20-year-old survivor of honour killing turns crusader

Agencies
January 14, 2018

Kausalya and her husband of eight months were shown no mercy when they were attacked by a group of men armed with knives and sickles in a crowded market in the Udumalpet town in Tamil Nadu last year for daring to marry out of caste.

Kausalya, now 20, was left bloodied and dazed by the attack captured on security cameras and viewed throughout India but her husband, Sankar, 22, died from his injuries, inflicted as he was a low-caste Dalit and had married a woman from a higher caste.

A couple of weeks ago, in front of television cameras, Kausalya voiced her relief that her testimony had helped bring death sentences against her father and five others who killed Sankar.

It was only the second instance of capital punishment awarded by a lower court in India for caste-based honour killings, which have risen sharply in Tamil Nadu over the past decade even as convictions remain rare, activists say.

"I gave testimony against my family because I don't see them as family, but as criminals who had to be brought to justice," said Kausalya, who is from the powerful Thevar community. "I don't want another Kausalya and Sankar to suffer the way we did," she said.

The case of Kausalya, who asked the court to reject the bail petitions of the accused 58 times, is particularly significant, as she was a witness who became a crusader, said Kathir, founder of Dalit Charity Evidence, which helped her through the trial. Kausalya now intends to appeal the three acquittals in the case, including that of her mother.

"These cases are usually not even registered by the police as caste-based crimes, and very few come to court. No one is willing to give evidence, least of all the Dalits, who fear for their lives," said Kathir, who goes by one name.

"This case was all because of Kausalya, who bravely took on her family. She fought for justice and became an activist against honour killings," he said.

About 500 people - mostly women - have died in so-called "honour killings" in India since 2014, according to government data, often carried out by family members who believe the relationship has brought "shame" on their community.

But activists say the crime is vastly under-reported, and that many killings are covered up to look like suicide. India banned caste-based discrimination in 1955, but centuries-old biases persist, and lower-caste groups, including Dalits, are among the most marginalised communities.

The intermingling of different castes or religions, particularly in marriage, remains taboo not only among rural populations, but even among well-off urban families.

While such killings are more common in feudalistic northern Indian states, evidence has recorded about 187 caste-based killings in Tamil Nadu in the past five years, most involving a higher-caste woman married to a Dalit man.

Such killings have surged in Tamil Nadu as women and lower-caste Dalit youths become better educated and are emboldened to oppose their families and higher-caste Hindus respectively, said V Geetha, a women's rights activist in Chennai.

"Some dominant castes have been emasculated by agrarian crises, and by the polity, and are experiencing a sense of loss and bewilderment. Meanwhile, women and Dalits are getting educated, becoming more mobile, and are pushing back," she said.

"For the higher castes, their sense of self is so tied to caste, they feel they have to preserve it at any cost. That's why we are seeing more caste violence, so much anger and aggression at these perceived threats to their identity," she added.

The first death sentence by a lower court for honour killings was handed down last year in Tirunelveli town in Tamil Nadu.

But such convictions are rare, said Kathir, who helps victims file charge sheets, get evidence and convince witnesses to testify. He wants a separate law for these killings.

A court in Chennai, last year called for specialist police units to protect inter-caste couples, and state police launched a hotline to help prevent honour killings.

But Tamil Nadu does not plan to bring a separate law, said V Amuthavalli, director of the state commission for women, citing official data that showed only one honour killing in the state last year. Kathir says there were at least 75.

"Our existing laws are powerful enough. The verdict in the Kausalya case shows the system works and the state takes stern action, so a separate law is not needed," Amuthavalli said.

Kausalya, who now lives with Sankar's family, has since cut her long hair short, and set up a tutoring facility for Dalit youths. She speaks publicly against honour killings and atrocities against Dalits. "Each day that we were married, we lived in fear. But we had dreams of a long life together," she said. "Sometimes I wish I had also died, but if I had, Sankar would not have got justice, my family would not have been punished. So many people have helped me, it has inspired me to carry on the fight against caste and honour killings."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 13,2020

New Delhi, Jul 13: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has blocked Bharti Airtel's Platinum and Vodafone Idea's RedX premium plans that offer faster data speeds and priority services to customers as both the plans were violating net neutrality norms.

The telecom watchdog has asked Bharti Airtel to explain within seven days how such a similar plan being launched does not violate the rules of net neutrality.

Vodafone Idea's RedX plan has been in the market since November 2019. They made some modifications in May 2020 and the Bharti Airtel was soon going to launch a similar plan.

According to TRAI, the higher speed for premium customers discriminate against others and violates net neutrality.

Responding to TRAI's move, Airtel spokesperson said: "We are passionate about delivering the best network and service experience to all our customers. This is why we have a relentless obsession to eliminate faults and have been consistently recognised by international agencies as the best network in terms of speed, latency and video experience."

"At the same time, we want to keep raising the bar for our post-paid customers in terms of service and responsiveness. This is an ongoing effort at our end," the spokesperson said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 27,2020

Mumbai, Jun 27: The Bombay High Court observed that COVID-19 patients from poor and indigent sections cannot be expected to produce documentary proof to avail subsidised or free treatment while getting admitted to hospitals.

The court on Friday was hearing a plea filed by seven residents of a slum rehabilitation building in Bandra, who had been charged ₹ 12.5 lakh by K J Somaiya Hospital for COVID-19 treatment between April 11 and April 28.

The bench of Justices Ramesh Dhanuka and Madhav Jamdar directed the hospital to deposit ₹10 lakh in the court.

The petitioners had borrowed money and managed to pay ₹10 lakh out of ₹12.5 lakh that the hospital had demanded, after threatening to halt their discharge if they failed to clear the bill, counsel Vivek Shukla informed the court.

According to the plea, the petitioners were also overcharged for PPE kits and unused services.

On June 13, the court had directed the state charity commissioner to probe if the hospital had reserved 20% beds for poor and indigent patients and provided free or subsidised treatment to them.

Last week, the joint charity commissioner had informed the court that although the hospital had reserved such beds, it had treated only three poor or indigent persons since the lockdown.

It was unfathomable that the hospital that claimed to have reserved 90 beds for poor and indigent patients had treated only three such persons during the pandemic, advocate Shukla said.

He further argued that COVID-19 patients, who are in distress, cannot be expected to produce income certificate and such documents as proof.

However, senior advocate Janak Dwarkadas, who represented the hospital, said the petitioners did not belong to economically weak or indigent categories and had not produced documents to prove the same.

A person who is suffering from a disease like COVID-19 cannot be expected to produce certificates from a tehsildar or social welfare officer before seeking admission in the hospital, the bench noted and asked the hospital to deposit ₹10 lakh in court within two weeks.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 13,2020

New Delhi, Jul 13: The Income Tax Department has facilitated a new functionality for banks and post offices to ascertain TDS applicability rates on cash withdrawal of above Rs 20 lakh in case of a non-filer of the income-tax return and that of above Rs 1 crore in case of a filer of the income-tax return.

In a statement, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said that now banks and post offices have to only enter the PAN of the person who is withdrawing cash for ascertaining the applicable rate of TDS.

So far, more than 53,000 verification requests have been executed successfully on this facility, a statement by the CBDT said.

"CBDT today said that this functionality available as 'Verification of applicability u/s 194N' on www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in since 1st July 2020, is also made available to the Banks through web-services so that the entire process can be automated and be linked to the Bank's internal core banking solution," it said.

On entering PAN by the bank or the post office, a message will be instantly displayed on the departmental utility: "TDS is deductible at the rate of 2 per cent if cash withdrawal exceeds Rs 1 crore", in case the person withdrawing cash is a filer of the income-tax return.

In case the person withdrawing cash is a non-filer of income tax return, the message shown would be: "TDS is deductible at the rate of 2 per cent if cash withdrawal exceeds Rs 20 lakh and at the rate of 5 per cent if it exceeds Rs 1 crore."

The CBDT said that the data on cash withdrawal indicated that huge amount of cash is withdrawn by the persons who have never filed income-tax returns.

To ensure filing of return by these persons and to keep track on cash withdrawals by the non-filers, and to curb black money, the Finance Act, 2020 with effect from July 1, 2020 further amended IT Act to lower threshold of cash withdrawal to Rs 20 lakh for the applicability of this TDS for the non-filers and also mandated TDS at the higher rate of 5 per cent on cash withdrawal exceeding Rs 1 crore by the non-filers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.