Veteran journalist P. Sainath has said that the nation is in a crisis. And this crisis is not limited to just the rural area. It has become a national crisis at various areas such as agriculture, education, economy, job creation etc.
He was delivering the endowment lecture on the topic ‘Indian democracy at the post-liberalization and post-truth era’ at Media Manthan 2020 organized by the PG department of journalism and mass communication at St Aloysius College (Autonomous).
Mr Sainath said that the many policies adopted in the 90s led to India becoming unusually unequal. Referring to the speech Ambedkar had made at the Constituent Assembly while handing over the draft of the Constitution, Mr Sainath said, “Ambedkar had warned about the weakness of Indian democracy that liberty without equality allows the supremacy of a few over the multitude. Liberty, equality and fraternity must be kept together as we cannot have one without the other.”
Mr Sainath stated that the agrarian crisis was no longer about the loss of productivity, employment or about farmer suicide; it was a societal, civilizational crisis. Commenting on the lopsided policies such as cow-slaughter ban, he explained how cow slaughter ban had adversely affected many industries due to their interdependency. While Muslims who slaughtered cows were rendered helpless, the cattle traders who were mostly OBCs lost their earnings as the cattle prices crashed. An important industry like Kolhapur sandals industry in Maharashtra went bankrupt as a result of the cow slaughter ban in Maharashtra. He said the policymakers had no idea how the rural industries were interconnected. Demonetisation too devastated the rural economy as 98 percent of rural transactions happen through cash.
Mr Sainath also spoke about the crisis of inequality which affects the Dalits and the Adivasis far more than anyone else as 90 percent of the rural households take home less than Rs 10,000/- per month. “Women are yet another group whose labour is never counted in the gross domestic product. Women and girls globally do unpaid work which amounts to about 12.5 billion working hours per year. Monetarily speaking, this is worth 10.8 trillion dollars,” Mr Sainath added.
Speaking about the crisis of jobs Mr Sainath said that major companies were laying off employees just to create more profits for the investors and the adoption of artificial intelligence in the industry would further destroy millions of jobs.
Rector of St Aloysius College Institutions Fr Dionysius Vaz SJ, Principal Dr (Fr) Praveen Martis SJ, HOD of Journalism and Mass Communication department Dr (Fr) Melwyn Pinto SJ were present.
‘Veerappan and Vijay Mallya’s business models are interesting!’
Addressing the gathering during his endowment lecture on Friday, Mr Sainath made an interesting comment on the so called ‘revenue model’. “Whenever I visit IIMs and IITs for lectures on my PARI project, the students there ask me what my revenue model for my project is. I tell them that I do not have a revenue model. In fact, journalism does not begin with a revenue model. Gandhiji, Ambedkar, Bhagat Singh were all great journalists. But they did not have a revenue model,” Mr Sainath said.
On a lighter note, he said that the best revenue model that he liked was that of forest brigand Veerappan and liquor baron Vijay Mallya. “Veerappan ruled the forest for forty years and from the top ministers to the villagers he could dictate terms and liver royally. Similarly, Mallya’s revenue model was to steal the banks and run away abroad and live like a king,” Mr Sainath added.
Journalism is not and can never be a business. It is a calling, he opined. While newspaper can be a business, television can be a business, journalism per se cannot be reduced to a business. “Unfortunately today, journalists are recruited on a contract basis and they have no bargaining power; and there are no unions to fight for their cause. Hence, they are at the mercy of the corporate media houses for their survival and are made to write stories that cannot be called journalism,” Mr Sainath said.
Answering a question as to the pressures he faced as a journalist, he said that external pressures from the government or others could be very well handled. It is the internal pressures from once own media house that journalists find it difficult to manage.

Comments
Thanks for the good writeup. It if truth be told used to be a entertainment account
it. Look complicated to far brought agreeable from you!
However, how can we be in contact?
Here is my web site - the best vitamin c serum: http://www.alwaysflowers.net/?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=…
I have read some excellent stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting.
I surprise how a lot effort you put to create any such wonderful
informative website.
my blog best vitamin c serums: http://tianheqiqiu.com/comment/html/index.php?page=1&id=68442
It's fantastic that you are getting thoughts from this piece of writing as well as from our argument made at this
time.
Look into my web page vitamin c serum reviews (www.mep.aw: http://www.mep.aw/?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=885541)
Shobakka, how is Yeddi why you got married same person twice did you divorced after first marriage,
Uruda Madmaye,
Gattida Thammana avodu
Shimoga ties with Udupi. Vow. Why hiding the good news from the couple.
HAPPY MARRIED LIFE....
Dears,
don't think, if both are single, why not. But why in secret. Who can stop them.
Any way he is now son in law of D. Kannada.
So we have to arrange him a Thammana, chammana,
Government should not waste money by providing Z plus security to Mr. Padmanabah.. there is no benefit for common man even if yeddy get marry or not ? Its their personal life. Wishing good luck for yeddy and shoba.. happy married life..
Wishing you both Happiest Married Life.
Next Karnataka Cabinet, Lungi and Chaddi leading Karnataka Govt
Marriage is not a crime in our Hindustani tradition we have a perfect way of getting marriage system, That's in life one Time only what here Yeddi and Lunggi did Twice could you please clarify Master Viren ???
It is an open secret. I think few people still need confirmation.
Yeddy killed his wife to get marrried with shobha. Yeddy has the support from Swamis, because after getting married he supplies women to swamis.
Yeddy used to find with Nithyananda. If there was no women then they used to fulfill their desires. This is going on in Indian politics.
@Viren Kotian & Nihal
Marrying secretly is not a crime in India. but here suspicion arises over the death of former CM's wife!
After all why cant they stop drama ?
Anyway, happy married life.
Well said Mr Vieren Kotian. Let's take it positively.
Is marrying a crime in India? Well done Yeddy and Shobhakka. You have set an example of simple marriage. Let others follow this couple. Congrats :)
Add new comment