Triple Talaq has no place in a secular country: Centre tells Supreme Court

October 8, 2016

New Delhi, Oct 8: The Centre on Friday opposed before the Supreme Court the practice of triple talaq, saying anything that is subjected to the whims of menfolk was incompatible with the principle of gender equality and justice as enshrined in the Constitution.

talaq“Gender justice and dignity of women are non-negotiable and overarching constitutional values, and can brook no compromise in a secular country like India,” the government stated. In an affidavit, the NDA government contended that triple talaq, nikah halala' (bar against remarriage with divorced husband, without an intervening marriage with another man) and polygamy cannot be regarded as an integral part of the religion.

“Even theocratic countries where Islam is a state religion have undergone reforms, so these practices cannot be regarded as integral to the religion and India being a secular republic, there is no reason to deny the women rights available under the Constitution,” the law ministry said.

Coming out in support of a batch of petitions, including one by advocate Balaji Srinivasan on behalf of Shayara Bano, the government said the issue of the validity of triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy needs to be considered in the light of principles of gender justice and overriding constitutional principles of non-discrimination, dignity and equality.

The Centre stated: “Secularism being a hallmark of Indian democracy, no part of its citizenry ought to be denied access to fundamental rights, much less can a section of secular society be worse off than its counterparts in theocratic countries, many of which have undergone reforms.”

The Centre said though polygamy was regarded progressive and path-breaking centuries ago, in light of the principle of gender justice, it required “serious reconsideration”.

Triple talaq, nikah halala' and polygamy cannot be regarded as essential and integral part of the religion and would therefore be not entitled to protection under Article 25 (right to practice religion) of the Constitution, it added.

Even an affidavit by the Muslim Personal Law Board has referred to those practices as “undesirable” and which cannot be elevated to essential religious practice, the government said.

“Personal laws must be examined in the light of the overarching goal of gender justice and dignity of women... Any provision of the personal law which is inconsistent with fundamental rights is void,” the government said. Can personal laws, meant to preserve diverse identity, be used as a pretext to deny women equality and status available under the Constitution, the Centre asked

Comments

shaji
 - 
Monday, 10 Oct 2016

Muslim Ulemas need to educate Ummah on Talaq issue as it is being misused and practiced incorrectly. It is not surprising that Central Govt is not accepting Shariat in the presence of advisers like MJ Akbar, Mukhtar Abbas, shanawaz, Muneer kallapally etc who have zero knowledge about islam. These people are traitors like Mir Qasim and busy in appeasing BJP high command.

Go Moothra
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Viren ......wish to become Muslim as we have a chance to marry 4 wives...... Bad luck......

but you should also know that you can marry 4 wives only if you can maintain Justice between which is almost a difficult task for Non Muslim...because we eat beef and have the strength to maintain all the daily aspects ....unlike a Fanatic Hindutva activist... who eat beef but with bear or whisky or rum

Abdulla
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Please watch this
MAJHA VISHESH : Aurangabad: Discussion on Ban Muslim Triple Talaq Law

Also this...
Br.imran Answering About Triple Talaq To a Non Muslim Sister.

And YOU judge yourself....

Kaizer
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

People doesnt know what exactly triple talaq means
Wel Said Ahmed KC
there are some rulings in triple talaq, it doesnt mean u say triple talaq and the relationship goes invalid.
Follow the exact rulings of triple talaq which will be a best solution for everyone.

Ahmed K. C.
 - 
Saturday, 8 Oct 2016

Muslims are taking advantage of \triple talaq\" without knowing the correct way of \"triple talaq\"
If followed in the right way, there is no better solution than this for any broken marriages."

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 31,2020

Kasaragod, Mar 31: Two more Kasaragod natives lost their lives on Monday due to blockade of the interstate border by Karnataka police in the wake of outbreak of novel coronavirus.

They could not get emergency health care as the Karnataka police stopped the ambulance carrying them to a hospital in Mangaluru at the border.

Another critically-ill person, who was sent back by Manguluru hospital authorities on March 23 for being a Kasaragod native, also died on Monday.

This is the fifth such case in many days.

The deceased are Madhavan, 50, Ayesha, 55 and Aziz Haji, 61 respectively.

All three of them lived near the Karnataka border.

Madhavan, who hailed from Thummanattu in Manjeswaram, died enroute to Kanhangad hospital after being denied entry to cross over to Karnataka. He had an acute bronchial attack.

Udyavar native Ayesha, an asthma patient, was referred to the Mangaluru Hospital by the hospital authorities at Uppali. When the authorities stopped her at the border, she was taken to the Kanhangad hospital. However, she died before reaching the hospital.

Aziz Haji, from Nayabazar Cherugoli MA Cottage at Uppala, was allegedly refused entry into a Manguluru Hospital on March 23 on account of being a Kasaragod native. Haji was a dialysis patient at the hospital. “We were unable to contact his doctor at the time,” his relatives said. Haji, who was on the ventilator, lost his life Monday morning.

One more from Kerala dies as Karnataka police stop ambulance at border
Kunjathoor native Abdul Hameed and Bandwal native Fathima also lost their lives due to the closing of the interstate border.

The district authorities has appealed to the Government to intervene in the matter and influence Karnataka as to lift a ban in crossing over for ambulances carrying critical patients.

The people of Kasaragod are largely dependent on the medical facilities in Mangaluru for critical illness care.

The Kasaragod MP, Rajmohan Unnithan has said he would move the Supreme court against this.

Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has already taken up the issue with the Centre.

Kerala HC takes up issue with Karnataka AAG

The Kerala High Court on Monday sought the views of the Advocate General of Karnataka on the issue of the government of the neighbouring state blocking its borders with Kerala.

Considering a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Kerala High Court Advocates Association, seeking a direction for opening the roads, a bench comprising Justices A K Jayasankaran Nambiar and Shaji P Chali requested the Advocate General of Karnataka to join the hearing at 11 am on Tuesday through video conferencing.

The Court orally observed that the blockades erecting embankments on the inter-state roads would affect the people's right to life.

The Karnataka government blocked the state highway with to prevent movement of vehicles carrying essential goods and people seeking emergency treatment at hospitals in the city of Mangalore bordering Kasaragod.

With 97 infected patients, Kasaragod has the largest number of COVID-19 cases in Kerala. 7,437 people are under observation in the district.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 20,2020

Bengaluru, Mar 20: The high court on Thursday directed the government to notify on its official website the penal provisions to be enforced against private schools violating norms relating to fees and safety of students, among other things. A division bench of chief justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka granted six weeks to the authorities to comply while disposing of a PIL filed by advocate NP Amrutesh.

Earlier, the state government submitted a memo stating that necessary amendments have been brought to Karnataka Education Act in 2017. It said any breach of students' safety entails a minimum jail term of six months and Rs 1 lakh fine for a convicted employee or member of the management. Any institution found guilty by the District Education Regulatory Authority will face disaffiliation and must pay a fine of Rs 10 lakh, the memo said.

Schools collecting donations and other fees beyond what is prescribed can be fined up to Rs 10 lakh and they must refund the excess fee.

In relation to schools charging for applications and brochures, the state capped their prices at Rs 5 and Rs 20 respectively, by issuing a gazzette notification last year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 16,2020

Bengaluru, May 16: At least 23 new COVID-19 positive cases have emerged in the past 19 hours, raising Karnataka''s tally to 1,079, a health official said on Saturday.

"New cases reported from Friday 5 p.m. to Saturday noon are 23," said the official.

Among the 1,079 cases, 548 are active and isolated in designated hospitals across the state, 494 patients got discharged and 36 died of the virus.

In the past 19 hours, cases spiked in Benglaluru Urban, the place hosting the highest number of coronavirus cases in the state.

Of the new cases, Bengaluru Urban reported 14 cases, followed by 3 in Hassan and Mandya, Ballari, Bagalkote, Davangere, Dharwad and Udupi, 1 each.

All the 14 cases, men, from Bengaluru Urban were secondary contacts of positive case 653.

All Hassan, Dharwad and Bagalkote cases had a history of inter-state travel to Mumbai, Maharashtra, India''s largest sufferer of Covid.

A 46-year-old man from Ballari had a travel history to Ahmedabad in Gujarat, another major COVID-19 hotspot state in India.

A 40-year-old man from Mandya had inter-district travel history to Kolar and Bengaluru.

A 1-year-old infant girl from Udupi had international travel history to Dubai.

Among the new cases, 15 are contacts of earlier cases.

Of the all cases, 20 are men and three women.

Only four of the 23 cases are above 50 and 18 below 40.

Of the 1,079 cases, 12 per cent patients were senior citizens, 66 per cent men and 34 per cent women with a discharge rate of 44 per cent.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.