Why is BJP avoiding polls in Delhi, wonders Kejriwal

September 9, 2014

New Delhi, Sep 9: Arvind Kejriwal, who had taken on Narendra Modi in Varanasi constituency, on Tuesday said “perhaps” he is the most popular leader in the country currently but wondered why BJP is avoiding facing polls in the capital when it claims a wave in its favour.aravind

The AAP leader, who quit the Chief Minister’s post after leading a 49-day-long government, said BJP was afraid of losing elections and that is why it was trying to avoid facing the electorate despite winning all seven seats in Lok Sabha polls in Delhi.

“They are afraid they will lose. All the surveys coming now are showing that AAP will get an overwhelming majority if the elections are held today. It is their government at the Centre, it is their government in MCD. They have seven MPs and they claim it is a wave sweeping across the nation in their favour. Then go for an election. Why they are resorting to these kind of horse trading, buying of MLAs, offering four crore rupees,” he said.

“Perhaps,” Mr. Kejriwal said when asked whether he agreed that Modi was the most popular leader in the country now.

Coming down hard on Lt Governor Najeeb Jung for seeking to invite BJP to form government in the city, Mr. Kejriwal said there was “absolutely no possibility” for the saffron party to take over the reins without indulging in horse-trading.

“The manner in which the LG of Delhi has behaved in the last few weeks clearly shows that he has been batting for BJP,” Mr. Kejriwal said.

Insisting that any invite to BJP to form government will be unconstitutional, he said “I don’t know what arithmetic the Lieutenant Governor has that he has written to the President this letter seeking approval to invite the BJP to form the government.”

Asked whether he regret fighting the elections against Mr. Modi in Varanasi, Mr. Kejriwal said ‘No’.

He said people had very “high hopes” initially that as soon as government was formed as they expected that inflation and prices will come down and corruption will be contained.

But, he said, peoples’ hopes were “betrayed”. “But people still have hopes and everyone says that let give him more time and people are willing to give him time,” Mr. Kejriwal said.

On BJP’s view that strength of the government could be known through secret ballot, he said it was not possible under the Constitution.

“We have consulted very senior advocates. No Article of the Constitution allows secret ballot and in the business rules of Delhi Legislative Assembly it is clearly written that voting can take place only by a show of hands. There is nothing about secret ballot,” he said.

Mr. Kejriwal also rejected criticism that he quit as Delhi Chief Minister to become the Prime Minister.

“I didn’t resign as chief minister to get a major role in the Centre. I resigned from the chief ministership because we actually thought that immediately, there will be Delhi Assembly elections and we will get a clear majority and then we will run government for next five years and make some big systemic changes in Delhi; that was the intention,” he said.

Mr. Kejriwal said he did not have ambition to become Prime Minister. “I have said so many times that I was personally against fighting Lok Sabha elections at that scale.” AAP had contested in around 430 seats in the Lok Sabha polls.

Asked about inner-party democracy, Mr. Kejriwal said AAP has more inner-party democracy than any other party.

“Firstly, let me say with all strength at my command that AAP has more inner-party democracy than any other party in this country. Secondly, it is a new party, we cannot expect everything to be hunky dory in this party. There are a lot of things which may not be in order. We are putting our best efforts to put them in order.

“I may have several weaknesses, I am trying to rectify them. I am a human, not god. There is one thing, our intentions are noble,” he said.

Queried about his style of leadership and whether he takes criticism as constructive, he said, “Of course. I have huge respect for Shanti Bhushan. I greatly admire and respect him. He is a guide for us. He has the right to even slap me. Whatever issues he has raised, we will work on it.”

Mr. Bhushan had last month criticised Mr. Kejriwal’s style of functioning.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 25,2020

Chennai, Apr 25: Civic authorities on Saturday turned down a plea for exhuming the body of a doctor who died of COVID-19 here and burying it in another cemetery, citing health experts' view that it was unsafe to do so. Citing a request from the wife of the deceased doctor to allow exhumation and then re-burial at a cemetery in Kilpauk, the Greater Chennai Corporation said it sought a report from a committee of public health experts to ascertain the feasibility of entertaining her plea.

The spouse of the doctor had appealed to the GCC on April 22 to exhume and bury again her husband's body. She had said that burial in the Kilpauk cemetery here was her husband's last wish and he had conveyed it to her before he was put on a ventilator.

The report of experts has said that "it is not safe" to exhume and again bury the body of a COVID-19 victim and hence "it is not possible to accept her request," the GCC said in an official release. On April 19, a city-based 55-year-old neurosurgeon died of coronavirus and his burial at the Velangadu crematorium here was marred by violence.

A mob which falsely feared that the burial may lead to the spread of contagion had attacked the corporation health employees and associates of the deceased doctor. The doctor's wife and son also had to leave the burial ground in view of the violence.

The body was brought to Velangadu as people of Kilpauk area had opposed his burial there. Over a dozen men involved allegedly in violence were arrested and remanded to judicial custody. Later, in a video message, the surgeon's wife had said that it was her husband's last wish to be interred at the Kilpauk cemetery as per Christian rituals

Chief Minister K Palaniswami and DMK president M K Stalin had spoken to her on Wednesday over the phone and condoled her husband's death.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 1,2020

New Delhi, Jan 1: Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Mumbai has allowed banks that lent money to embattled liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya to utilize seized assets, news agency reported today quoting sources from the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The court also said all parties affected by the order can appeal at the Bombay High Court till January 18.

Last month, a consortium of Indian banks petitioned a London court for ex-billionaire Vijay Mallya to be declared bankrupt over ₹9,000 crore in unpaid debts. It comes as Mallya, who founded the now defunct Kingfisher Airlines Ltd, faces extradition to his home country of India.

Mallya had fled India in March 2016 and has been living in the United Kingdom since then. The 64-year-old former Kingfisher Airlines is fighting extradition to India in relation of fraud and money laundering allegations arising out of the debt acquired from the banks.

Mallya remains on bail pending the UK High Court appeal hearing in the extradition proceedings brought by India in relation to fraud and money laundering charges amounting to ₹9,000 crores. He had been arrested on an extradition warrant back in April 2017 and has been fighting his extradition in the UK courts since then.

He was granted permission to appeal against his extradition order, which is scheduled in the Royal Courts of Justice in London for February.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 14,2020

New Delhi, Mar 14: India on Friday was mulling over the option of deporting The Wall Street Journal's South Asia deputy bureau chief for misreporting Delhi riots in which over 50 people were killed last month. However, the government denied that it had made any such decision.

Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said that a complaint was registered against Eric Bellman, the WSJ South Asia deputy bureau chief based in New Delhi, by a private individual on the government's online grievance redressal platform.

"Referring the complaint to the related office is a routine matter as per standard procedure. No such decision on deportation has been taken by the Ministry of External Affairs," Kumar said.

However, government-funded Prasar Bharati News Services had earlier tweeted screenshots of the complaint which was filed by an undersecretary in the Ministry of External Affairs, Vinesh K Kalra, saying that the ministry has asked the Indian embassy in the US to "look into the request for immediate deportation of Bellman for his "anti-India behaviour".

The official had complained to the embassy about Bellman's controversial reportage on the killing of an Intelligence Bureau staffer named Ankit Sharma.

The WSJ had reported that Ankit Sharma's brother had said that he was killed by a mob belonging to a particular religious community. Ankit's brother later told Indian media that he never spoke to the WSJ reporter.

After the Prasar Bharati tweet got circulated widely on social media, the government backtracked and said that no such decision has been taken.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.