Triple Talaq has no place in a secular country: Centre tells Supreme Court

October 8, 2016

New Delhi, Oct 8: The Centre on Friday opposed before the Supreme Court the practice of triple talaq, saying anything that is subjected to the whims of menfolk was incompatible with the principle of gender equality and justice as enshrined in the Constitution.

talaq“Gender justice and dignity of women are non-negotiable and overarching constitutional values, and can brook no compromise in a secular country like India,” the government stated. In an affidavit, the NDA government contended that triple talaq, nikah halala' (bar against remarriage with divorced husband, without an intervening marriage with another man) and polygamy cannot be regarded as an integral part of the religion.

“Even theocratic countries where Islam is a state religion have undergone reforms, so these practices cannot be regarded as integral to the religion and India being a secular republic, there is no reason to deny the women rights available under the Constitution,” the law ministry said.

Coming out in support of a batch of petitions, including one by advocate Balaji Srinivasan on behalf of Shayara Bano, the government said the issue of the validity of triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy needs to be considered in the light of principles of gender justice and overriding constitutional principles of non-discrimination, dignity and equality.

The Centre stated: “Secularism being a hallmark of Indian democracy, no part of its citizenry ought to be denied access to fundamental rights, much less can a section of secular society be worse off than its counterparts in theocratic countries, many of which have undergone reforms.”

The Centre said though polygamy was regarded progressive and path-breaking centuries ago, in light of the principle of gender justice, it required “serious reconsideration”.

Triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy cannot be regarded as essential and integral part of the religion and would therefore be not entitled to protection under Article 25 (right to practice religion) of the Constitution, it added.

Even an affidavit by the Muslim Personal Law Board has referred to those practices as “undesirable” and which cannot be elevated to essential religious practice, the government said.

“Personal laws must be examined in the light of the overarching goal of gender justice and dignity of women... Any provision of the personal law which is inconsistent with fundamental rights is void,” the government said. Can personal laws, meant to preserve diverse identity, be used as a pretext to deny women equality and status available under the Constitution, the Centre asked

Comments

shaji
 - 
Monday, 10 Oct 2016

Muslim Ulemas need to educate Ummah on Talaq issue as it is being misused and practiced incorrectly. It is not surprising that Central Govt is not accepting Shariat in the presence of advisers like MJ Akbar, Mukhtar Abbas, shanawaz, Muneer kallapally etc who have zero knowledge about islam. These people are traitors like Mir Qasim and busy in appeasing BJP high command.

Go Moothra
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Viren ......wish to become Muslim as we have a chance to marry 4 wives...... Bad luck......

but you should also know that you can marry 4 wives only if you can maintain Justice between which is almost a difficult task for Non Muslim...because we eat beef and have the strength to maintain all the daily aspects ....unlike a Fanatic Hindutva activist... who eat beef but with bear or whisky or rum

Abdulla
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Please watch this
MAJHA VISHESH : Aurangabad: Discussion on Ban Muslim Triple Talaq Law

Also this...
Br.imran Answering About Triple Talaq To a Non Muslim Sister.

And YOU judge yourself....

Kaizer
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

People doesnt know what exactly triple talaq means
Wel Said Ahmed KC
there are some rulings in triple talaq, it doesnt mean u say triple talaq and the relationship goes invalid.
Follow the exact rulings of triple talaq which will be a best solution for everyone.

Ahmed K. C.
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Muslims are taking advantage of \triple talaq\" without knowing the correct way of \"triple talaq\"
If followed in the right way, there is no better solution than this for any broken marriages."

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 29,2020

Mangaluru, Apr 29: One person was arrested on charges of murdering a middle-aged couple on Wednesday in Yellinje near Kinnigoli.

The area falls under the jurisdiction of Mulky police.

Police said that the deceased were identified as Vincent D’Souza (50) and his wife Helina D’ Souza (45).

The arrested was identified as Alphonso (55). He will be sent to judicial custody, said police.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 4,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 4: Karnataka High Court on Monday reserved order on plea, seeking cancellation of bail granted to Nithyananda for skipping the trial and fleeing the country.

After hearing the arguments, the court has reserved the matter for further orders which will be pronounced on February 5.

The plea, which was filed in the high court on January 23, was heard by Justice John Michael Cunha.

The counsel for the complainant Lenin put forth arguments that the self-styled godman Swami Nithyananda had fled the country to escape the trial. "Nityananda has been claiming to be in India in his exemption petitions filed before the trial court but during that time he sought asylum in Ecuador and is having a second passport," said Lenin.

The prosecutor informed the court that they do not need his presence for the trial at this time.

Nithyananda, accused of rape and child abuse, has been absconding since November 2018.

In December 2019, the Ministry of External Affairs said that the passport of Nithyananda was cancelled and a fresh application of the same was denied as he did not get the requisite clearance from police and several criminal cases have been lodged against him.

Police in Ahmedabad had arrested two woman administrators of the ashram, allegedly owned by Nithyananda, and freed two boys who were held captive there.

Two of his disciples, Pranpriya and Priyatattva, were arrested on the basis of a complaint filed by one Janardhan Sharma who alleged that his daughter was held captive in Nithyananda's ashram.

The police took the two women to Nithyananda's ashram in Hathiajan for an investigation and seized laptops, mobile phones among other things.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 4,2020

New Delhi: The Ministry of Home Affairs of Government of India today clarified to the Lok Sabha in a written reply that the so called “Love Jihad” is not defined under the extant laws and no such cases have been reported by any central agency.

It was ministry’s formal response to questions about whether the central government is aware of the observation of Kerala High Court that there is no case of Love Jihad in Kerala.

“The term ‘Love Jihad’ is not defined under the extant laws. No such case of ‘Love Jihad’ has been reported by any of the central agencies. However, two cases from Kerala involving interfaith marriages have been investigated by the NIA,” said the reply.

Communal and anti-Muslim political outfits backed by a section of media often use the term “Love Jihad” to accuse Muslims of marrying Hindu and Christian girls and then forcing them to change religion. Dr Hadiya’s conversion was also termed ‘love jihad’ by the BJP and media. The Supreme Court finally ruled that it wasn’t.

In January 2020, an influential Catholic Church in Kerala had said that “love jihad is a reality” and alleged that scores of women from Christian community from the southern state were being lured into the trap of Islamic State and used in terror activities.

The Viswa Hindu Parishad (VHP) had welcomed the Church statement and called for a united fight against ‘Love Jihad’ in Kerala Society.

The response comes weeks after the MHA, responding to an RTI query, said it has "no information" concerning the 'Tukde Tukde Gang' -- a term that has been used a number of times by PM Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to attack opponents.

The RTI application was filed by activist Saket Gokhle on December 26 last year. In his RTI application, Saket Gokhle said Home Minister "Amit Shah addressed a public event in New Delhi, and in his address said, 'The Tukde Tukde Gang of Delhi needs to be taught a lesson and punished'." Gokhle's RTI asked for details of the 'Tukde Tukde Gang'.

The home ministry, in its reply to Saket Gokhle's RTI application, said, "Ministry of Home Affairs has no information concerning tukde-tukde gang."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.