Woman can't be denied separate house allowance in violence cases

Agencies
July 31, 2017

New Delhi, Jul 31: A victim of domestic violence cannot be denied the right to live independently without her husband only because she moved in with her parents, a sessions court has said while quashing a trial court order which had refused to grant her a separate house allowance.

Additional Sessions Judge Lokesh Kumar Sharma asked the magisterial court to decide afresh the woman's plea for Rs 12,000 a month for separate accommodation and said the court should have considered it as socially benevolent to protect such domestic violence victims.

"Mere fact that the woman was or has been residing at her parental house cannot be a valid ground for denial of her right to separate residence...her parents could not be held responsible for keeping her and her minor child after getting her married," the judge said while allowing her appeal.

The judge said that even if the woman could not place on record any document to show her standard of living during subsistence of her marriage, nothing had prevented the court from assessing an amount for her to maintain a separate house.

"Nothing had prevented the court from taking judicial notice of the prevalent rates of rent in the locality and thereafter to assess the space required for the residence of the appellant and her minor daughter. It should have awarded her some amount towards her alternate accommodation.

"The magistrate should have also considered the fact that this is an act qualifying under the category of 'Socially Benevolent Legislation', brought into effect to save women, who were victims of domestic violence, from starvation and destitution and to restore their status in society to what they were earlier enjoying in their marital homes," the judge said and remanded the matter back to the trial court.

According to the complaint lodged by the woman, she was tortured physically, verbally and emotionally at the hands of her husband after which she filed a complaint against him and sought reliefs under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

The woman, who, along with her minor daughter, was now living with her parents, had also sought entitlement to a separate residence, which was denied by the magisterial court on the ground that she was already living with her parents and there were no documents on record to assess the level of accommodation which she enjoyed in the matrimonial house.Majority of Muslims in India are descendants of Hindus: BJP MP

 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 19,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 19: Bengaluru City Crime Branch (CCB) on Wednesday raided a spa in Koramangala area and rescued six girls.

The owner of the spa is absconding and the manager has been arrested.

Further details are awaited.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 3,2020

Panipat, Mar 3: A 22-year-old man was charred to death after he came in contact with a live electricity wire while posing for a TikTok video near the Matlaudha railway station here, police said on Tuesday.

The incident took place on Monday evening when Vikas, a resident of Dharamgarh village, climbed a pole over which the wire was passing and posed for the video, police said.

His three friends were standing below when the accident took place.

Vikas came in contact with the wire carrying 25,000 volts current and was burnt, police said.

Police have sent the body for a post-mortem and started investigation into the matter.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 6,2020

Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha President Ranjit Bachchan was shot dead on Sunday because of an extra-marital relationship of his second wife.

Lucknow Police Commissioner Sujit Pandey said at a press conference here on Thursday that Ranjit Bachchan's second wife Smriti Srivastava, her paramour Dipendra and driver Sanjit Gautam have been arrested in connection with the case. All three were held on Thursday, while the shooter -- Jitendra -- is yet to be arrested.

Pandey said that Smriti wanted a divorce from Ranjit Bachchan and their case was pending in the family court since 2016. While she was keen to marry Dipendra, Ranjit Bachchan was unwilling to leave her.

"On January 17, Ranjit had met Smriti and even slapped her, which became the provocation for the murder," he said.

The Police Commissioner said that during investigation, the police had probed all possible angles, including a terror angle.

"We found there were no financial disputes, no property disputes and no terror angle to the case. It emerged that Smriti had an affair with Dipendra and wanted to leave Ranjit Bachchan, who had four criminal cases against him. Through technical and electronic surveillance, we found the connection between Smriti, Dipendra, driver Sanjit and the shooter Jitendra," he said.

Ranjeet Bachchan, 40, who had founded the Vishwa Hindu Mahasabha, was shot in the head on Sunday morning while his brother Aditya Srivastava was injured in the attack by the assailant who also snatched their mobile phones.

The attacker had covered himself in a shawl and was on foot. The police had released CCTV footages showing a suspect and announced a cash reward of Rs 50,000 for providing information.

Four police personnel, including a sub-inspector, were suspended for alleged laxity and a case was registered at the Hazratganj po

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.