UPA rushes through big-ticket deals

May 14, 2014

New Delhi, May 14: The last “working” Cabinet meeting of the outgoing UPA government on Tuesday saw several big-ticket decisions—ranging from FDI in the pharma sector to appointment of the new Army chief and approval to sell 4.66 per cent stake in the state-owned Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd through a block deal.

Big-ticket_dealsOvercoming his initial hesitation over mega decisions at the fag end of his term, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh got the Cabinet to approve a $400-million proposal by global equity major KKR to acquire stake in two Indian pharma firms in a deal touted as the largest private equity in India’s health sector. This is among the deals fiercely opposed by the BJP on the ground that the outgoing government should not take any crucial decision when its tenure ends in two days.

As cleared by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), KKR will buy a 38 per cent stake in Hyderabad-based Gland Pharma, which develops and manufactures generic injectables, primarily in the cardiovascular and orthopaedic segment. In the second transaction, KKR will buy 29.4 per cent share in Gland Celsus Bio Chemicals from an existing investor.

Currently, the government allows 100 per cent FDI in both greenfield and brownfield drug manufacturing companies. Investments in greenfield are allowed through automatic route and those in brownfield or existing facilities require approval of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB).

Originally cleared by the Competition Commission of India in January, the KKR deal was stuck because of differences between the Finance and Commerce ministries. The Department of Policy and Promotion under the Commerce Ministry raised objections to the proposal as it believed several clauses of the deal did not adhere to the FDI policy on brownfield projects.

That also saw the Health Ministry joining the Commerce Ministry in advocating a lower cap on investment in the existing drug making units along with various safeguards for acquisition of domestic critical care pharma companies by multinational firms.

But the Finance Ministry and the Planning Commission wanted faster clearance to keep investors’ sentiments intact in the Indian market. The Prime Minister, however, was against the deal being cleared by the outgoing government. In the last Cabinet meeting on May 8, it was not given a nod even though Finance Minister P Chidambaram pitched for it.

On Tuesday, the CCEA also gave post-facto approval to sale of 4.66 per cent stake in state-owned Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd through a block deal, Heavy Industries Minister Praful Patel said after the Cabinet meeting. “It is post-facto, the Cabinet has cleared it,” he told reporters when asked about the decision on the BHEL stake sale.

The government had divested 4.66 per cent in the heavy engineering major through a block deal on March 3. As the original approval by the Cabinet was for divestment through a follow-on public offer, the department of disinvestment had sought a post-facto approval for the block deal. The government currently holds 63.06 per cent stake in BHEL.

Meanwhile, official corridors were abuzz with talk of Chidambaram not approving a proposal from the Prime Minister’s Office to appoint Indu Shekhar Chaturvedi, a 1987 IAS Jharkhand cadre officer, as executive assistant in the World Bank in Washington.

Apparently, Singh spoke to the finance minister to clear it. In turn, Chidambaram got his personal assistant M A Siddique, a Tamil Nadu IAS cadre officer, also cleared by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet, for placement with the World Bank.

The appointment of Muralidharan Nair as secretary to the outgoing prime minister was cleared on Tuesday.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 15,2020

New Delhi, Apr 15: The Union Health Ministry has identified 170 districts as COVID-19 hotspots and 207 districts as potential hotspots, officials said on Wednesday, reiterating that there has been no community transmission of the disease in the country so far.

Addressing the daily briefing to provide updates on coronavirus situation in the country, Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Health Lav Agarwal said that states have been asked to classify districts which have reported a higher number of cases as hotspots, the districts where cases have been reported as non-hotspots, and green zones where no cases have been reported.

"Hotspots are those districts which are reporting more number of cases or where the rate of growth of COVID-19 cases is high," Agarwal said, adding a detailed direction has been issued to states stating consolidated efforts are required to utilise this period of lockdown to curb the spread of the virus.

"Cabinet secretary held a video conference today with all chief secretaries, DGPs, health secretaries, collectors, SPs, municipal commissioners and CMOs where hotspots were discussed and orientation on field level implementation of containment strategy was given.

"They were told about large outbreak containment strategies, cluster containment strategies. Delineation of buffer and containment zone, parameter mapping, defining of entry and exit points were also discussed in detail," he said.

The joint secretary said movement of people will not be allowed in containment zones except for those related with essential services and special teams will search for new cases and samples will be collected and tested as per sampling criteria.

The officials said that health facilities in buffer zone outside the containment zone will be oriented and people facing SARI and influenza-like symptoms will be tested there.

"Special teams have been formed which will work in containment zone and do contact tracing and house-to-house surveys. Cases of fever, cough and breathlessness will be identified in the survey and requisite action will be taken as per protocol," Agarwal said, adding that there has been no community transmissions so far but some local outbreaks.

The total number of COVID-19 cases in India has risen to 11,439 with 1,076 fresh cases reported in the last 24 hours while the death toll stands at 377, the ministry official said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 26,2020

Hyderabad, Feb 26: Hyderabad Police on Tuesday registered a case against well-known poet Imran Pratapgarhi for his statement asking why there was "no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad".

According to Charminar Police, the complaint was registered by Sub-Inspector S Guruswamy, who was on duty at the QQ Stadium on February 24 where an Ehtaji Mishaira (Poetry Program) against the Citizenship Amendment Act, National Register Commission and National Population Register was held.

Permission for the said event was granted by Hyderabad Additional Commissioner of Police to the program organisers with certain guidelines including that poetry program should be held on February 24 from 6 pm to 9 pm, and no speaker should give provocative speeches in the program.

However, police said that the program was started by the organisers at 6 pm and continued till 9:48 pm even after police officers asked them to end the event by 9 pm. The program was attended by around 3,000 members at QQ stadium.

According to police, while addressing the meeting Pratapgarhi said: "Mujhe hairath hai us Hyderabad mein koi Shaheen Bagh kyu nahi hai (I am surprised why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad)", which is "provocative" and may cause fear to any section of the public.

In this regard, a case has been registered against organisers for disobeying public servants' orders and the poet has been booked for delivering provocative statements under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Further investigation is underway.

Meanwhile, Congress leader Mohammed Ali Shabbir took to Twitter to condemn the police action.

"Hyderabad Police booked a case against poet Imran Pratapgarhi for expressing surprise on why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad. For police, this sentence is provocative. Is Shaheen Bagh not a part of India?," Shabbir tweeted.

"Shame on TRS Government and Hyderabad Police for targeting a poet for no-fault," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 11,2020

Bhadohi, Feb 11: With just two days left for the State Budget Session, a widow from Uttar Pradesh''s Bhadohi district has accused BJP MLA Ravindranath Tripathi and six others of sexual harassment over the years, the police said.

The incident is likely to cause considerable embarrassment to the ruling Yogi Adityanath government.

Bhadohi Superintendent of Police (SP) Ram Badan Singh said: "The woman, whose husband died in 2007, met the BJP MLA Ravindranath Tripathi''s nephew in 2014. She said that she was physically exploited by him for many years on the pretext of marriage."

The complainant also said that the nephew then got her lodged in a Bhadohi hotel for about a month during the 2017 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, "where she was raped by the MLA and his other family members".

The case has been handed over to the Additional Superintendent of Police for further investigations.

A case is yet to be registered.

The Uttar Pradesh Budget Session starts from Thursday.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.