Violent clash erupts in Mangaluru jail; Madoor Isubu, Ganesh Shetty killed

[email protected] (CD Network | Photos by Chakravarthi)
November 2, 2015

Mangaluru, Nov 2: In a shocking incident, two under-trials were killed and several others injured when two rival gangs clashed in Mangaluru sub jail on Monday morning.

ganeshisubu copy

(Ganesh Shetty and Madoor Isubu)

The deceased have been identified as Madoor Yousuf alias Madooru Isubu (40) and Ganesh Shetty.

According to police Madoor Isubu, who was arrested in 2010, was a close aide of underworld don Chota Shakeel. He was accused of involving in more than 17 criminal cases since the year 2001, including four murders, attempt to murder, hurting, rioting and extortion.

Ganesh Shetty was also arrested in 2010 in connection with the murder case of Mahendra Pratap in 1994.

Around a dozen people have been injured in the clash. The injured also include a couple of police constables, sources said.

Some of the injured who were rushed to Government Wenlock Hospital have been identified as Iqbal, Asif, Pradeep Vamanjoor, Umesh Kombar, Yuvraj Soorinje and Shobharaj.

Even though the exact reason for the clash is yet to be ascertained by the police, sources said that it erupted when the inmates had assembled for breakfast on Wednesday morning.

It is learnt that Isubu and Shetty were attacked by the members of a gang with lethal weapons. According to a police officer, the weapons might have been thrown over the prison wall by the gang members.

According Mangaluru City Police Commissioner S Murugan, the weapons used for the murder might have been thrown over the prison wall from outside by associates of some of the under-trials.

He declined to comment on the reports that the prison had witnessed clashes between two gangs for past few days.

He said that both the murders were by the same gang of criminals. “It was the result of a violent clash between two gangs. Madoor Isubu and his alleged associate Ganesh Shetty were attacked during breakfast,” he said.

He clarified that Wednesday’s murders have no connection with any communal incidents. “It’s a clash between two gangs and not a communal clash,” he said.

Vicky Shetty claims responsibility

A notorious criminal, who is known for his inclination towards Sangh Parivar, has claimed responsibility for the cold blooded murders of two inmates at Mangaluru sub jail on Monday.

Madoor Isubu and his alleged associate Ganesh Shetty were hacked to death inside the prison by a gang during breakfast on Monday.

Vicky Shetty, a fugitive gangster, reportedly called the office of a Kannada news channel and told that his accomplices committed the crime.

“Our boys did it. Because they (victims) were anti-nationals and associates of Dawood Ibrahim,” said the caller, who identified himself as Vicky Shetty.

Arguing that the “nation” and the “underworld” are one and the same, the caller said that this murder has sent a clear message for “anti-nationals”.

Also Read: Madoor Isubu murder: Who smuggled weapons into Mangaluru jail?

jail2

jail1

jail3

jail4

jail5

jail6

jail7

jail8

jail9

jail10

jail11

subjail 1

subjail 2

subjail 3

subjail 4

jailf1

jailf2

jailf3

jailf4

jailf5

jailf6

cmjail 1

cmjail 2

cmjail 3

cmjail 4

cmjail 5cmjail 6

wenlock 1

wenlock 2

wenlock 3

Comments

Natisha
 - 
Monday, 15 Feb 2016

Thanhks for ever other fantastic article.The place else could anybody get that type of info
in such a perfect approach of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and
I amm at the search for such info.

Also visit myy page ... criminal case hack: http://criminalcase.cleandownload.net

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 8,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 8: In yet another revenue generation measure, the Revenue department has issued an order permitting the sale of government land leased to various religious, industrial and other organisations.

Officials say that around Rs 2,250 crore will be generated in Bengaluru Urban district alone, if the order is implemented.

While rules for the process are yet to be formed, it has directed deputy commissioners of various districts to submit proposals for the sale of such lands leased by the government to various institutions under the Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969. The order came after a recent Cabinet decision. 

The order issued on July 6 says that government lands leased to private organisations, trusts, industries, educational, social welfare, religious and agricultural purposes can be regularised by paying the guidance value of the land, provided the organisation continued to use the land for the same purpose it was granted for.

If an organisation or trust wanted to convert the land for other purposes, it will be charged twice the guidance value. According to the order, land leased to organisations that are unwilling to purchase the land will be surveyed. “DCs should initiate measures to survey such lands and recover the unused land to the government,” it said.

Revenue Principal Secretary N Manjunath Prasad told DH that rules for the sale of such lands will be formulated shortly. “We have directed deputy commissioners to compile the extent of land leased to various organisations in their respective districts,” he said, noting that 921 acres were leased to private parties in Bengaluru Urban district.

From the 921 acres, the state government used to receive an annual rent of Rs 6.50 crore per year. Sale of leased land in Bengaluru Urban alone will generate around Rs 2,250 crore at current guidance values, Prasad said. 

The government is also pushing for regularisation of unauthorised buildings on Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) land and auction of corner sites to mobilise resources due to the severe economic difficulties in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic and the state’s reduced share in central taxes.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 19,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 19: Pointing out that there was a deliberate attempt to cover up police excesses by implicating innocent persons at whim, the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday granted conditional bail to 21 people who were accused by police of involving in violence during the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in Mangaluru.

Allowing the bail petitions of Ashik and 20 others from Udupi and Dakshina Kannada districts, Justice John Michael Cunha said the overzealousness of the police is also evident from the fact that FIRs were registered under Section 307 of IPC against the persons killed by the police themselves.

“In an offence involving a large number of people, the identity and participation of each accused must be fixed with reasonable certainty. In the present cases, the identity appears to have been fixed on the basis of their affiliation to PFI and they being members of the Muslim community. Though it is stated that the involvement of the petitioners is captured in CCTV footage and photographs, no such material is produced before the court showing the presence of any of the petitioners at the spot, armed with deadly weapons,” the judge noted.

In the statement of objections filed by the State Public Prosecutor-I, it was stated that there was a hint of Muslim youths holding protest on December 19, 2019, opposing the implementation of CAA. Prohibitory orders were clamped in that connection. This assertion indicated that the common object of the assembly was to oppose the implementation of CAA and National Register for Citizens (NRC) which, by itself, was not an “unlawful object”, the judge pointed out.

‘Pics show cops throwing stones at crowd’

Justice Cunha also said the material collected by the investigators did not contain any specific evidence regarding the presence of any of the petitioners at the spot. On the other hand, omnibus allegations were made against the Muslim crowd of 1,500-2,000, alleging that they were armed with weapons like stones, soda bottles and glass pieces. The photographs produced by the SPP depicted that hardly any member of the crowd were armed with weapons, except one of them holding a bottle. In none of these photographs, police station or policemen were seen in the vicinity, the judge noted.

“On the other hand, photographs produced by the petitioners show that the policemen themselves were pelting stones at the crowd. The petitioners have produced copies of the complaints lodged by the dependants of the deceased who died due to police firing and the endorsement made thereon reveals that even though the law required the police to register independent FIRs in view of the specific complaint made against the police officers making out cognizable offences, the police have failed to register FIRs. This goes to show that a deliberate attempt is underway to cover up police excesses by implicating innocent persons at the whims and caprice of the police,” the judge observed.

In the wake of counter-allegations against the police and in the backdrop of their failure to register FIRs based on complaints lodged by the families of victims, the possibility of false and mistaken implication could not be ruled out, the judge said. In these circumstances, it would be a travesty of justice to deny bail to the petitioners and sacrifice their liberties to the mercy of the district administration and police. The records indicate that a deliberate attempt has been made to trump up evidence and to deprive the liberties of the petitioners by fabricating evidence. None of the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, the court said.

“The allegations levelled against the petitioners are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. There is no direct evidence to connect them with the alleged offence. The investigation appears to be malafide and partisan. In the circumstances, in order to protect the rights and liberties of the petitioners, it is necessary to admit them to bail,” the judge said.

The petitioners were arrested and remanded in judicial custody after the anti-CAA protests on charges of being members of an unlawful assembly, armed with lethal weapons, attempting to set fire to the North Police Station in Mangaluru, obstructing the police from discharging their duties and causing damage to public property, etc., on December 19 in violation of the prohibitory orders. They moved the High Court as their bail pleas had been rejected by a sessions court in Dakshina Kannada.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 6,2020

Bengaluru, April 6: Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa on Monday said he is following the one-time fasting as per the order by BJP President JP Nadda.

"I am following the one-time fasting as per the order by our national President JP Nadda, on BJP foundation day today, as a mark of respect to doctors, nurses, media personnel," said BS Yediyurappa.

In his message to BJP workers earlier today, Nadda stated, "All BJP Karyakartas to give up one meal on our Foundation Day as a way to show solidarity with people facing hardships during the lockdown. Provide food packets to 5+1 needy under #FeedtheNeedy program. In the next one week, put a system in place where we can provide two homemade face covers to each person at our booth. We should circulate videos of preparation and distribution of such face covers with #WearFaceCoverStaySafe."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.