that you can marry 4 wives only if you can maintain Justice between which is almost a difficult task for Non Muslim...because we eat beef and have the strength to maintain all the daily aspects ....unlike a Fanatic Hindutva activist... who eat beef but with bear or whisky or rum

Abdulla
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Please watch this
MAJHA VISHESH : Aurangabad: Discussion on Ban Muslim Triple Talaq Law

Also this...
Br.imran Answering About Triple Talaq To a Non Muslim Sister.

And YOU judge yourself....

Kaizer
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

People doesnt know what exactly triple talaq means
Wel Said Ahmed KC
there are some rulings in triple talaq, it doesnt mean u say triple talaq and the relationship goes invalid.
Follow the exact rulings of triple talaq which will be a best solution for everyone.

Ahmed K. C.
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Muslims are taking advantage of \triple talaq\" without knowing the correct way of \"triple talaq\"
If followed in the right way, there is no better solution than this for any broken marriages."

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 15,2020

Mangaluru, Jun 15: The case of two elderly Dubai returnees who are being treated for Covid-19 at the Wenlock Covid-19 Hospital has left doctors perplexed.

The two aged 76 and 81 men had arrived from Dubai on May 18 and 12 respectively and are at the hospital since one month. 

To everyone's surprise, six of their tests have come out positive though they have not shown any symptoms of SARS-CoV-2.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 18,2020

Mangaluru, Apr 18: Mangaluru Police have registered a case against two foreign nationals, who were under home quarantine in Kodailbail, for allegedly spitting in the lift of their apartment building on Friday.

The two men, along with three of their roommates, have now been sent to a quarantine facility.

The residents of the residential complex have mentioned in their complaint that they have the CCTV footage of the two spitting in the lift.
Further investigation in the case is underway.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 4,2020

Bengaluru, Mar 4: The Karnataka High Court has issued a notice to the state government in connection with the denial of retirement benefits to a retired deputy commissioner of commercial taxes who had fought against the illegal iron ore lobby.

Justice G Narendra also directed the state to respond to the notice before March 9, stating the reasons for withholding the officer’s retirement benefits.

Advocate Ramananda, appearing for the retired officer Josephat Andrews, explained that the single-judge bench also warned the government of stringent action.

Petitioner Josephat Andrews said his retirement benefits amounting to Rs 25.88 lakh were being withheld since 2014.

In 2009, Andrews detected a huge scam involving Vijaya Leasing, a company associated with former minister Gali Janardhan Reddy. Immediately he wrote to his higher officials explaining to them how the department was owed Rs 1,400 crore in taxes by the company. Immediately after that, Andrews was transferred to Bengaluru.

The media exposed the scam in 2012. Thereafter, to harass the officer, Andrews was served notice for allegedly not conducting an inspection of M/s Vijaya Leasing, which was controlled by the family of then tourism minister Gali Janardhana Reddy, on July 11, 2012.  He was discharged by a full departmental enquiry.

The petitioner was issued a second show cause notice on Jan 29, 2014 on the same charges. Before his retirement, he was docked two increments, denied promotional benefits and his pension was reduced without following due process.

He was served yet another notice with charges that he did not inspect goods vehicles, and an order was passed on April 30, 2019 reducing his pension by 5 per cent, an unprecedented punitive action.

This order was quashed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT), which also ordered payment of retirement benefits to Andrews within five months. However, the benefits were not released to him.  

“Rule 214 of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules (KCSR) make it clear that no enquiry can be held four years after an officer’s retirement.  Belying all statutory rules and precedents of the Supreme Court, Josephat Andrews’ retirement benefits were withheld for five years. Andrews therefore approached the High Court,” advocate Ramananda explained.

Josephat Andrews recalled to Deccan Chronicle that although mining activity was in full swing in 2008, the commercial tax department maintained that it had nothing to do with mining. “I travelled to Gujarat, Maharashtra and Bellary to investigate. I found tax evasion of thousands of crores. When I visited M/s the Vijaya Leasing facility – it was operating from an old oil mill premises–within 20 minutes I got calls from Ali, a person claiming to be the personal assistant of Gali Janardhan Reddy. He told me to get out of the premises as it belonged to his boss. Then calls came from minister Sreeramulu and MLA Nagendra. 

Within minutes 200-300 rowdies gathered around the building and my superior asked me to come back. Instead of filing a police complaint and forming a special team to deal with the situation, the department transferred me to Bengaluru,” he explained.

Talking about the High Court directive, Josephat Andrews said, “I have suffered a lot. Instead of getting a reward for increasing revenues by Rs 2,000 crore, I was punished.”

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.