Udupi: BJP sweeps Zilla Panchayat, all 3 Taluk Panchayats; Cong suffers blow

[email protected] (CD Network)
February 23, 2016

bjpUdupi, Feb 23: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has swept the elections to the udupi Zilla Panchayat and all the three taluk panchayats in the district.

The results gave a major blow to the Congress party in coastal district as it not only faced second consecutive defeat in the ZP, but also lost three seats compared to the previous election.

The BJP, which had won 16 out of 25 seats in 2011, has now improved its performance by winning 20 out of 26 seats. The Congress has managed to win only 6 seats. In 2011 it had won 9 ZP seats. More details are awaited.

Udupi ZP election results at a glance

Party BJP Cong Others
2005 (25 seats) 12 13 0
2011 (25 seats) 16 09 0
2016(26 seats) 20 06 0

Udupi ZP Constituency

Winners

Perdoor

Sudhakar Shetty (Cong)

Brahmavar

Sheela Shetty (BJP)

Udyavar

Dinakar (BJP)

Hiriyadka

Chandrika (Cong)

Kurkaalu

Geetanjali (BJP)

Shirva

Wilson (Cong)

Yellur

Shilpa (BJP)

Padubidri

Shashikanth (BJP)

Hebri

Jyothi (BJP)

Belmannu

Reshma (BJP)

Bailoor

Sumith (BJP)

Meeyaru

Divya (BJP)

Bajagoli

Udaya Kotian (BJP)

Kota

Raghavendra Kanchan (BJP)

Mandarthi

Prathap Hegde (BJP)

Kavraadi

Jyothi (Cong)

Kalyanapura

Janardhana Thonse (Cong)

Shiroor

Suresh (BJP)

Baindoor

Shankara Poojary (BJP)

Kambada Kone

Gouri (BJP)

Thrasi

Shobha (BJP)

Vandse

Babu Shetty (BJP)

Koteshwara

Lakshmi (BJP)

Beejadi

Lata (BJP)

Siddapura

Taranath Shetty (BJP)

Haladi

Supritha (BJP)

Udupi’s 3 TP results at a glance

TP Total BJP Cong Others
Udupi 41 27 14 00
Karkala 20 19 01
Kundapur 37 27 10
Total

Also Read:

Will do deep introspection of Congress performance in DK, Udupi: UT Khader

Congress wrests Mangaluru, Bantwal Taluk Panchayats from BJP

Dakshina Kannada Zilla, Taluk panchayat election results at a glance

Counting begins in ZP, TP polls across Karnataka: Click her

Comments

abdul
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This looks majority of people have voted based on caste/sects. muslim candidates won in muslim majority area even candiadates are not deserved and similarly in other relegion dominated areas too. this needs to be eradicated and elect the honest people who really works for betterment of society in all fileds.
I assume this result definatly not based on the performance of the previous tenure or state/central government performance.
every voters are the decision makers for future India.

IBRAHIM.HUSSAIN
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This results shows the way to Sorake to resign from his current ministry. Oscar fernandes to be dethroned from Congress central hicommand. Mr. Promod must come out of Sorake/Oscar combine and work independently. We know he is a loyal worker of the party. But as long as the two opportunists are in the party, congress popularity will decline to Zero. This is a ringing bell to all congress great and mini leaders of Udupi District.

ASH
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

GOOD LESSON FOR SORAKE.... IF U DONT GIVE TICKET FOR MUSLIMS U WILL NEVER GET MUSLIM VOTE.

MUSLIM VOTERS ARE THE DECISION MAKERS

Farooq
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

tight slap on the face of Sorake

ASIF
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

THANKS FOR SUPPORTING BJP..... SPECIALLY SDPI AND OTHER CongRSS leaders...

Zahoor Ahmed
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP must appreciate Congress (Oscar,Sorake,Ramanath Rai ) for retain Both districts

S.M. Nawaz Kuk…
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

JP Effect in Udupi Dist

SK
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

In the two coastal districts, Bjp wil have the upper hand.......that is seen in every day life......

pakka congress
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

This is really same for us all congressmen, people are not voting for true face, BJP s worst ruling in india.,

harishchandra
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

congress did so much kithapathi still BJP won, this is the truth of True leadership.

Pradeep Chinnaswamy
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP won, so exited will celebrate in bengaluru,

Saleem
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

its total cheating vote counted, BJP government can do whatever they want until they are in power.

Mohan Kamte
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

Congress take up JNU Student to defeat ZP election, but congress itself bites the dust.

Surendra
 - 
Tuesday, 23 Feb 2016

BJP Jai Ho, Expected result.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
May 2,2020

Newsroom, May 2: The Delhi Police’s move to book Delhi Minorities Commission chairman Zafarul Islam Khan under sedition charges over his social media statement condemning Hindutva bigots has raised many eyebrows. 

A pubic statement has been issued in solidarity with Zafarul Islam Khan by a group of NGOs and citizens which condemned the media trial targeting Khan.

The statement demanded legal action against those who are distorting Khan's Facebook post and spreading false propaganda against him.

Delhi Police Special Cell registered the FIR against Khan on the complaint of a Vasant Kunj resident. The complaint came to the Lodhi Colony office of the special cell, after the assistant commissioner of police (ACP) Safdarjung Enclave forwarded it.

The investigation has been handed over to special cell inspector Praveen Kumar.

According to the FIR, Khan has been booked under several sections of the Indian Penal Code -- 124 A (sedition) and 153 A (Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc,).

Khan on April 28 had posted controversial comments on his Facebook page. "Mind you, bigots, Indian Muslims have opted until now not to complain to the Arab and Muslim world about your hate campaigns and lynchings and riots. The day they are pushed to do that, bigots will face an avalanche," Khan had written on Facebook.

However, the Delhi Minorities Commission's chief on Friday had apologised for his controversial remark and had said that he never tried to tarnish the image of India. He also removed the controversial post from the social media and issued a prolonged clarification.

 

Comments

JMJ
 - 
Monday, 4 May 2020

Thank god... Our law and order works..... Unforturnately not all the time and most of the time work selectively

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 6,2020

New Delhi, Mar 6: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a plea seeking framing of a proper mechanism to deal with alleged misuse of the sedition law by the government machinery. A bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar dismissed the plea filed by a social activist and said it was open for the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority.

At the outset, the apex court told advocate Utsav Singh Bains, appearing for the petitioner, that he could not seek quashing of an FIR in a sedition case filed against the management of a Karnataka school for allegedly allowing students to stage an anti-CAA and anti-NRC drama.

Bains told the bench that he was not just pressing for a prayer to quash the FIR but the petitioner has also sought a direction for framing of a proper mechanism to deal with the alleged misuse of the sedition law.

"Let the affected party come and we will hear them. Why it should be done at your instance," the bench said, refusing to entertain the petition.

The petition had sought quashing of the FIR against the principal and other staff of the Shaheen School at Bidar who have been booked under sections 124A (sedition) and 153A (promoting enmity between different groups) of the Indian Penal Code.

The plea had also sought an apex court direction for a proper mechanism to deal with alleged government misuse of the sedition law.

Section 124A of the IPC says that "whoever brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards... the Government shall be punished with imprisonment for life...".

The plea had sought a direction to the Centre and the Karnataka government "to quash the FIR registered in connection of seditious charges against the school management, teacher and a widowed parent of a student for staging a play criticising CAA, NRC and NPR."

The petition had claimed that the police "also questioned students, and videos and screenshots of CCTV footage showing them speaking to the students were shared widely on social media, prompting criticism."

The drama was staged on January 21 by students of the fourth, the fifth and the sixth standard.

The sedition case was filed based on a complaint by social worker Neelesh Rakshyal on 26 January.

The complainant alleged that the school authorities "used" the students to perform a drama where they "abused" Modi in the context of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 20,2020

Mangaluru, Apr 20: The Dakshina Kannada district administration had declared certain areas in the district as containment zones after COVID-19 positive cases were detected from there.

A seal down has been declared in these zones, completely banning all movement of the people including leaving their houses.

In Ajjavara, Sullia taluk a one-kilometre containment zone has been set up on April 19.

The zone stretches from Ankotimar Road and includes Forest agriculture land and the residences of Savera and Achar.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.