Umpires agreed to fix matches, claims India sting

October 9, 2012

ICC_World_t20

Mumbai, October 9: Every once in a while, with depressing frequency, the cricket world is jolted by allegations of match-fixing. But so far, these had only involved players.

On Monday, though, private news channel unveiled a sting operation, conducted in July and August, which seems to reveal that umpires, who are supposed to protect the laws of the game, may themselves be up for sale.

The channel's sting allegedly caught six umpires from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka on camera 'agreeing' to give decisions on demand.

The umpires named in the sting operation are Nadeem Ghauri and Anees Siddiqui of Pakistan, Nadir Shah of Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka's Gamini Dissanayake, Maurice Winston and Sagara Gallage.



TOI could not independently ascertain the veracity of the channel's claims. Ghauri and Shah have already denied the allegations, with Shah terming them "absolutely rubbish".

The International Cricket Council has launched an investigation into the allegations made by the channel.

The ICC, in a release on Monday, said, "The ICC and its relevant members have been made aware of the allegations made by the news channel this evening and calls on the station to turnover any information which can assist the ICC's urgent investigations into this matter.

The ICC re-iterates its zero-tolerance towards corruption whether alleged against players or officials. The ICC confirms that none of the umpires named were involved in any of the official games of the ICC World Twenty20 in Sri Lanka. The ICC will not make any further comment on this issue."

In the sting operation, the reporters said they belonged to a sports management company and promised the umpires assignments in different events around the world, largely domestic Twenty20 leagues.

While Ghauri and Shah appeared to agree to give wrong decisions, Gallage was ready to pass on information about the toss, the pitch and weather conditions in a match before it was available to the public.

In May, the same television channel's sting operation prompted the Indian cricket board to ban one uncapped cricketer for life and hand out lesser punishments to four others for involvement in corruption in domestic cricket.


Last year, Pakistan players Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir were jailed in Britain following a sting operation for their role in a spot-fixing scandal relating to a test match against England at Lord's in August 2010.

Amongst the officials caught in the operation, only Shah and Sharfuddoula Ibne Shahid represent the current panel of the ICC. The channel, however, claimed that Sharfudoullah refused to give any favours.

The expose seemed to show Sri Lankan umpire Gallage agreeing to leak information on the pitch, weather, toss, and even the playing elevens of India and Pakistan ahead of their World T20 warm-up match for Rs 50,000.

Gallage, who was the fourth umpire in the game, went to the extent of guaranteeing support for a 'particular player' in case of any disciplinary action, the footage showed.

He also promised not to dock the player of his match fee should he be pulled up for slow over-rate. Dissanayake was shown as claiming that "by providing liquor to Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) officials, one can get any work done."

A stunned SLC chairman Nishantha Ranatunga told TOI that the board would take action as soon as the ICC probe into the matter was over. "The SLC has zero tolerance level against doping and corrupt activities.

We are waiting for the ICC to launch an investigation into this and once the probe is over, we'll take necessary action. Having said that, we have the highest confidence in our match officials," Ranatunga said.

Ghauri, a former ICC umpire from Pakistan, appeared to promise to 'do anything' for a payment. Ghauri has officiated in 43 ODIs and 14 Tests and his last international game came in November 2010.

The channel claimed Ghauri's countryman Siddiqui also was ready to get a decision in favour of India for money. 'Anees promised that he would manage the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to accept a decision favourable to India,' the channel said.

Officials from the cricket boards of Bangladesh and Pakistan could not be reached for comment.

The dialogue between the umpires and the reporters

NADEEM GHAURI

Reporter: Achha achha maan lijiye jaise LBW hai (OK, take for example, LBW)

Nadeem: Haan ji (Yes)

R: Leg before wicket

N: Haan (Yes)

R: Isme, uska khiladi ka favour ho sakta hai? (Here, can that player be favoured?)

N: Haan, bilkul bilkul. (Yes, certainly, certainly)

R: To yeh favour kar denge aap? (So, will you carry out this favour?)

N: Haan, bilkul yeh ho sakta hai. (Yes, this can certainly be done.)

R: Haan toh isi tareeke ke, jaise maan lijiye bahut close nick hota hai bat se, caught behind the wicket hota hai. (So, in the same fashion, imagine a very close nick. It can be a caught behind)

N: Haan yeh bhi theek hai, kyonki wahaan jakar jo meeting hoti hai usme yeh dekhna padega ki Snickometer toh nahi hai ya Hawkeye to nahi hai. (Yes, this is also OK, because there is a meeting to ascertain whether it is a Snickometer or Hawkeye)

NADIR SHAH

Reporter: Sir, fixing toh BPL mein bhi bahut hua hai. (Sir, there has also been a lot of fixing in the BPL)

Nadir: Haan hua, do aadmi ko pakda. Kaun kiya fixing maloom hai, woh naam bataya Jamshed, woh left handed opener. (Yes, there was. They even caught two men. We know who carried out the fixing. Jamshed, that left-handed opener.)

R: Jamshed?

N: Woh teen run-out kar diya, Jamshed jo India ka saath century kiya na. (The same one who did three run-outs, Jamshed scored a century against India, no?)

R: Nasir Jamshed, Pakistani opener?

N: Haan. (Yes.)

R: Lekin Pakistan ne usko ban kyon nahi kiya Nasir Jamshed ko? (But why didn't Pakistan ban him, that Nasir Jamshed?)

N: Pakistan ne nahi kiya because the information was later on didn't pass. (Pakistan did not because the information was not passed on.) They had the proof, they manage down the carpet. Because that will have a bad name on BPL and Bangladesh Cricket Board, which we cannot afford

R: Hamare player ko jo favour mil sakta hai SLPL mein aapse, woh kin kin cheezon mein mil sakta hai? (What are the kinds of favour our player can get from you during the SLPL?)

N: LBW

SAGARA GALLAGE

Sagara: Three things I can do it. I can do the pitch report at least one and a half before the start the match.

Reporter: OK! You can give me pitch report half an hour before the match start. You are talking about the SLPL final.

S: That's true, tomorrow.

R: OK! Tomorrow, Ya second

S: Second one is the team, playing eleven, before 35 minutes of the match start.

R: What about the third thing?

S: Third thing is toss. Who won the toss, who is fielding, who is batting. I will inform because we show in the TV at the last moment of the start of the match but I can tell you about 25 minutes before the start

A STRING OF STINGS

No. 1: Bangladesh umpire Nadir Shah told the India TV undercover reporter that he was ready to fix any match - whether international, county or league matches. Nadir Shah offered to give decisions like "out", "not out" in any format of the game. He has officiated in 40-plus one-day internationals, six test matches as TV umpire and three tests as reserve umpire. Nadir Shah also revealed on hidden camera that Pakistan's opening batsman Nasir Jamshed 'fixed' several matches during the Bangladesh Premier League. He also said, umpires from Bangladesh are always ready to 'help' their country's cricketers.

No. 2: Sri Lankan premier panel umpire Sagara Gallage was the fourth umpire at the crucial India-Pakistan T20 World Cup match on Sept 17. For a payment of Rs 50,000, Sagara agreed to reveal the match pitch report, weather report, toss report, and even the playing elevens of both teams. Gallage promised to give Pak batsman Imran Nazir out, even if he was not out, in exchange of money in Sri Lankan Premier League. Gallage even promised the undercover reporter to get a decision made in favour of India in course of the match by 'managing' the match referee and other officials.

No. 3: Pakistan's ICC international panel umpire Nadeem Ghauri also agreed to help Team India in all manners. As quid pro quo, he agreed to take all amounts underhand in "black". He promised to do any kind of favour for any player in umpiring.

No. 4: Sri Lankan's premier panel umpire Maurice Winston Dela Zilwa's name was recommended by another Sri Lankan umpire Sagara Gallage to the India TV undercover reporter. For the crucial T20 world cup match on Sept 17 between Australia and England, Maurice Winston shared the pitch report, toss report and playing elevens of both teams and demanded Rs 50,000 bribe. He agreed to take the entire amount in 'black'.

No. 5: Sri Lankan umpire Gamini Dissanayake went a step ahead. On camera, he promised to 'revolt' against Sri Lankan cricket if given a handsome amount. Gamini told the undercover India TV reporter that by providing liquor and picnic to Sri Lankan Cricket Board officials, one can get any work done. Gamini's name was mentioned by Maurice Winston.

No. 6: Pakistan's elite panel umpire Anees Siddiqui was also ready to get a decision in favour of Team India in lieu of money in black. Anees promised that he would manage the PCB to accept a decision favourable to India.

No. 7: Bangladesh ICC international panel umpire Sharfudoullah Ibne Shahid Saikat was also approached. He however refused to give any favour in exchange of money.

No. 8: Minhazuddin Khan, the media manager of Dhaka Gladiators revealed to India TV undercover reporter that Pakistan's player Azhar Mehmood had indulged in match-fixing during the Sri Lankan Premier League. He didn't come to play. Minhaz also revealed that Pakistani cricketers Shahid Afridi, Rana Naved and Ahmed Shahzad regularly used to take call girls to their rooms straight from aftermatch parties. Minhaz also revealed that he and Bangladesh opened Tamil Iqbal often used to go to Dubai and Malaysia for holidays, and used to get money from Bangladesh through 'hawala'.

No. 9: Sandeep Bhammer, the promoter of Sri Lankan Premier League agreed to give sponsorships of all franchises in lieu of US$7,40,000.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 21,2020

Jul 21: The tickets sold for the now-postponed ICC T20 World Cup will remain valid if Australia hosts the edition in 2021 instead of India.

In case the event is shifted to 2022, all ticket-holders will be entitled to a full refund, the ICC stated on its website on Monday night after postponing the mega-event this year due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The tournament was to be held in October-November but will now be conducted later because of the pandemic.

The ICC has not yet announced which country will host which edition as there are operational issues that both the Indian and Australian cricket Boards need to sort out.

The world body had opened ticket booking through its ticketing partners and a significant number was already sold.

"Ticket holders are welcome to retain their tickets, noting, if Australia hosts in 2021, tickets will remain valid for fans who have already bought and will be automatically updated to reflect the new dates.

"If Australia hosts in 2022, for tickets already bought a full refund will be processed automatically," ICC stated in a series of FAQs.

Fans can retain their tickets until a date is confirmed for the event.

Refund requests can be made until December 15 and they will be processed within 30 days after an online submission.

The hospitality package will also remain valid for the 2021 fixtures.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 3,2020

Sydney, Mar 3: Former Australia pacer Brett Lee foresees a "different" looking India making their maiden T20 Women's World Cup final and attributed their rise to the emergence of star players like 16-year-old Shafali Verma.

Besides opener Shafali, experienced leg-spinner Poonam Yadav has been the other match-winner for India in the competition. The Harmanpreet Kaur-led side topped the group stage with four wins in as many games and play their semifinal here on Thursday.

"They've never reached the final but this is a different India team from the one they’ve seen before. They've combined match-winners in Shafali Verma and Poonam Yadav with consistent players with both bat and ball," Lee was quoted as saying by ICC.

"We've always known they have some of the best players in the world but now Harmanpreet Kaur has a team around her that can support the big players, and fill in the gaps when they have an off day."

Only a special effort from their opponents can stop India from reaching their maiden final, feels Lee.

They'll go into the semi-finals full of confidence and it will take an excellent team to stop them from reaching the Final."

Talking more about Shafali, who has got 47, 46, 39, and 29 so far, Lee backed the teen sensation to make a bigger score in the semifinal.

"Shafali Verma has been excellent at the top of the order, she’s brought a fearless energy to India’s batting and been brilliant to watch.

"You feel she can go even bigger as well – she hasn't reached 50 yet, which is both exciting for those watching and worrying for the bowlers.

"We saw from the opener against Australia just how good India can be, and it’s no surprise they’ve continued that form to top Group A," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 6,2020

May 6: They have similar impact on their teams but Virat Kohli is driven by sheer passion to subdue the rivals while Steve Smith just enjoys batting, says Australia opener David Warner.

India skipper Kohli and top Australian batsman Smith are arguably the top two cricketers of the current era. They achieve new milestones consistently, invoking debates, who is better between them.

"Virat's passion and drive to score runs is different to what Steve's would be," Warner said while speaking to Harsha Bhogle on 'Cricbuzz in Conversation'.

"Steve is going out there for a hit in the middle, that's how he sees things. He's hitting them out in the middle, he's having fun, he's enjoying himself, just does not want to get out."

Warner feels, while Kohli is batting he is aware that if he sticks around the middle his team will be on top of the proceedings.

"Virat obviously doesn't want to get out but he knows if he spends a certain amount of time out there, he's going to score plenty of runs at a rapid rate. He's going to get on top of you. That allows the guys coming in, especially in the Indian team you've got a lot of players who can be flamboyant as well."

The Australian opener added that both men are mentally strong and a good knock by them boosts the morale of the entire team.

"When it comes to cricket, they both have got the mental strength, the mental capacity to score runs. They both love spending time in the middle.

"They stabilise, they boost morale - if they score runs, everyone else's moral is up. If they are out cheaply you almost sense that on the field that everyone is (down on morale and thinking) 'now we all have to step up'. It's a very bizarre situation," he added.

Asked about the similarities between himself and Kohli, who are both live wires on the field, Warner said the passion to do better than the opponent keeps him going.

"I can't speak for Virat, obviously, but it's almost like we got this thing in us when we go (out to the middle) we need to prove people wrong, prove someone wrong."

"If you're in that contest, and if I'm going at him for example, you're thinking, 'Alright, I'm going to score more runs than him, I'm going to take a quick single on him'. You are trying to better that person in that game. That's where the passion comes from."

Warner also explained how he breaks down a match into smaller competitions.

"Obviously you want to win the game but you almost break it down to: If I can score more runs than Virat, or if Pujara scores more runs than Steve Smith, you have these little contests and that's how you try to narrow the game in the sense that if we do these little things, we can be ahead of the game or we can be behind the game.

"The passion is driven by...I know my sense - one, the will to win and two, wanting to do better than that person in the opposition," said Warner.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.