For $200,000, Tesla Will Sell You The 'World's Fastest' Consumer Car

Agencies
November 18, 2017

Nov 18: Tesla's very first car is back. It's red. It's fast. And it will cost you upward of $200,000.

The Roadster, the electric sports car that put the automaker on the map, made a surprising appearance at Tesla's semi-truck event late Thursday. The next-generation Roadster is Tesla's first new sports car since it discontinued the original in 2012, and marks the company's bid to remain competitive across several categories in the world of electric vehicles that it helped reshape.

The updated Roadster will achieve world record speeds, Tesla chief executive Elon Musk said during the event in Los Angeles. The base model can travel from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour in less than two seconds, making it the fastest consumer car on the planet, and the first to break the two-second mark, Musk said. He declined to give the Roadster's top speed but said it would surpass 250 mph.

But while Musk and his audience were characteristically gleeful, investors and some auto analysts were skeptical about the company's prospects. Tesla's stock fell nearly four percent in midday trading Friday. Some industry observers pointed to the company's production delays in its mass-market Model 3. Ed Hellwig, a senior editor at auto research website Edmunds.com, described the Roadster as a "very unnecessary distraction" whose reintroduction was likely designed to divert attention from Tesla's business struggles.

The company reported a net loss of $619 million, or about $2.92 per share,in its most recent earnings report, compared with a net income of $21 million and a gain of 71 cents per share, during the same period last year. Tesla also said recently that it had fired hundreds of employees after annual performance reviews. And it's unclear, even as the company faces production bottlenecks, where the new Roadster will be manufactured.

Analysts said that it's too early to tell if the Roadster will help lift Tesla to profitability, but the sports car gives the company's image a boost. "You can say a lot of things about Tesla, but one thing it's done is built a brilliant brand," said Michelle Krebs, executive analyst at Autotrader.

The original Roadster, released nearly a decade ago, was Tesla's the first step in a multistage process to entice the public with its promising technology and eventually offer all-electric vehicles to the masses. The company showed that electric vehicles could preform just as well, and perhaps even better, than cars powered by fossil fuel. Its limited run, in Tesla's view, was part of the plan.

"We started Tesla with a sports car, the Tesla Roadster. That baby got us going. It was the foundation of the whole company," said Musk said. "People have asked us for a long time, 'When are you going to make a new roadster?' We are making it now."

The successor, like the original, was designed to make a splash. The unveiling itself was a surprise, coming after Musk showed off Tesla's long-anticipated semitruck. But beyond Musk's flair for showmanship, experts said the new Roadster gives Tesla a prestige product to showcase and compete with.

"It's got a lot of sizzle. It worked before, and why not," said Krebs. "If they get it on the roads it will be something that will go head-to-head with Porsches and Ferraris and all the exotic vehicles."

Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst at Bernstein Research, described the Roadster as a "brand enhancing," car, in a note to investors Friday. But he also said he sees it as a low-volume product. He cautioned that Tesla should focus on building and selling the economy-class Model 3, rather than broadening its initiatives with new vehicles and energy projects.

While experts did not go so far as to describe the Roadster as a game changer, they said it will allow Tesla to challenge automakers of high-end sports cars who have been nudged, largely by Tesla, to make high-powered electric vehicles of their own. Musk made that argument in more colorful language. "The point of doing this is to just give a hardcore smackdown to gasoline cars," he said. "Driving a gasoline sports car is going to feel like a steam engine with a side of quiche."

Tesla says the car will come with a 200-kilowatt-hour battery, giving it a range of 620 miles at highway speeds without the need to recharge. In comparison, the current 75-kilowatt-hour battery in the Model S gives the sedan a 250-mile range. To put the Roadster's battery endurance into perspective, Musk said a driver would be able to travel from Los Angeles to San Francisco, and back again, on a single charge.

Up to four people can fit in the Roadster with "plenty of storage," Musk said. But he was quick to add that you can't put "giant" people in the back seat. The car will feature all-wheel drive and will have three motors.

The first customers of the new Roadster will have to wait a few years before they can climb in and let the top down, however. Musk said the car will not be available until 2020. The "Founders Series" will go for $250,000, but its specifications won't be shared until as early as next year, Musk said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 10,2020

In a first, the Supreme Court on Friday allowed the service of summons and notices, a necessity in almost all legal proceedings, through instant messenger like WhatsApp as well as by e-mail and fax.

A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde observed that it has been brought to the notice of the court that it is not feasible to visit post offices for service of notices, summons, and pleadings. The bench also comprising Justices AS Bopanna and R Subhash Reddy observed that notice and summons should be sent through e-mail on the same day along with instant message through WhatsApp and other phone messenger services.

The bench clarified that all methods should be deployed for a valid service on the party. "Two blue ticks would convey that the receiver has seen the notice," noted the bench.

The bench declined the request of the Attorney General for specifically naming WhatsApp as a mode of effectuating service. The top court noted that it would not be practical to specify only WhatsApp. The apex court also permitted RBI to extend the validity of cheques in the backdrop of lockdown to contain the coronavirus outbreak.

Senior advocate V Giri representing RBI informed the bench that he had circulated the note regarding validity of a cheque as directions issued on the previous hearing.

The bench noted that it will be in discretion of the RBI to issue orders which are suitable to alter the validity of the period of a cheque.

During an earlier hearing on the matter on July 7, the Attorney General contended before the top court that the Centre had some reservations in connection with the utilization of mobile applications like WhatsApp and other apps for service of summons. The Centre's top law officer informed the apex court that these apps claimed to be encrypted, and they were not trustworthy.

The RBI counsel had contended before the top court that it was considering clarifying the validity of a cheque which has been reduced to 3 months from 6 months.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 12,2020

Washington D.C., Jan 12: A recent study has claimed that people end up wasting almost an entire day when they take a vacation.

This can happen while standing in a queue or searching for places to visit, people do not keep a count of the time they have actually utilised during the trip. As a result, they end up doing much lesser activities than they originally had planned.

According to a recent report in Fox News, the study has also shared the fact that people try to justify time waste with planning and scheduling activities whereas the truth is that these things can be done well ahead to save time during the trip.

The average time waste according to the study commissioned by Sykes Holiday Cottages also said the people taking a seven days' trip waste a minimum of 17-and-a-half hours to figure out various factors.

But there are other causes involved as well. When one visits any crowded location, the real-time spent to enjoy the location is lesser than the time spent on reaching and trying to get involved. For instance, if one visits an amusement park, the activities take lesser time than the preparatory and other phases.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 25,2020

New Delhi, Jan 25: The Patiala House court on Saturday started hearing a plea filed by the Nirbhaya convicts that alleged that the Tihar Jail administration have "not presented the papers on time".

The Public Prosecutor informed the court that Tihar Jail authorities have already supplied the relevant documents. He further informed that these are mere delaying tactics adopted by the convicts.

Advocate A.P. Singh, lawyer for three of the four death row convicts in the Nirbhaya gang-rape case had moved an application before the court seeking directions to the Tihar Jail authorities to supply him the relevant documents in order to exercise the remaining legal remedies available with the death row convicts -- Vinay Pawan and Akshay.

The Public Prosecutor also told the court that he spoke to the jail authorities over the phone and a report in this regard will be filed shortly as the jail officials were on their way to the court.

The judge demanded from the convicts lawyer to show what he has filed.

The convicts lawyer, A.P. Singh, said that he received some documents, but has still not been supplied with the personal diary of one of the convict -- Vinay Kumar Sharma and also the medical documents.

Judge then asked the lawyer to wait for until the report arrives form the Tihar Jail.

On this, the convicts lawyer said he was not questioning the intention of the jail. "I know the jail has been changed. It isn't there fault, too," he said.

The Public Prosecutor refuted the allegation saying that the defence counsel was trying to defeat the speed of law.

"We have supplied all the documents to the counsel. We have supplied all the documents except the painting and some other documents. We have nothing apart from that," public prosecutor said.

Singh, in his plea filed before the Patiala House Court sought urgent orders of the court in order to file a mercy petition of Vinay Sharma and in relation to requests for documents for convicts Vinay Sharma, Pawan Kumar Gupta and Akshay Kumar Singh.

He further said that the convicts undertook several steps to obtain relevant information necessary for filing the mercy petitions. In regular interval, the convicts requested the concerned authority to supply documents pertaining to their medical records from 2012 to 2015 and 2019-2020, records of cellular confinement, records of the amount earned in prison through labour, records of educational and reformative activities like Tihar Olympics and Painting, etc.

The Supreme court had recently dismissed the curative petition for the other two convicts -- Vinay Kumar Sharma (26) and Mukesh Singh (32).

The court had recently issued death warrant against the convicts and fixed 6 a.m. on February 1 as the date and time of execution of the death penalty.

The 23-year-old victim in the case was brutally gang raped and tortured on December 16, 2012, which later led to her death. All the six accused were arrested and charged with sexual assault and murder. One of the accused was a minor and appeared before a juvenile justice court, while another accused committed suicide in Tihar Jail.

Four of the convicts were sentenced to death by a trial court in September 2013, and the verdict was confirmed by the Delhi High Court in March 2014 and subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court in May 2017, which also dismissed their review petitions.

A Juvenile involved in the crime was convicted by a juvenile justice board and released from a reformation home after serving a three-year term.

Hearing in a different case, Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde on Thursday said a condemned person cannot fight the death penalty endlessly and it was important for the capital punishment to reach its finality.

The death penalty, he noted, cannot be questioned at every turn by the convict.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.